Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
HUBS trades against a final fair-value range of $34.65-$61.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $34.6, high $61.5, with mid-point at $47.9.
Stock analysis

HUBS HUBS fair value $35–$62

HUBS
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analysiert: 2026-05-10Nächste Aktualisierung: 2026-08-10Methodology v2.5Review: automatedArchetype: Mature compounder
View archive
Kurs
$197.34
▼ -149.47 (-75.74%)
Fair Value
$48
$35–$62
Rating
Verkaufen
confidence 59/100
Aufwärtspotenzial
-75.7%
upside to fair value
Sicherheitsmarge
$40.69
MoS level · 15%
Marktkapitalisierung
$10.1B
P/E fwd 12.7
Englische QuelleDE
Englische Quelle wird angezeigt, während wir übersetzen
Dieser Bericht wurde noch nicht übersetzt. Aktualisieren Sie in ein paar Minuten, sobald die Übersetzungswarteschlange aufgeholt hat.

§1 Zusammenfassung

  • Composite fair value $48 with high case $62.
  • Implied downside of 75.7% to fair value.
  • Moat 6.5/10 · confidence 59/100 · Mature compounder.
  • Currently screens above fair value, so patience matters more than entry speed.
Fair value
$48
Margin of safety
-312.2%
Confidence
59/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$197.34Price
Low $34.65
Mid $47.87
High $61.51

HUBS trades against a final fair-value range of $34.65-$61.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • High switching costs driven by
    High switching costs driven by deep operational integration across marketing, sales, and service hubs.
  • Comprehensive all-in-one ecosystem tailored for
    Comprehensive all-in-one ecosystem tailored for the mid-market and SMB demographic.
  • Bull thesis
    Contrarian reality: The market is severely mispricing structural FCF limits and ignoring real shareholder dilution.

§2 Bärenszenario

A sustained 20% drop in SMB IT spend coupled with stagnant enterprise migration severely pressures the 20% long-term operating marginOperating marginOperating income (EBIT) divided by revenue. Captures profitability after both direct costs and operating expenses but before interest, tax, and non-operating items. target, leading to rapid multiple contraction.

Wie diese These scheitern kann

SMB Macroeconomic Collapse

· Medium

A severe recession drives mass insolvency and seat reductions among core SMB customers, devastating revenue and driving massive structural churn.

FV impact
Severe
Trigger
1-2 years

Enterprise Penetration Failure

· High

Failure to gain sustained traction upmarket caps growth rates while the legacy SMB segment saturates, permanently stalling margin expansion.

FV impact
High
Trigger
2-3 years

SBC Dilution Spirals

· Medium

Stock-based compensation burden grows unchecked without commensurate core free cash flow growth, severely diluting existing shareholders.

FV impact
High
Trigger
3-5 years
Frühwarnsignale zur Überwachung
KennzahlAktuellAuslöseschwelle
Sustained deceleration in total net-new customer logo additions.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Reversal in ARPU trends as seat downgrades and discounting accelerate.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenue exceeding 20%.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Core gross margin compression structurally falling below 80%.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Failure to clear interim 10% GAAP operating margin targets.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Finanzielle Historie

Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung — letzte sechs Perioden
PositionT−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
Periode2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Umsatz$1.73B$2.17B$2.63B$3.13B+21.8%
Bruttogewinn$1.42B$1.83B$2.23B$2.62B+22.6%
Betriebsergebnis$-102.9M$-104.1M$-63.6M$11.4M
Nettogewinn$-107.3M$-164.5M$4.6M$45.9M
EPS (verwässert)$-2.35$-3.30$0.09$0.86
EBITDA$-36.5M$-74.1M$129.2M$206.6M
F&E$442.0M$617.7M$778.7M$905.9M+27.0%
VVG$1.08B$1.32B$1.52B$1.71B+16.3%

Qualitäts-Scores

Piotroski F-Score
6 / 9
0–9 Qualitätskomposit
Altman Z-Score
4.3
Insolvenzrisiko (>3 sicher)
Beneish M-Score
-3.01
Risiko von Ergebnismanipulation
OCF / Nettogewinn
16.57×
>1 weist auf hohe Ergebnisqualität hin
Bilanzqualitätsschwelle
Pass
Sektoradjustierte Schwelle
ROIC
2.4%
Rendite auf eingesetztes Kapital
Abschnitt 3

Numbers analysis

Cashflow

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCFOperating cash flowCash generated from the company's core operations after working-capital changes but before capital expenditures. The first line of the cash-flow statement. / net incomeNet IncomeNet Income is an income-statement line item used to reconcile revenue to operating profit, pre-tax income, net income, or per-share earnings. It should be compared across periods and against peer disclosure conventions., accounting-quality, and ROICROICReturn on invested capital. Operating profit (after tax) divided by invested capital. The single best gauge of capital-efficiency. Spread over WACC = economic value created. rows above.

Kapitalallokation

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Einzelabonnenten — ab §411 weitere Abschnitte

Vollständige Analyse lesen — 11 weitere Abschnitte.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Vollständiger Bericht für jeden abgedeckten Ticker
24 Monate Rating-Archiv
Watchlist-Briefings + Rating-Änderungs-Warnungen
PDF + DOCX Export in jeder Sprache
Kostenlose Testversion starten
Jederzeit kündbar.
FAQ

HUBS — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, HUBS looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $197 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $47.9 (range $34.6–$61.5), which implies roughly 75.7% downside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of HUBS also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder