Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
CRWD trades against a final fair-value range of $91.54-$123.84, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $91.5, high $124, with mid-point at $108.
Stock analysis

CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. fair value $108–$124

CRWD
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analizado: 2026-05-08Próxima actualización: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.4Archetype: Pre-profitNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
Precio
$468.07
▼ -360.38 (-76.99%)
Valor razonable
$108
$108–$124
Calificación
Vender
confidence 74/100
Potencial alcista
-77.0%
upside to fair value
Margen de seguridad
$91.54
buy below · 15%
Capitalización bursátil
$119.1B
P/E fwd 75.9
Respaldo en inglésES
Mostrando la fuente en inglés mientras traducimos
Este informe aún no se ha traducido. Actualice en unos minutos una vez que la cola de traducción se ponga al día.

§1 Resumen ejecutivo

  • Composite fair value $108 with high case $124.
  • Implied downside of 77.0% to fair value.
  • Moat 6.5/10 · confidence 74/100 · Pre-profit.
  • Currently screens above fair value, so patience matters more than entry speed.
Fair value
$108
Margin of safety
-334.6%
Confidence
74/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$468.07Price
FV $107.69
High $123.84

CRWD trades against a final fair-value range of $91.54-$123.84, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • High switching costs associated with
    High switching costs associated with deeply embedded endpoint agents.
  • Network effects from vast threat
    Network effects from vast threat intelligence data lake.
  • Cycle upside
    Vendor consolidation favors integrated platforms like Falcon.

§2 Caso bajista

At current multiples, the stock offers zero margin of safety. A failure to execute flawlessly on top-line growth or margin expansion will trigger a severe multiple contraction.

Cómo puede fallar esta tesis

Margin Compression

· High

Fierce competition from Microsoft and PANW forces pricing compression, capping terminal margins below 20%.

FV impact
-30%

SBC Dilution

· Medium

Failure to rein in excessive stock-based compensation (22.7% of revenue) structurally impairs per-share intrinsic value.

FV impact
-20%

Growth Deceleration

· Low

Market saturation in endpoint security causes revenue growth to decelerate sharply below the 20% required by current multiples.

FV impact
-50%
Señales de alerta temprana a vigilar
MétricaActualUmbral de activación
Net new ARR growth decelerates for two consecutive quarters.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross retention dips below 97%.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
SBC remains above 20% of revenue without a clear path to the 7.8% industry median.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Operating margins fail to scale towards the 30% terminal target.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Increased discounting observed in enterprise renewals.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Historial financiero

Cuenta de resultados — últimos seis períodos
ConceptoT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4CAGR
Período2022-01-312023-01-312024-01-312025-01-312026-01-31Trend
Ingresos$1.45B$2.24B$3.06B$3.95B$4.81B+34.9%
Beneficio bruto$1.07B$1.64B$2.30B$2.96B$3.59B+35.4%
Beneficio operativo$-142.5M$-190.1M$-2.0M$-120.4M$-293.3M
Beneficio neto$-234.8M$-183.2M$89.3M$-19.3M$-162.5M
BPA (diluido)$-1.03$-0.79$0.37$-0.08
EBITDA$-66.0M$-40.8M$293.8M$294.8M$182.5M
I+D$371.3M$608.4M$768.5M$1.08B$1.38B+39.0%
SG&A$839.6M$1.22B$1.53B$2.01B$2.50B+31.4%

Puntuaciones de calidad

Piotroski F-score
4 / 9
Compuesto de calidad 0–9
Altman Z-score
11.4
Riesgo de quiebra (>3 seguro)
Beneish M-score
-2.95
Riesgo de manipulación de beneficios
OCF / Beneficio neto
-9.92
>1 indica alta calidad de los beneficios
Umbral de calidad contable
Fail
Umbral ajustado por sector
ROIC
34.9%
Rentabilidad del capital invertido
Sección 3

Numbers analysis

Flujo de caja

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCF / net income, accounting-quality, and ROIC rows above.

Asignación de capital

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Suscriptores individuales — desde §411 secciones más

Leer el análisis completo — 11 secciones más.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Informe completo para cada ticker cubierto
24 meses de archivo de calificaciones
Briefings de lista de seguimiento + alertas de cambio de calificación
Exportación PDF + DOCX en cualquier idioma
Comenzar prueba gratuita
Cancela cuando quieras.
FAQ

CRWD — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest independent analysis, CRWD looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $468 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $108 (range $91.5–$124), which implies roughly 77.0% downside to the midpoint.