Análisis opcionales del producto
Con tu permiso, usamos análisis limitados y respetuosos con la privacidad para entender qué recorridos de investigación funcionan. No usamos rastreadores publicitarios ni grabación de sesiones. Puedes cambiar esta opción en Preferencias. Lee la Política de privacidad.
Bull: Accelerated Gulfstream deliveries coupled with an expanding U.S.
Submarine Program Descoping: Cancellation or significant descoping of major nuclear submarine programs structurally impairs long-term backlog and visibility.
General Dynamics is a premium mature compounder with a highly defensive moat underpinned by multi-year U.S. Navy submarine contracts (Marine Systems) and high-end corporate aviation leadership (Gulfstream). Its scale, massive backlog, and steady low-double-digit ROIC generate highly predictable free cash flows.
General Dynamics is a premium mature compounder with a highly defensive moat underpinned by multi-year U.S. Navy submarine contracts (Marine Systems) and high-end corporate aviation leadership (Gulfstream). Its scale, massive backlog, and steady low-double-digit ROIC generate highly predictable free cash flows.
Intangible Assets via entrenched U.S. Defense contracts
Switching Costs embedded in long-cycle nuclear submarine platforms
Expanding global defense budgets and elevated corporate jet demand drive sustained margin expansion and robust top-line growth.
Hold. Valuation accurately reflects strong fundamentals, leaving a limited margin of safety.
General Dynamics Corporation operates as an aerospace and defense company worldwide. It operates through four segments: Aerospace, Marine Systems, Combat Systems, and Technologies. The Aerospace segment produces and sells business jets; and offers aircraft maintenance and repair, management, aircraft-on-ground support, customer support and custom completion services, modifications, upgrades, and lifecycle sustainment support services. The Marine Systems segment designs and builds nuclear-powered submarines, surface combatants, and auxiliary ships for the United States Navy and Jones Act ships for commercial customers, as well as provides maintenance, modernization, and lifecycle support services for navy ships; offers and program management, planning, engineering, and design support services for submarine construction programs. The Combat Systems segment manufactures land combat solutions, such as wheeled and tracked combat vehicles, Stryker wheeled combat vehicles, piranha vehicles, weapons systems, energetics and munitions, mobile bridge systems with payloads, tactical vehicles, main battle tanks, and armored vehicles; and offers modernization programs, support and sustainment services, and development programs. The Technologies segment provides information technology solutions and mission support services; mobile communication, computers, and command-and-control mission systems; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance solutions to military, intelligence, and federal civilian customers; cloud services, cybersecurity, network modernization, artificial intelligence; machine learning; application development, high-performance computing, and 5G and advanced communications services; and unmanned undersea vehicle manufacturing and assembly services. The company was founded in 1899 and is headquartered in Reston, Virginia.
Continuing resolutions in the U.S. defense budget, supply chain bottlenecks, or a severe macroeconomic downturn limiting corporate jet demand compress margins and stunt near-term revenue growth. Terminal growth reverts below historical averages.
Continuing resolutions in the U.S. defense budget, acute supply chain bottlenecks, or a severe macroeconomic downturn limiting corporate jet demand compress margins and stunt near-term revenue growth.
Cancellation or significant descoping of major nuclear submarine programs structurally impairs long-term backlog and visibility.
Operating margins compress below 10% despite due to unmitigated supply chain costs and intense pricing pressure.
Los cinco acontecimientos que debilitarían nuestra tesis de inversión.
Structural margin erosion would reveal severe supply chain friction or cost overruns across fixed-price defense contracts, reducing conversion of expanded revenue into net profit and suppressing operating earnings power.
Actual:10.2% for the period ended 2025-12-31
Alerta siFalls below 10.0% over any trailing twelve-month period
Intangible Assets via entrenched U.S. Defense contracts
Switching Costs embedded in long-cycle nuclear submarine platforms
Scale Advantages in global corporate aviation
Economic profit is supported when reported returns exceed the company cost-of-capital hurdle.
Each lens answers a different valuation question. Only included lenses set Fair value; floors and diagnostics provide context.
Unavailable
FCFF DCF remains positive at the base case: base FCFF $4.3B after capex $1.2B, with terminal value at 61.0% of enterprise value. No FCF cliff is projected unless capex/revenue or gross margin materially resets.
Accelerated Gulfstream deliveries coupled with an expanding U.S. defense budget for nuclear-powered submarines drive margin expansion and top-line growth significantly exceeding the base case.
If Gulfstream deliveries accelerate and margins sustainably expand >10.5%, upside bias validates the premium multiple. If Marine Systems margins contract due to ongoing labor constraints, expect downside valuation pressure toward $300.
If Gulfstream deliveries accelerate and margins sustainably expand >10.5%, upside bias validates the premium multiple. If Marine Systems margins contract due to ongoing labor constraints, expect downside valuation pressure toward $300.
If Gulfstream deliveries accelerate and margins sustainably expand >10.5%, upside bias validates the premium multiple. If Marine Systems margins contract due to ongoing labor constraints, expect downside valuation pressure toward $300.
If Gulfstream deliveries accelerate and margins sustainably expand >10.5%, upside bias validates the premium multiple. If Marine Systems margins contract due to ongoing labor constraints, expect downside valuation pressure toward $300.
Warning level: Falls below 10.0% over any trailing twelve-month period. Structural margin erosion would reveal severe supply chain friction or cost overruns across fixed-price defense contracts, reducing conversion of expanded revenue into net profit and suppressing operating earnings power.
Warning level: Drops below 14.0% over any annual period. Compression in gross profitability would indicate weakening corporate aviation or persistent manufacturing cost overruns, undermining aerospace cash generation and lowering overall consolidated returns.
Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.
| Ingresos | 52.550.000.000 |
|---|---|
| Coste de ventas | 44.599.000.000 |
| Beneficio bruto | 7.951.000.000 |
| Gastos operativos | 2.595.000.000 |
| Beneficio operativo | 5.356.000.000 |
| Partidas no operativas e impuestos | -1.146.000.000 |
| Beneficio neto | 4.210.000.000 |
| Activos totales | 57.249.000.000 |
|---|---|
| Efectivo | 2.333.000.000 |
| Activos corrientes | 24.248.000.000 |
| Pasivos totales | 31.627.000.000 |
| Pasivos corrientes | 16.796.000.000 |
| Patrimonio neto | 25.622.000.000 |
Datos financieros puntuales utilizados en el análisis del 2026-05-13.
| Período | Ingresos | EBITDA | Beneficio neto | Flujo de caja operativo | Flujo de caja libre | Capex | Depreciación y amortización | Compensación basada en acciones | Recompras de acciones | Dividendos pagados | Emisión neta de deuda | Flujo de inversión | Flujo de financiación | Efectivo inicial | Efectivo final | Efectivo e inversiones | Deuda total | Margen operativo | ROIC | WACC | Diferencial ROIC−WACC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-31 | 39,4 mil M | 5311 M | 3390 M | 4579 M | 3465 M | 1114 M | 884 M | 165 M | 1229 M | 1369 M | -1000 M | — | — | — | — | 1242 M | 12,1 mil M | 10,7 % | — | 7,4 % | — |
| 2023-12-31 | 42,3 mil M | 5246 M | 3315 M | 4710 M | 3806 M | 904 M | 863 M | 181 M | 434 M | 1428 M | -1250 M | — | — | — | — | 1913 M | 11,1 mil M | 10,0 % | — | 7,2 % | — |
| 2024-12-31 | 47,7 mil M | 5819 M | 3782 M | 4112 M | 3196 M | 916 M | 886 M | 183 M | 1501 M | 1529 M | -500 M | — | — | — | — | 1697 M | 10,7 mil M | 10,1 % | — | 7,8 % | — |
| 2025-12-31 | 52,6 mil M | 6429 M | 4210 M | 5120 M | 3959 M | 1161 M | 924 M | 196 M | 637 M | 1593 M | -753 M | — | — | — | — | 2333 M | 9789 M | 10,2 % | — | 6,7 % | — |
GD trades at 19.1x forward earnings against a peer median of 34.3x; EV/EBITDA of 15.4x against a peer median of 18.0x; 6 peers.
Mature capex phase with Capex/DA at 1.25x, heavily supporting robust capital return strategies via buybacks and dividends.
Expanding global defense budgets and elevated corporate jet demand drive sustained margin expansion and robust top-line growth.
Protracted budget continuing resolutions and corporate austerity heavily reduce long-cycle order flow and aftermarket services.
Mature capex phase with Capex/DA at 1.25x, heavily supporting robust capital return strategies via buybacks and dividends.
Core portfolio holding size given extremely low fundamental volatility and high dividend visibility.
Trim exposure aggressively if valuation multiples stretch beyond 22x P/E or if core strategic submarine programs face existential federal budget cuts.
Hold. The $353.62 composite fair value midpoint perfectly aligns with current pricing, offering a negligible ~2% upside and reflecting an aggressively priced mature compounder.
Current market valuation leaves virtually zero room for execution missteps. The extreme peer relative valuation gap (PEG 4.79x) demands flawless delivery on the existing defense and aerospace backlog.
Hold. The $353.62 composite fair value midpoint perfectly aligns with current pricing, offering a negligible ~2% upside and reflecting an aggressively priced mature compounder.
Reassess the thesis against the named valuation, risk, and quarterly checkpoint evidence in this report.
Capture your own thesis, position size, and follow-up questions. Stays on this device, only you can see it.
Market premium evaporates, dropping terminal P/E from 19x to 14x as the 'defense premium' normalizes to historical averages.
Compression in gross profitability would indicate weakening corporate aviation pricing power or persistent manufacturing cost overruns, undermining aerospace cash generation and lowering overall consolidated returns.
Actual:15.1% for the period ended 2025-12-31
Alerta siDrops below 14.0% over any annual period
Lower capital efficiency would show that heavy shipbuilding facility expansions and manufacturing investments are failing to generate targeted returns, permanently impairing economic value creation across marine systems.
Actual:12.3% as of the 2026-05-13 analysis date
Alerta siDeclines below 10.5% over any fiscal year
Operating cash generation failing to match accounting profits indicates working capital buildup, unbilled milestone receivables, or submarine construction delays that restrict capital allocation and balance sheet flexibility.
Actual:1.216 as of the 2026-05-13 analysis date
Alerta siFalls below 1.00x over any trailing twelve-month period
A severe deceleration in revenue growth would indicate naval procurement reductions or program restructuring, stalling multi-year backlog conversion and curtailing long-term top-line visibility across major defense segments.
Actual:10.1% for the period ended 2025-12-31
Alerta siSlows below 3.0% YoY over any fiscal year
Under the moderate discount rate, 132 US$ comes from forecast-period earnings and 182 US$ from the long-term value, totaling 314 US$.
Project EPS through the explicit advantage period, fade growth as competition catches up, and discount the full stream at cost of equity.
Apply a terminal P/E to the dated forward EPS path, then discount that future share value back to the analysis date.
Convert the revenue and margin path into after-tax free cash flow, discount the annual per-share amounts and terminal value at WACC, then adjust for signed net debt per current share.
Add depreciation to net income, subtract maintenance capex, divide by diluted shares, and apply a normalized valuation multiple.
Solve for the growth rate that makes the model value equal the report-date share price.
Stable execution across Marine Systems and Aerospace. The multi-stage moat fade model directly aligns with current market valuation, indicating the stock is fairly valued at current levels.
Warning level: Declines below 10.5% over any fiscal year. Lower capital efficiency would show that heavy shipbuilding facility expansions and manufacturing investments are failing to generate targeted returns, permanently impairing economic value creation across marine systems.
Warning level: Falls below 1.00x over any trailing twelve-month period. Operating cash generation failing to match accounting profits indicates working capital buildup, unbilled milestone receivables, or submarine construction delays that restrict capital allocation and balance sheet flexibility.
Warning level: Slows below 3.0% YoY over any fiscal year. A severe deceleration in revenue growth would indicate naval procurement reductions or program restructuring, stalling multi-year backlog conversion and curtailing long-term top-line visibility across major defense segments.
| Margen |
|---|
| GD | General Dynamics Corporation | $93.7B | 19.1x | 1.7x | 15.4x | — | — |
| GE | GE Aerospace | 34.3x | 6.4x | 29.1x | 45.4% | 20.2% | |
| RTX | RTX Corporation | 23.7x | 2.7x | 18.0x | 11.6% | 13.2% | |
| BA | The Boeing Company | 55.2x | 2.0x | -66.7x | 169.9% | 1.7% | |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 16.2x | 1.6x | 17.4x | 67.6% | 11.0% | |
| HWM | Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 45.3x | 12.5x | 43.1x | 33.8% | 28.2% |
