GM is navigating a highly capital-intensive transition to EV and AV models while managing the cyclicality of its legacy ICE business. The severe discount against external street consensus ($94.08) is fully intentional and bridged by structurally overweighting Owner Earnings, which enforces a steep penalty for the EV transition's massive maintenance capex that unadjusted EPS multipliers ignore. Fair value range: low $28.1, high $82.0, with mid-point at $51.8.
Stock analysis
General Motors CompanyGM General Motors Company fair value $52–$82
Englische Quelle wird angezeigt, während wir übersetzen
Dieser Bericht wurde noch nicht übersetzt. Aktualisieren Sie in ein paar Minuten, sobald die Übersetzungswarteschlange aufgeholt hat.
§1 Zusammenfassung
We initiate GM with a Sell rating and a $51.82 fair value.
The market focuses on EPS while ignoring severe negative FCFF (-$4.18B) from the EV transition.
A 43% weight on Owner Earnings enforces a structural penalty for high CapEx-to-D&A (1.48x).
We see 34% downside to current prices as the capital cycle overwhelms near-term earnings.
Fair value
$52
Margin of safety
-51.3%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
3/10
Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.
$78.41Price
FV $51.82
High $81.98
GM is navigating a highly capital-intensive transition to EV and AV models while managing the cyclicality of its legacy ICE business. The severe discount against external street consensus ($94.08) is fully intentional and bridged by structurally overweighting Owner Earnings, which enforces a steep penalty for the EV transition's massive maintenance capex that unadjusted EPS multipliers ignore.
Manufacturing Scale
Manufacturing Scale
Brand Recognition
Brand Recognition
Cycle upside
High capacity utilization and strong pricing power.
§2 Bärenszenario
Prolonged ICE margin compression coupled with EV adoption stalling results in stranded capital and massive structural cash burn, forcing fair value down to $28.11.
Wie diese These scheitern kann
EV Transition Failure
· High
Massive capital deployed into EV platforms fails to generate adequate ROIC due to lack of consumer demand.
FV impact
-$20/share
Trigger
2026-2028
ICE Pricing Collapse
· Medium
Macroeconomic weakness and inventory gluts lead to severe pricing pressure on legacy ICE models, destroying cash flow.
FV impact
-$15/share
Trigger
2026-2027
Autonomous (Cruise) Write-off
· Medium
Regulatory headwinds and technical failures force a complete write-off of the Cruise AV division.
FV impact
-$10/share
Trigger
2026-2029
Frühwarnsignale zur Überwachung
Kennzahl
Aktuell
Auslöseschwelle
Rising Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) for legacy ICE trucks.
Monitor
Deterioration versus the report thesis
Decelerating EV sales growth relative to capex spend.
Monitor
Deterioration versus the report thesis
Negative revisions to forward EPS consensus estimates.
Monitor
Deterioration versus the report thesis
Further margin compression in the North American segment.
Monitor
Deterioration versus the report thesis
Increased promotional spending and dealer incentives.
Monitor
Deterioration versus the report thesis
§3 Finanzielle Historie
Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung — letzte sechs Perioden
Position
T−0
T−1
T−2
T−3
CAGR
Periode
2022-12-31
2023-12-31
2024-12-31
2025-12-31
Trend
Umsatz
$156.74B
$171.84B
$187.44B
$185.02B
+5.7%
Bruttogewinn
$20.98B
$19.14B
$23.41B
$11.60B
-17.9%
Betriebsergebnis
$10.31B
$9.30B
$12.78B
$2.91B
-34.4%
Nettogewinn
$9.93B
$10.13B
$6.01B
$2.70B
-35.2%
EPS (verwässert)
$6.13
$7.32
$6.37
$3.27
-18.9%
EBITDA
$23.87B
$23.20B
$21.75B
$18.43B
-8.3%
F&E
—
—
—
—
—
VVG
$10.67B
$9.84B
$10.62B
$8.69B
-6.6%
Qualitäts-Scores
Piotroski F-Score
5 / 9
0–9 Qualitätskomposit
Altman Z-Score
1.22
Insolvenzrisiko (>3 sicher)
Beneish M-Score
-2.36
Risiko von Ergebnismanipulation
OCF / Nettogewinn
9.96×
>1 weist auf hohe Ergebnisqualität hin
Bilanzqualitätsschwelle
Pass
Sektoradjustierte Schwelle
ROIC
5.7%
Rendite auf eingesetztes Kapital
Abschnitt 3
Numbers analysis
Cashflow
Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCF / net income, accounting-quality, and ROIC rows above.
Kapitalallokation
Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.
Einzelabonnenten — ab §411 weitere Abschnitte
Vollständige Analyse lesen — 11 weitere Abschnitte.
Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.
Vollständiger Bericht für jeden abgedeckten Ticker
Based on our latest independent analysis, GM looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $78.4 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $51.8 (range $28.1–$82.0), which implies roughly 33.9% downside to the midpoint.
Our composite fair-value range for GM is $28.1–$82.0, with a midpoint of $51.8. The range is triangulated across multiple valuation models (discounted earnings, forward earnings scenarios, peer multiples, and where applicable owner earnings or reverse DCF) and weighted by reliability for General Motors Company's archetype.
Our current rating for GM is Sell with a confidence score of 88/100. Sell. Fair value of $51.82 sits well below current trading levels of $78.41. This is independent research for educational purposes, not personalized investment advice.
The top risks our latest report flags for General Motors Company are: EV Transition Failure; ICE Pricing Collapse; Autonomous (Cruise) Write-off. The single biggest risk is EV Transition Failure: Massive capital deployed into EV platforms fails to generate adequate ROIC due to lack of consumer demand.
Our current rating for GM is Sell, issued with a confidence score of 88/100 and a moat score of 3/10. The rating reflects the composite fair-value range ($28.1–$82.0) versus the current price of $78.4.
General Motors Company is classified as a cyclical stock. Archetype determines how every downstream parameter — discount rate, terminal growth, deceleration curve, terminal multiple, scenario probability weights, scorecard weights, and which valuation models are prioritized — is calibrated for GM.
