Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Micron is successfully pivoting from a highly cyclical commodity player into a critical AI infrastructure provider. The expansion into High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) provides a structural shift in both margin profile and earnings stability. Fair value range: low $557, high $865, with mid-point at $707.
Stock analysis

MU Micron Technology Inc. fair value $707–$865

MU
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analysiert: 2026-05-08Nächste Aktualisierung: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature compounderNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
Kurs
$646.63
▲ +60.50 (+9.36%)
Fair Value
$707
$707–$865
Rating
Halten
confidence 88/100
Aufwärtspotenzial
+9.4%
upside to fair value
Sicherheitsmarge
$601.06
buy below · 15%
Marktkapitalisierung
$729.2B
P/E fwd 6.4
Englische QuelleDE
Englische Quelle wird angezeigt, während wir übersetzen
Dieser Bericht wurde noch nicht übersetzt. Aktualisieren Sie in ein paar Minuten, sobald die Übersetzungswarteschlange aufgeholt hat.

§1 Zusammenfassung

  • Initiating at Hold with a fair value midpoint of $707.13.
  • Transition to HBM alters margin profile and dampens historical cyclicality.
  • Heavy near-term capital intensity ($15.8B Capex) remains a significant free cash flow drag.
Fair value
$707
Margin of safety
+8.6%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$646.63Price
FV $707.13
High $864.53

Micron is successfully pivoting from a highly cyclical commodity player into a critical AI infrastructure provider. The expansion into High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) provides a structural shift in both margin profile and earnings stability.

  • HBM Advanced Packaging Integration
    HBM Advanced Packaging Integration
  • Consolidated Oligopolistic Industry Structure
    Consolidated Oligopolistic Industry Structure
  • Cycle upside
    Unprecedented AI training and inference demands require structurally higher memory density, driving a prolonged upcycle in HBM and starving traditional DRAM supply.

§2 Bärenszenario

A simultaneous AI spending pause and hyperscaler inventory digestion cycle would severely impact pricing power, reverting margins to historical cyclical troughs while leaving the firm exposed to high fixed capital expenditure costs.

Wie diese These scheitern kann

Competitor Capacity Over-Expansion

25%· Medium

SK Hynix and Samsung rapidly expand capacity, returning the HBM market to a state of brutal commodity oversupply and crushing margins.

FV impact
-30%
Trigger
12-18 months

AI Infrastructure Capex Cooling

20%· Medium

Hyperscalers pause compute cluster build-outs, leading to a severe inventory correction and plummeting memory ASPs across the board.

FV impact
-40%
Trigger
18-24 months

Geopolitical Restrictions Escalate

15%· Low

Deepening geopolitical tensions and new export restrictions severely limit remaining operations and revenue exposure in China.

FV impact
-10%
Trigger
6-12 months
Frühwarnsignale zur Überwachung
KennzahlAktuellAuslöseschwelle
HBM3E yield degradation or failure to qualify for next-generation Nvidia architectures.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Sequential ASP declines in traditional data center and client DRAM.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Competitor capital expenditure guidance significantly exceeding forward demand forecasts.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Free cash flow turning deeply negative despite top-line revenue growth.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Hyperscaler earnings commentary indicating pushed-out AI compute cluster deployments.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Finanzielle Historie

Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung — letzte sechs Perioden
PositionT−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
Periode2022-08-312023-08-312024-08-312025-08-31Trend
Umsatz$30.76B$15.54B$25.11B$37.38B+6.7%
Bruttogewinn$13.90B$-1.42B$5.61B$14.87B+2.3%
Betriebsergebnis$9.71B$-5.41B$1.31B$9.81B+0.3%
Nettogewinn$8.69B$-5.83B$778.0M$8.54B-0.6%
EPS (verwässert)$7.75$-5.34$0.70$7.59-0.7%
EBITDA$16.88B$2.49B$9.58B$18.48B+3.1%
F&E$3.12B$3.11B$3.43B$3.80B+6.8%
VVG$1.07B$920.0M$1.13B$1.21B+4.2%

Qualitäts-Scores

Piotroski F-Score
7 / 9
0–9 Qualitätskomposit
Altman Z-Score
17.21
Insolvenzrisiko (>3 sicher)
Beneish M-Score
-2.73
Risiko von Ergebnismanipulation
OCF / Nettogewinn
2.05×
>1 weist auf hohe Ergebnisqualität hin
Bilanzqualitätsschwelle
Pass
Sektoradjustierte Schwelle
ROIC
6.7%
Rendite auf eingesetztes Kapital
Abschnitt 3

Numbers analysis

Cashflow

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCF / net income, accounting-quality, and ROIC rows above.

Kapitalallokation

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Einzelabonnenten — ab §411 weitere Abschnitte

Vollständige Analyse lesen — 11 weitere Abschnitte.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Vollständiger Bericht für jeden abgedeckten Ticker
24 Monate Rating-Archiv
Watchlist-Briefings + Rating-Änderungs-Warnungen
PDF + DOCX Export in jeder Sprache
Kostenlose Testversion starten
Jederzeit kündbar.
FAQ

MU — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest independent analysis, MU looks modestly undervalued. The current price is $647 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $707 (range $557–$865), which implies roughly 9.4% upside to the midpoint.