Con il tuo consenso utilizziamo analisi limitate e rispettose della privacy per capire quali percorsi di ricerca funzionano. Non usiamo tracker pubblicitari né registrazioni delle sessioni. Puoi modificare questa scelta nelle Preferenze. Leggi la Informativa sulla privacy.
Quote this valuation with its source: Fair value, Potential value and the price at analysis.
FAQ
NEE — frequently asked questions
Is NextEra Energy Inc. overvalued?
In our latest published analysis dated 2026-09-08, NEE trades close to fair value. The price recorded at analysis is 83,4 USD versus our fair value of 87,4 USD; the high endpoint is presented separately as potential value of 121 USD. That implies roughly 4.8% upside to fair value at that date.
Our latest published report, analyzed 2026-09-08, gives NEE a fair value of 87,4 USD and a potential value of 121 USD. The conclusion is triangulated across multiple valuation models and weighted by reliability for NextEra Energy Inc.'s archetype; it is a dated research output, not a live price.
Should I buy NEE now?
Our latest published rating for NEE, analyzed 2026-09-08, is Hold. NextEra Energy Inc. trades close to fair value at the analysis-date price of 83,4 USD versus fair value of 87,4 USD; potential value is 121 USD. This is research for educational purposes, not personalized investment advice.
What are the biggest risks for NEE?
The dedicated bear-case section in our report analyzed 2026-09-08 documents NextEra Energy Inc.'s material risks, evidence, thresholds, and thesis-invalidation conditions. Scenario-specific explanations remain in that section so the report does not repeat or decontextualize them elsewhere.
What is NEE's rating?
Our latest published rating for NEE, analyzed 2026-09-08, is Hold, with a published moat assessment of 1/10 (None). It reflects our fair value of 87,4 USD, the potential value of 121 USD, and the price recorded at analysis (83,4 USD).
Questo report non è ancora stato tradotto. Aggiorna tra qualche minuto una volta che la coda di traduzione avrà recuperato.
§1 SintesiEN
Risposta in 30 secondiHold
Prezzo rispetto al valore
Prezzo
$83.43
Fair value
$87.41
Valore potenziale
$121.21
Al
2026-09-04
Perché può funzionare
The strongest opportunity is that FY2027 diluted EPS holds within its forecast range while annual free cash flow remains positive after capital spending.
Cosa cambierebbe la nostra valutazione
Pre-tax cost of debt above 9.35% within 24 months.
Hold. At the report-date price of $83.43 on 2026-09-04, the shares sit below Fair value of $87.41, but the gap is modest.3
The main risk is refinancing. If pre-tax debt cost rises above 9.35% within 24 months, financing expense could absorb growth and weaken free cash flow.
Potential value is $121.21, but it requires stronger free cash flow after capital spending and durable earnings growth.
The clearest upside is that FY2027 diluted EPS stays within its $4.23-$4.68 forecast range while annual remains positive after capital spending.
Demand is constructive through FY2027 if annual revenue forecasts are met. Industry evidence also shows high reinvestment, with capex at 33.6% of revenue and 3.15 times depreciation.
Evidence-backed thesis
Hold because the supported two-year revenue runway is largely balanced by leverage and investment-conversion risk.
Cycle upside
Demand is constructive through FY2027 if annual revenue forecasts are met. Industry evidence also shows high reinvestment, with capex at 33.6% of revenue and 3.15 times depreciation.
Raccomandazione interna
Hold because substantial debt and heavy investment limit the value of the supported outlook until revenue produces earnings per share and free cash flow after capital spending.
§2 Scenario ribassistaEN
The most damaging path combines higher refinancing costs, weaker margins and negative annual free cash flow. Debt then absorbs more operating growth while investment needs force additional borrowing or dilution.
Higher refinancing costs and weaker margins increase external funding needs. This path is confirmed by breaches in debt cost, annual free cash flow or operating margin within 24 months.
Come questa tesi può fallire
Refinancing costs rise
If the pre-tax cost of debt moves above 9.35% within 24 months, higher financing expense could absorb operating growth while the investment programme remains capital intensive.2,3
FY2025 operating cash flow and free cash flow show operating performance, but they do not establish customer protection, switching barriers, franchise rights or a cost advantage. Structural durability therefore remains unresolved.
Profitto economico
Positive FY2025 operating cash flow and free cash flow do not by themselves prove lasting excess returns. Without evidence of structural protection, the duration of value creation remains unresolved.4,5
Peers offer investors alternative utility and generation exposure, which may reduce how much they pay for each dollar of NEE earnings. Direct customer or project losses are not established.
medium
Through FY2027 and beyond
Peer valuation and operating differences can test relative investor appeal, but they cannot establish customer loss or structural protection. Reassess durability only with company evidence of protected customers, switching barriers or cost advantage.
The highlighted cell is Fair value when every assumption sits at its base level ($87.41). Each row and column shows what Fair value becomes when one assumption moves.
Free cash flow to the firm stays positive in the first projected year at $6.0B after modeled reinvestment of $2.4B, with terminal value at 57.3% of enterprise value. A sudden drop in free cash flow is not projected unless capital spending relative to revenue, reinvestment, or gross margin resets materially.
The September FY2027 analyst revenue estimate remained close to the August post-earnings estimate. Growth after FY2027 then fades as a scenario assumption.1
Revenue growth must translate into higher diluted earnings per share while annual free cash flow after capital spending stays positive. The path fails if FY2027 diluted EPS falls below its forecast range or annual free cash flow turns negative.
Revenue growth must produce diluted EPS and free cash flow after capital spending. Extra share issuance would spread earnings across more shares and dilute existing holders.
In linea
Keep the position unchanged if results track forecasts.
FY2025 operating cash flow remained positive after heavy capital spending, but free cash flow was much smaller. A fall below zero would signal greater external funding needs.4,5
Allocazione del capitale
Capital allocation is expansion-led. Capex stayed elevated across FY2023-FY2025, while debt reached $95.62 billion in FY2025. Better free cash flow must accompany any slower investment phase.
The admissible evidence does not establish a dated return-on-invested-capital trajectory. Heavy investment means future returns depend on new assets producing cash without proportional financing needs.
A supported company return comparison is not available; the dated WACC was 7.4345% on 2026-09-08.
Reported profit had strong cash support in FY2025.
Ponte dei flussi di cassaCome il flusso di cassa operativo è diventato flusso di cassa libero nel FY2025.
StockMarketAgent.AI
Riconciliazione del flusso operativo
Utile netto6,8 Mld USDAmmortamenti e svalutazioni+6,6 Mld USDAltre rettifiche operative−930 Mln USDFlusso di cassa operativo12,5 Mld USD
Riconciliazione della liquidità iniziale e finale
Liquidità iniziale1,4 Mld USDFlusso di cassa operativo+12,5 Mld USDFlusso da investimenti−23,9 Mld USDFlusso da finanziamenti+13 Mld USDEffetto dei tassi di cambio+5 Mln USDLiquidità finale3 Mld USD
NextEra Energy Inc. (NEE) trades at 19.3x forward earnings against a peer median of 17.6x. Its EV/EBITDA of 20.0x compares with a peer median of 13.3x. The comparison uses 4 peers: Constellation Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc., The Southern Company and Duke Energy Corporation, as of 2026-09-08.
§10 Settore e cicloEN
Fase del ciclo
Expansion
FY2025 capex was $9.27 billion, while the industry benchmark was 33.6% of revenue and 3.15 times depreciation.3
Ciclo rialzista
Demand is constructive through FY2027 if annual revenue forecasts are met. Industry evidence also shows high reinvestment, with capex at 33.6% of revenue and 3.15 times depreciation.
Ciclo ribassista
The cycle turns harmful if refinancing costs rise while heavy capital spending continues before new assets generate enough cash. This is a conditional risk grounded in FY2025 debt, cash and capex, not an observed outcome.
Trend secolari
Trend
Impatto
Nota
Utility investment intensity
neutral
High industry spending supports asset growth but also increases capital and refinancing risk.
Posizionamento
NEE enters this phase with positive FY2025 free cash flow, but substantial debt makes execution and financing costs decisive.3,4
§11 Gestione della posizioneEN
Dimensionamento
Maintain existing exposure; no portfolio percentage is established. At the September 4, 2026 report-date price, the shares are below the $87.41 Fair value, but the gap is modest. Do not increase exposure until revenue growth translates into higher diluted earnings per share and free cash flow stays positive after capital spending. FY2025 debt was $95.62 billion versus $2.81 billion of cash, and capital spending was $9.27 billion.1,3,4,5
Rischio
Keep exposure unchanged. Reduce if pre-tax debt cost rises above 9.35% within 24 months, annual free cash flow falls below zero, FY2027 diluted EPS falls below $4.23, or GAAP operating margin falls below 27.14%. These breaches would show higher financing burdens or weaker conversion of revenue into earnings and cash after capital spending.
Tranche di ingresso
Livello
Azione
Perché
After two consecutive fiscal years with capex at or below depreciation and improving free cash flow
Reassess whether a larger position is justified.
Lower investment intensity with better cash would show that the build is reaching shareholders.
Reduce exposure if FY2027 diluted EPS falls below $4.23. That breach would show the revenue build is not reaching shareholders as forecast per share.1
§12 Prospettive degli investitoriEN
Existing shareholder
Hold
The report-date price is below Fair value, but the gap is modest and leverage remains material.3
New investor
Hold
Do not initiate solely on forecast revenue growth; wait for stronger evidence that investment converts into free cash flow.4
Risk-sensitive investor
Avoid
High debt, heavy capital spending and refinancing exposure may not fit a defensive mandate.3
§14 Raccomandazione finaleEN
Azione
Mantenere
Hold existing exposure; do not add solely because FY2026-FY2027 revenue forecasts remain constructive.1
Annual revenue forecasts remain constructive through FY2027. FY2025 operating and free cash flow were positive, but debt and capital spending remained substantial. Evidence does not establish long-lasting structural protection.
§15Your notes
Capture your own thesis, position size, and follow-up questions. Stays on this device, only you can see it.
Private notes
Visible only to you. Synced to this device.
0 chars
Sources
The records this analysis drew on, as they stood when it was run.
Not every cited input appears here: internal calculations and intermediate model outputs have no external record, and some citations could not be matched to one.
A fall below zero within 24 months would show that investment spending no longer funds itself, increasing reliance on debt or new shares.3,4
FV impact
-4.8%
The analyst's bear scenario path and multiple as the base case
Trigger
Within 24 months
Operating profitability breaks
A GAAP operating margin below 27.14% within 24 months would show that forecast revenue is arriving with weaker profit, reducing cash available for reinvestment and shareholders.3,5
FV impact
0%
Operating margin 3 points lower throughout
Trigger
Within 24 months
Weaker cash after capital spending would increase reliance on debt or new shares. Issuing new shares would dilute existing holders and reduce their share of future earnings.
Revenue growth must produce diluted EPS, not just higher sales. Weaker diluted EPS would leave less profit for each share and shorten the supported earnings-growth period.
Limitation: Terminal value is 63.2% of this model's value, above the 60% level at which the methodology flags concentration; the value leans on the years beyond the explicit forecast.
Project EPS through the explicit advantage period, fade growth as competition catches up, and discount the full stream at cost of equity.
Limitation: Terminal value is 77.7% of this model's value, above the 60% level at which the methodology flags concentration; the value leans on the years beyond the explicit forecast.
Upside persists if FY2027 diluted EPS remains within its forecast range and annual free cash flow improves after capital spending. It fades if EPS falls below that range or free cash flow turns negative.
Reduce exposure if annual free cash flow falls below zero. The breach would reverse FY2025's positive cash generation after capital spending and require more external financing.