Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
UBER trades against a final fair-value range of $79.84-$160.48, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $79.8, high $160, with mid-point at $120.
Stock analysis

UBER Uber Technologies Inc. fair value $120–$160

UBER
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analizzato: 2026-05-09Prossimo aggiornamento: 2026-08-09Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature compounderNYSE · Industrials
View archive
Prezzo
$75.45
▲ +44.29 (+58.70%)
Valore equo
$120
$120–$160
Valutazione
Acquisto forte
confidence 88/100
Potenziale rialzo
+58.7%
upside to fair value
Margine di Sicurezza
$101.78
buy below · 15%
Capitalizzazione
$153.6B
P/E fwd 17.4
Fallback in ingleseIT
Mostrando la fonte in inglese mentre traduciamo
Questo report non è ancora stato tradotto. Aggiorna tra qualche minuto una volta che la coda di traduzione avrà recuperato.

§1 Sintesi

  • Composite fair value $120 with high case $160.
  • Implied upside of 58.7% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 88/100 · Mature compounder.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$120
Margin of safety
+37.0%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$75.45Price
FV $119.74
High $160.48

UBER trades against a final fair-value range of $79.84-$160.48, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • Massive two-sided network liquidity
    Massive two-sided network liquidity
  • Global scale advantages
    Global scale advantages
  • Cycle upside
    Increasing urban density and shift away from personal car ownership drive structural tailwinds.

§2 Scenario ribassista

A severe macroeconomic contraction coincides with adverse regulatory rulings reclassifying drivers as employees in key jurisdictions, destroying unit economics and forcing aggressive price hikes that crush demand elasticity.

Come questa tesi può fallire

Global Driver Reclassification

· Medium

Major markets mandate employee status for drivers, destroying the variable cost structure and forcing fixed-cost absorption.

FV impact
Severe downside to $60
Trigger
12-24 Months

Autonomous Vehicle Disintermediation

· Low

Well-funded competitors scale proprietary autonomous fleets faster than Uber can integrate them, bypassing the driver network moat.

FV impact
Catastrophic downside to $40
Trigger
36-60 Months

Delivery Take-Rate Collapse

· Medium

Regulatory price caps on restaurant commissions become permanent and widespread, eliminating the profitability of the Delivery segment.

FV impact
Moderate downside to $80
Trigger
12-36 Months
Segnali di allerta precoce da monitorare
MetricaAttualeSoglia di attivazione
Gross bookings growth decelerates below 10% YoY for two consecutive quarters.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
EBITDA margins compress as incentive spend spikes to retain driver supply.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Uber One subscriber growth stalls or churn increases materially.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Take rates decline sequentially in either Mobility or Delivery segments.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Advertising revenue growth fails to outpace underlying delivery volumes.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Storia finanziaria

Conto economico — ultimi sei periodi
VoceT−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
Periodo2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Ricavi$31.88B$37.28B$43.98B$52.02B+17.7%
Utile lordo$12.22B$14.82B$17.33B$20.68B+19.2%
Reddito operativo$-1.83B$1.11B$2.80B$5.57B
Utile netto$-9.14B$1.89B$9.86B$10.05B
EPS (diluito)$-4.65$0.87$4.56$4.73
EBITDA$-7.91B$3.78B$5.39B$6.99B
R&S$2.80B$3.16B$3.11B$3.40B+6.7%
SG&A$7.89B$7.04B$7.98B$8.14B+1.0%

Punteggi di qualità

Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Composito qualità 0–9
Altman Z-score
3.7
Rischio di fallimento (>3 sicuro)
Beneish M-score
-2.3
Rischio di manipolazione degli utili
OCF / Utile netto
1.01×
>1 indica alta qualità degli utili
Soglia di qualità contabile
Pass
Soglia corretta per settore
ROIC
12.6%
Rendimento del capitale investito
Sezione 3

Numbers analysis

Allocazione del capitale

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Abbonati individuali — da §4 in poi11 sezioni in più

Leggi l'analisi completa — 11 sezioni in più.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Report completo per ogni ticker coperto
24 mesi di archivio rating
Briefing della watchlist + avvisi di variazione del rating
Esportazione PDF + DOCX in qualsiasi lingua
Inizia la prova gratuita
Annulla in qualsiasi momento.
FAQ

UBER — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, UBER looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $75.5 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $120 (range $79.8–$160), which implies roughly 58.7% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of UBER also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder
Same sector: Industrials