Mit Ihrer Erlaubnis verwenden wir datenschutzfreundliche Analysen, um zu verstehen, welche Recherchewege funktionieren. Wir verwenden weder Werbe-Tracker noch Sitzungsaufzeichnungen. Sie können diese Auswahl in den Einstellungen ändern. Lesen Sie die Datenschutzerklärung.
Quote this valuation with its source: Fair value, Potential value and the price at analysis.
FAQ
VZ — frequently asked questions
Is Verizon Communications Inc. overvalued?
In our latest published analysis dated 2026-09-09, VZ looks meaningfully undervalued. The price recorded at analysis is 50,4 USD versus our fair value of 78,2 USD; the high endpoint is presented separately as potential value of 161 USD. That implies roughly 55.1% upside to fair value at that date.
Our latest published report, analyzed 2026-09-09, gives VZ a fair value of 78,2 USD and a potential value of 161 USD. The conclusion is triangulated across multiple valuation models and weighted by reliability for Verizon Communications Inc.'s archetype; it is a dated research output, not a live price.
Should I buy VZ now?
Our latest published rating for VZ, analyzed 2026-09-09, is Strong Buy. Verizon Communications Inc. looks meaningfully undervalued at the analysis-date price of 50,4 USD versus fair value of 78,2 USD; potential value is 161 USD. This is research for educational purposes, not personalized investment advice.
What are the biggest risks for VZ?
The dedicated bear-case section in our report analyzed 2026-09-09 documents Verizon Communications Inc.'s material risks, evidence, thresholds, and thesis-invalidation conditions. Scenario-specific explanations remain in that section so the report does not repeat or decontextualize them elsewhere.
What is VZ's rating?
Our latest published rating for VZ, analyzed 2026-09-09, is Strong Buy, with a published moat assessment of 1/10 (None). It reflects our fair value of 78,2 USD, the potential value of 161 USD, and the price recorded at analysis (50,4 USD).
Englische Quelle wird angezeigt, während wir übersetzen
Dieser Bericht wurde noch nicht übersetzt. Aktualisieren Sie in ein paar Minuten, sobald die Übersetzungswarteschlange aufgeholt hat.
§1 ZusammenfassungEN
30-Sekunden-AntwortStrong Buy
Preis im Verhältnis zum Wert
Kurs
$50.41
Fairer Wert
$78.19
Potenzialwert
$161.26
Stand
2026-09-08
Warum es funktionieren kann
Upside requires the FY2027 revenue and earnings estimates to be met and operating cash after capital spending to recur.
Was unsere Einschätzung ändern würde
Free cash flow remains below cash dividends, or coverage stays below 1.0x, for two consecutive fiscal years.
Strong Buy: at the report-date price of $50.41, Verizon trades below Fair value of $78.19 and Potential value of $161.26.3
The main risk is dividend coverage. If free cash flow stays below cash dividends for two consecutive fiscal years, capital spending and financing could force dividend growth to stop or the payout to fall.3
The clearest upside is sustained cash after network investment. Combined with the FY2027 earnings recovery, that cash could support dividends and debt reduction, raising value per share.
A better demand period would appear as sustained revenue growth with stable operating margin. That combination would raise operating profit and cash available after network investment.1
Evidence-backed thesis
Strong Buy because the report-date price is below Fair value while operating cash supports the distribution after capital spending.3,4
Cycle upside
A better demand period would require FY2027 revenue delivery and operating margin holding near the FY2025 level. That combination would raise operating profit and leave more cash after network investment.1,4
Hausempfehlung
Strong Buy. The report-date price is below Fair value, and that gap is the basis for the rating. The view holds while cash after capital spending supports dividends and debt reduction; repeated dividend-coverage failure would weaken it.3,4
Unternehmensüberblick
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC provides these products and services to businesses, public sector customers and wireless and wireline carriers across the U.S. and a subset of these products and services to customers around the world.
§2 BärenszenarioEN
If consolidated revenue growth stays below 0.5% and operating margin stays below 18% for two fiscal years, sales and profit would weaken together. If pre-tax debt cost also exceeds 7.78% while dividend coverage remains below 1.0x for two fiscal years, creditors and capital spending would absorb more cash before shareholders benefit.
This path would be confirmed by weaker dividend coverage, persistent margin pressure, or higher refinancing costs by FY2027. It would be disconfirmed by stable cash coverage and visible debt reduction.
Wie diese These scheitern kann
Dividend coverage failure
Coverage below 1.0x for two consecutive fiscal years would halt dividend growth or force a cut as capital spending and financing consume residual cash.
FV impact
-5.2%
The analyst's bear scenario path and multiple as the base case
Consolidated revenue growth below 0.5% for two consecutive fiscal years would weaken the earnings recovery and reduce cash available for shareholders.
Frühwarnsignale zur Überwachung
Die fünf Entwicklungen, die unsere Anlagethese schwächen würden.
01
Dividend cash coverage
The breach would leave the distribution dependent on borrowing or reduced investment, weakening dividend durability and limiting balance-sheet repair.
Aktuell:FY2025 operating cash flow was $37.14 billion and capital spending was $17.01 billion.
Alarm, wennFree cash flow below cash dividends, or coverage below 1.0x, for two consecutive fiscal years.
02
§3 WettbewerbsgrabenEN
None
The available evidence is insufficient to determine whether Verizon has durable switching costs, customer-retention advantages, network-scale economics, a lasting cost edge, or strong barriers to entry. The supplied peer data cover outcomes, not those structural mechanisms.
The peer set shows wide differences in growth, margins, and valuation. That dispersion supports competitive stress testing, but not a claim that every peer has the same business model.
Ökonomischer Gewinn
The 5.6628% WACC is a hurdle rate, not evidence that returns exceed it over time. Economic-profit durability is therefore unproven.2
1/ 10
None
Bekannte Bedrohungen für den Wettbewerbsvorteil
Bedrohung
Schweregrad
Zeitrahmen
Minderung
TMUS and T are the closest wireless comparisons, but their growth profiles differ. Their presence can increase promotion and retention spending.
high
Through FY2027 and beyond
The FY2027 revenue estimate is $143.59 billion. That forecast level does not establish durable market-share gains.1
CMCSA is an adjacent connectivity comparison, while DIS tests consumer-wallet competition. Neither is interchangeable with a wireless carrier.
medium
Medium term
Judge the threat through Verizon's revenue and operating margin rather than peer identity alone.
The highlighted cell is Fair value when every assumption sits at its base level ($78.19). Each row and column shows what Fair value becomes when one assumption moves.
Free cash flow to the firm stays positive in the first projected year at $25.9B after modeled capex of $14.7B, with terminal value at 66.7% of enterprise value. A sudden drop in free cash flow is not projected unless capital spending relative to revenue, reinvestment, or gross margin resets materially.
FY2027 revenue and earnings must be delivered, and operating cash after capital spending must recur before dividends and debt reduction can improve together.
§7 Entscheidungsbaum für ErgebnisseEN
Übertroffen
Maintain Strong Buy if the operating beat also improves cash after network investment.
Judge a sales beat by whether cash after network investment also rises. Capital spending is a separate claim on operating cash.
Im Plan
Maintain Strong Buy if revenue and diluted earnings per share align with FY2027 estimates, while operating margin and cash after capital spending remain near the FY2025 baseline. Reconsider if those measures materially improve or weaken, or if dividend coverage or pre-tax debt cost deteriorates.
Such a miss would reduce earnings and distributable cash. Pricing, promotions, or retention spending would be hypotheses to test, not causes established in advance.
Ergebnisqualität
Operating cash exceeded reported profit in FY2025, but the large debt balance means strong cash reporting does not remove balance-sheet risk.3,4
FY2025 operating cash of $37.14 billion exceeded capital spending of $17.01 billion. This supports distributions, but the $200.59 billion debt balance keeps refinancing risk material.3,4
Kapitalallokation
The priority is balancing network investment, dividends, and debt reduction. The $200.59 billion FY2025 debt balance means stronger operations may benefit creditors before equity holders.
A multi-year return-on-invested-capital trajectory is not used to support the thesis. The report instead relies on dated operating profit, cash flow, and investment evidence.
The established WACC was 5.6628% on 2026-09-09; no comparable cited multi-year ROIC series is used to claim a durable spread.
FY2025 operating cash exceeded reported profit.
FY2025 operating cash was $37.14 billion, versus net income of $17.17 billion.
This supports cash generation, but operating cash alone does not establish dividend coverage. Capital spending and debt remain competing claims on cash.
FY2027 revenue expectations are above FY2025 reported revenue.
The FY2027 revenue estimate was $143.59 billion and diluted EPS was $5.28 as of 2026-09-09.
Jüngster Umsatz138,2 Mrd. $Umsatz-CAGR +1,0 %
Betriebsmarge21,2 %10 Geschäftsjahresperioden
Jüngster freier Cashflow20,1 Mrd. $FY2025
Nettoverschuldung181,5 Mrd. $FY2025
Aufschlüsselung der Gewinn- und VerlustrechnungWie sich die Unternehmensgröße in ausgewiesenen Gewinn übersetzt.
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) trades at 9.4x forward earnings against a peer median of 11.3x. Its EV/EBITDA of 7.9x compares with a peer median of 8.3x. The comparison uses 4 peers: T-Mobile US Inc., AT&T Inc., The Walt Disney Company and Comcast Corporation, as of 2026-09-09.
§10 Branche & ZyklusEN
Zyklusphase
Contraction
The industry benchmark was 0.9% capital spending to revenue and 1.05x capital spending to depreciation as of 2026-09-01.
Bullenzyklus
A better demand period would require FY2027 revenue delivery and operating margin holding near the FY2025 level. If operating cash also exceeds capital spending, more cash could remain after network investment.
Bärenzyklus
A weaker period would show up as slower revenue growth and lower operating margin. Those results would reduce earnings and cash. Promotions, pricing, and retention spending would be possible explanations to test, not established causes.
Säkulare Trends
Trend
Auswirkung
Hinweis
Low-growth connectivity demand
neutral
FY2027 revenue is estimated at $143.59 billion. That single forecast level does not establish continued demand or a high-growth path.
Persistent capital needs
negative
FY2025 capital spending of $17.01 billion absorbed a substantial share of operating cash before distributions and debt reduction.
Positionierung
FY2025 operating cash was $37.14 billion, while debt was $200.59 billion. The debt balance means cash must also serve financing claims if demand weakens.3,4
§11 PositionsmanagementEN
Positionsgröße
Build toward a core position while keeping size below the portfolio maximum, consistent with the Strong Buy rating. Adding beyond that requires revenue, margin, dividend coverage, and debt to improve together. Reassess or trim if revenue growth is below 0.5% for two fiscal years, margin is below 18% for two years, or dividend coverage is below 1.0x for two years. Also reassess if pre-tax debt cost exceeds 7.78% while debt remains substantial.
Risiko
Keep position size below the portfolio maximum until dividend coverage, revenue delivery, and debt reduction are visible together.
Einstiegstranchen
Niveau
Aktion
Warum
At the report-date price of $50.41
Initiate or add at or below the report-date price, which sits below Fair value. Stage purchases and keep room to add as revenue, margin, dividend coverage, and debt improve together. Reassess or trim if revenue growth, operating margin, or dividend coverage breaches its two-year threshold, or if pre-tax debt cost exceeds 7.78% while debt remains substantial. Also reassess after a material improvement or weakening in revenue, diluted earnings per share, operating margin, or cash after capital spending.
A lower price does not remove operating and refinancing risks, so stage entry and watch the revenue, margin, dividend-coverage, and debt evidence that would weaken the rating.
At Potential value, reassess whether the upside case still holds, including revenue, diluted earnings per share, operating margin, cash after capital spending, dividend coverage, and debt cost. Trim if revenue growth is below 0.5% for two fiscal years, margin is below 18% for two years, or dividend coverage is below 1.0x for two years. Also trim if pre-tax debt cost exceeds 7.78% while debt remains substantial.
Exit because the distribution thesis would be broken.
§12 Investoren-PerspektivenEN
Income investor
Buy
FY2025 operating cash and capital spending support the distribution, although leverage requires ongoing coverage checks.3,4
Total-return investor
Buy
The report-date price is below Fair value, and FY2027 estimates provide a dated recovery anchor.1,3
Risk-aware investor
Buy
Use staged purchases because debt, capital needs, and valuation dispersion make the path uneven.3
§14 Endgültige EmpfehlungEN
Aktion
Starker Kauf
Strong Buy; the report-date price sits below Fair value while operating cash after capital spending supports the distribution. Recurring capital spending and debt remain competing claims on that cash, so track revenue, margin, dividend coverage, and debt evidence.3
The valuation gap is attractive, but dividend coverage and refinancing costs must remain within the stated limits.
§15Your notes
Capture your own thesis, position size, and follow-up questions. Stays on this device, only you can see it.
Private notes
Visible only to you. Synced to this device.
0 chars
Sources
The records this analysis drew on, as they stood when it was run.
Not every cited input appears here: internal calculations and intermediate model outputs have no external record, and some citations could not be matched to one.
An operating margin below 18% for two consecutive fiscal years would indicate that pricing pressure and retention costs are eroding profit and cash generation.
FV impact
0%
Operating margin 3 points lower throughout
Trigger
Within 24 months
Refinancing costs rise
A pre-tax debt cost above 7.78% while debt remains substantial would divert more cash to creditors and reduce dividend and deleveraging capacity.
FV impact
-25.5%
Cost of capital 2 points higher
Trigger
Within 36 months
Earnings multiple compresses
A forward or terminal earnings multiple below 8x would show that investors are paying less for each dollar of future earnings.
A sustained margin loss would reduce operating profit and cash after investment. Pricing, promotions, or retention spending would be possible explanations to test, not causes established by the breach alone.
Alarm, wennConsolidated operating margin below 18% for two consecutive fiscal years.
04
Pre-tax debt cost
Higher refinancing expense would transfer more operating cash to creditors, slowing debt reduction and reducing room for dividends or network investment.
Aktuell:The pre-tax cost of debt was 5.78% on 2026-09-09.
Alarm, wennPre-tax cost of debt above 7.78% while the debt balance remains substantial.
Such compression would reduce value per share because investors would pay less for each dollar of future earnings. It would not, by itself, establish whether growth or leverage caused the change.
Aktuell:The forward price-to-earnings multiple was 9.41x on 2026-09-09.
Alarm, wennForward or terminal price-to-earnings multiple below 8x within 24 months.
Limitation: Terminal value is 66.7% of this model's value, above the 60% level at which the methodology flags concentration; the value leans on the years beyond the explicit forecast.
Limitation: Terminal value is 78.2% of this model's value, above the 60% level at which the methodology flags concentration; the value leans on the years beyond the explicit forecast.
Use FY2027 results to test whether the cited revenue and earnings estimates are met, operating cash continues to exceed capital spending, and debt declines. A weaker margin or debt remaining substantial by FY2027 would reject this path.1,3,4
AktuellThe FY2027 estimate supports improvement.
Warum es wichtig ist
Earnings must rise faster than sales without relying on unsupported margin expansion.1
The checkpoints are FY2027 revenue and EPS versus those estimates, plus operating profit, operating cash, and capital spending versus their FY2025 levels.