Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
ON trades against a final fair-value range of $17.19-$28.02, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $17.2, high $28.0, with mid-point at $22.4.
Stock analysis

ON ON Semiconductor Corporation fair value $22–$28

ON
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
已分析: 2026-05-10下次更新: 2026-08-10Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature compounderNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
股价
$103.20
▼ -80.80 (-78.29%)
公允价值
$22
$22–$28
评级
卖出
confidence 45/100
上行空间
-78.3%
upside to fair value
安全边际
$19.04
buy below · 15%
市值
$40.4B
P/E fwd 24.2
英文原文ZH
翻译期间显示英文原文
此报告尚未翻译。翻译队列赶上后请在几分钟内刷新。

§1 执行摘要

  • Composite fair value $22 with high case $28.
  • Implied downside of 78.3% to fair value.
  • Moat 6.5/10 · confidence 45/100 · Mature compounder.
  • Currently screens above fair value, so patience matters more than entry speed.
Fair value
$22
Margin of safety
-360.7%
Confidence
45/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$103.20Price
FV $22.40
High $28.02

ON trades against a final fair-value range of $17.19-$28.02, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • High switching costs in automotive
    High switching costs in automotive and industrial design wins.
  • Scale advantages and specialized internal
    Scale advantages and specialized internal manufacturing capabilities.
  • Cycle upside
    Accelerating EV adoption and factory automation drive tight power semiconductor supply.

§2 看空情景

A protracted global manufacturing recession coupled with stalled EV adoption permanently impairs revenue growthRevenue growthYear-over-year change in revenue, expressed as a percentage. The starting point for any forward-earnings model and the lens through which scale, mix, and pricing power become visible. to low single digits. Structural capexCapital expendituresCash spent on acquiring or upgrading property, plant, and equipment. Splits into maintenance capex (sustaining current capacity) and growth capex (expanding capacity). requirements for underutilized SiC fabs drag free cash flow conversion below historical averages, compressing the terminal multipleTerminal multipleThe exit P/E or EV/EBITDA we apply to the final year of an explicit forecast. Anchored to the business's long-run quality and the prevailing risk-free rate. to 12x.

该论点可能失败的方式

SiC Commoditization

· Medium

Aggressive capacity expansion by competitors commoditizes the SiC power market, driving gross margins permanently below 30%.

FV impact
Severe

Prolonged Auto Downturn

· High

Global auto production volumes decline and EV penetration plateaus, leaving ON with significant stranded fab capacity.

FV impact
High

Structural Capex Escalation

· Medium

Next-generation SiC node migrations require higher-than-expected capital intensity, permanently suppressing FCF generation despite revenue growth.

FV impact
Moderate
需关注的早期预警信号
指标当前触发阈值
Gross margin structurally declining below 35 percent.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Capex-to-revenue ratio exceeding 20 percent for consecutive quarters.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Deteriorating market share in global EV silicon carbide design wins.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Inventory days outstanding rising above 150 days systemically.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Management officially walking back long-term free cash flow margin targets.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 财务历史

损益表 — 最近六期
项目T−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
期间2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
营业收入$8.33B$8.25B$7.08B$6.00B-10.4%
毛利$4.08B$3.88B$3.22B$1.98B-21.3%
营业利润$2.76B$2.61B$1.90B$751.1M-35.2%
净利润$1.90B$2.18B$1.57B$121.0M-60.1%
每股收益(摊薄)$4.24$4.89$3.63$0.29-59.1%
EBITDA$3.01B$3.22B$2.54B$888.2M-33.4%
研发$600.2M$577.3M$612.7M$583.6M-0.9%
销售管理费用$631.1M$641.5M$649.8M$604.8M-1.4%

质量评分

OCF / 净利润
14.54×
>1 表示盈利质量高
会计质量门槛
Fail
经行业调整门槛
ROIC
1.5%
投入资本回报率
第 3 节

Numbers analysis

个人订阅用户 — §4 及之后还有 11 个章节

阅读完整分析 — 还有 11 个章节。

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

涵盖每个股票的完整报告
24 个月的评级存档
关注列表简报 + 评级变更提醒
以任意语言导出 PDF + DOCX
开始免费试用
可随时取消。
FAQ

ON — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, ON looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $103 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $22.4 (range $17.2–$28.0), which implies roughly 78.3% downside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of ON also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder
Same sector: Information Technology