Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
UBER trades against a final fair-value range of $79.84-$160.48, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $79.8, high $160, with mid-point at $120.
Stock analysis

UBER Uber Technologies Inc. fair value $120–$160

UBER
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Przeanalizowano: 2026-05-09Następna aktualizacja: 2026-08-09Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature compounderNYSE · Industrials
View archive
Cena
$75.45
▲ +44.29 (+58.70%)
Wartość godziwa
$120
$120–$160
Rekomendacja
Zdecydowanie kupuj
confidence 88/100
Potencjał wzrostu
+58.7%
upside to fair value
Margines Bezpieczeństwa
$101.78
buy below · 15%
Kapitalizacja
$153.6B
P/E fwd 17.4
Awaryjny angielskiPL
Pokazujemy źródło angielskie podczas tłumaczenia
Ten raport nie został jeszcze przetłumaczony. Odśwież za kilka minut, gdy kolejka tłumaczeń go przetworzy.

§1 Podsumowanie wykonawcze

  • Composite fair value $120 with high case $160.
  • Implied upside of 58.7% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 88/100 · Mature compounder.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$120
Margin of safety
+37.0%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$75.45Price
FV $119.74
High $160.48

UBER trades against a final fair-value range of $79.84-$160.48, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • Massive two-sided network liquidity
    Massive two-sided network liquidity
  • Global scale advantages
    Global scale advantages
  • Cycle upside
    Increasing urban density and shift away from personal car ownership drive structural tailwinds.

§2 Scenariusz negatywny

A severe macroeconomic contraction coincides with adverse regulatory rulings reclassifying drivers as employees in key jurisdictions, destroying unit economics and forcing aggressive price hikes that crush demand elasticity.

Jak ta teza może się załamać

Global Driver Reclassification

· Medium

Major markets mandate employee status for drivers, destroying the variable cost structure and forcing fixed-cost absorption.

FV impact
Severe downside to $60
Trigger
12-24 Months

Autonomous Vehicle Disintermediation

· Low

Well-funded competitors scale proprietary autonomous fleets faster than Uber can integrate them, bypassing the driver network moat.

FV impact
Catastrophic downside to $40
Trigger
36-60 Months

Delivery Take-Rate Collapse

· Medium

Regulatory price caps on restaurant commissions become permanent and widespread, eliminating the profitability of the Delivery segment.

FV impact
Moderate downside to $80
Trigger
12-36 Months
Sygnały wczesnego ostrzegania do monitorowania
WskaźnikBieżącyPróg wyzwalania
Gross bookings growth decelerates below 10% YoY for two consecutive quarters.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
EBITDA margins compress as incentive spend spikes to retain driver supply.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Uber One subscriber growth stalls or churn increases materially.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Take rates decline sequentially in either Mobility or Delivery segments.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Advertising revenue growth fails to outpace underlying delivery volumes.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Historia finansowa

Rachunek zysków i strat — ostatnich sześć okresów
PozycjaT−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
Okres2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Przychody$31.88B$37.28B$43.98B$52.02B+17.7%
Zysk brutto$12.22B$14.82B$17.33B$20.68B+19.2%
Zysk operacyjny$-1.83B$1.11B$2.80B$5.57B
Zysk netto$-9.14B$1.89B$9.86B$10.05B
EPS (rozwodniony)$-4.65$0.87$4.56$4.73
EBITDA$-7.91B$3.78B$5.39B$6.99B
R&D$2.80B$3.16B$3.11B$3.40B+6.7%
SG&A$7.89B$7.04B$7.98B$8.14B+1.0%

Wyniki jakości

Wskaźnik Piotroski F
6 / 9
Złożony wynik jakości 0–9
Wskaźnik Altman Z
3.7
Ryzyko upadłości (>3 bezpieczne)
Wskaźnik Beneish M
-2.3
Ryzyko manipulacji wynikami
OCF / Zysk netto
1.01×
>1 wskazuje wysoką jakość wyników
Bramka jakości księgowej
Pass
Bramka skorygowana o sektor
ROIC
12.6%
Zwrot z zainwestowanego kapitału
Sekcja 3

Numbers analysis

Alokacja kapitału

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Subskrybenci indywidualni — od §411 kolejnych sekcji

Przeczytaj pełną analizę — 11 kolejnych sekcji.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Pełny raport dla każdego pokrytego tickera
24 miesiące archiwum rekomendacji
Briefingi watchlisty + alerty zmian rekomendacji
Eksport PDF + DOCX w dowolnym języku
Rozpocznij darmowy okres próbny
Anuluj w dowolnym momencie.
FAQ

UBER — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, UBER looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $75.5 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $120 (range $79.8–$160), which implies roughly 58.7% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of UBER also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder
Same sector: Industrials