Avec votre autorisation, nous utilisons une analyse limitée et respectueuse de la vie privée pour comprendre les parcours de recherche utiles. Nous n’utilisons ni traceurs publicitaires ni enregistrement de session. Vous pouvez modifier ce choix dans les préférences. Consultez la Politique de confidentialité.
Quote this valuation with its source: Fair value, Potential value and the price at analysis.
FAQ
PLTR — frequently asked questions
Is Palantir Technologies Inc. overvalued?
In our latest published analysis dated 2026-09-08, PLTR looks meaningfully overvalued. The price recorded at analysis is 174 USD versus our fair value of 76,6 USD; the high endpoint is presented separately as potential value of 99,3 USD. That implies roughly 56.0% downside to fair value at that date.
Our latest published report, analyzed 2026-09-08, gives PLTR a fair value of 76,6 USD and a potential value of 99,3 USD. The conclusion is triangulated across multiple valuation models and weighted by reliability for Palantir Technologies Inc.'s archetype; it is a dated research output, not a live price.
Should I buy PLTR now?
Our latest published rating for PLTR, analyzed 2026-09-08, is Sell. Palantir Technologies Inc. looks meaningfully overvalued at the analysis-date price of 174 USD versus fair value of 76,6 USD; potential value is 99,3 USD. This is research for educational purposes, not personalized investment advice.
What are the biggest risks for PLTR?
The dedicated bear-case section in our report analyzed 2026-09-08 documents Palantir Technologies Inc.'s material risks, evidence, thresholds, and thesis-invalidation conditions. Scenario-specific explanations remain in that section so the report does not repeat or decontextualize them elsewhere.
What is PLTR's rating?
Our latest published rating for PLTR, analyzed 2026-09-08, is Sell, with a published moat assessment of 1/10 (None). It reflects our fair value of 76,6 USD, the potential value of 99,3 USD, and the price recorded at analysis (174 USD).
Affichage de la source anglaise pendant la traduction
Ce rapport n'a pas encore été traduit. Actualisez dans quelques minutes une fois que la file d'attente de traduction aura rattrapé son retard.
§1 RésuméEN
Réponse en 30 secondesSell
Prix par rapport à la valeur
Cours
$174.33
Juste valeur
$76.62
Valeur potentielle
$99.26
Au
2026-09-04
Pourquoi le scénario peut fonctionner
The clearest opportunity is that upward annual revenue estimates become reported sales.
Ce qui changerait notre avis
FY2027 revenue falls below $10.84 billion, the bottom of the analyst estimate range as of 2026-09-08.
Sell. The report was prepared at $174.33 on 2026-09-04, versus $76.62 Fair value and $99.26 Potential value as of 2026-09-08.3
The report-date price stood above both public valuation points, leaving a 56.05% decline to Fair value.3
The main risk is FY2027 revenue below $10.84 billion. That would require lower later sales assumptions and leave fewer sales over which to spread operating costs.
The clearest upside is that post-event annual revenue estimates become reported sales. If both operating groups contribute and costs rise more slowly, FY2025 profitability and cash generation could support faster profit and cash growth.1,5
Cycle upside
Industry capital spending equalled 17.8% of revenue, while capital spending was 2.45 times depreciation as of 2026-09-01. That supports an expansion setting for technology investment.
Industry capital spending equalled 17.8% of revenue, while capital spending was 2.45 times depreciation as of 2026-09-01. That supports an expansion setting for technology investment.
Despite their differences, Gotham and Foundry both serve as central operating systems for its customers. While they vary in specific functionality, they align in approach. AIP provides an integrated architecture to Gotham and Foundry that can bring AI to every decision. Palantir Technologies Inc. has always prioritized meeting its customers wherever they need us most. Palantir Technologies Inc. originallies built Apollo to enable the continuous delivery of its software wherever its customers are: in the cloud, on-premises, or even more rugged environments.
Today, Apollo enables the rapid, secure delivery of its software and updates across its business, and also enables its customers to securely deploy their own software in virtually any environment. Segment profitability is evaluated based on contribution and contribution margin. Contribution is segment revenue less the related costs of revenue and sales and marketing expenses, excluding stock-based compensation expense.
§2 Cas baissierEN
The central stress combines three breaches: FY2027 revenue falls below $10.84 billion, normalized operating margin stays below 31% for two fiscal years, and annual diluted-share growth exceeds 8% for two fiscal years. Lower sales and margins would reduce profit, while excess dilution would spread that profit across more shares.
FY2027 revenue misses the low estimate, profit margin stays below its test for two years, or annual share growth breaches its limit for two years.
Lower revenue would leave fewer sales to cover fixed costs, while faster share issuance would spread profit across more shares. This path is confirmed if the cited revenue, margin, or dilution conditions occur.
A breach would force the revenue assumptions used for later years to reset, lowering projected sales, fixed-cost absorption, earnings, and cash generation.
Actuel :$12.18 billion mean estimate for FY2027, as of 2026-09-08.
Alerte siBelow $10.84 billion for FY2027, assessed within 18 months.
02
§3 Avantage concurrentielEN
None
No qualifying structural moat source is established. Profit growth and cash generation show execution, but they do not prove switching costs, integration advantages, scale benefits, or another durable barrier.
PANW and CRWD are high-multiple software alternatives, ANET is a profitable growth-infrastructure alternative, and ORCL is a mature lower-multiple option. Their product overlap is not established, so they serve only as valuation and budget comparisons.
The highlighted cell is Fair value when every assumption sits at its base level ($76.62). Each row and column shows what Fair value becomes when one assumption moves.
Free cash flow to the firm stays positive in the first projected year at $2.5B after modeled reinvestment of $13.3M, with terminal value at 62.7% of enterprise value. A sudden drop in free cash flow is not projected unless capital spending relative to revenue, reinvestment, or gross margin resets materially.
Confirmation requires the FY2026 and FY2027 analyst revenue forecasts to be met. This path weakens if reported revenue misses those forecasts or operating profit fails to rise as sales grow through FY2027.1
Adjusted-EPS growth follows the Bull path through FY2030, and investors continue supporting the Bull earnings multiple.
This path requires the post-event FY2027 revenue revision to become reported sales and the Bull earnings path to hold through FY2030. It weakens if the FY2027 revenue estimate is not met.
§7 Arbre de décision sur les résultatsEN
Dépassé
Do not add shares; use a strong price reaction to reduce exposure.
A miss would put the FY2027 revenue and EPS expectations at risk. Lower sales would weaken fixed-cost absorption, while faster share growth would reduce earnings per share.
Low physical capital needs support cash generation, but equity compensation remains the main allocation concern. Reducing stock-based compensation and diluted-share growth would improve shareholder capture.
FY2025 operating income and cash flow show stronger operating economics, but those outcomes alone do not establish a comparable multi-year return-on-capital trend.
The report uses a 10.793% WACC as of 2026-09-08. It does not present the operating outcomes as a measured return-on-capital spread.
If sales continue to outpace operating costs, earnings could grow faster.
Per-share capture remains incomplete.
FY2025 stock-based compensation was $684.03 million, while diluted average shares had risen since FY2023.
Enterprise growth may not translate proportionally into earnings and value per share.
Dernier chiffre d’affaires4,5 Md $USTCAC du chiffre d’affaires +33,4 %
Marge opérationnelle31,6 %9 périodes fiscales
Dernier flux de trésorerie disponible2,1 Md $USFY2025
Trésorerie nette6,9 Md $USFY2025
Décomposition du compte de résultatComment la taille de l’activité se traduit en bénéfice publié.
StockMarketAgent.AI
Chiffre d'affaires4,5 Md $USCoût des ventes−789,2 M $USMarge brute3,7 Md $USCharges d’exploitation−2,3 Md $USRésultat d'exploitation1,4 Md $USÉléments hors exploitation et impôts+211 M $USRésultat net1,6 Md $US
Données de l’historique financier
Chiffre d'affaires
4 475 446 000 $US
Coût des ventes
789 177 000 $US
Marge brute
3 686 269 000 $US
Charges d’exploitation
2 272 254 000 $US
Résultat d'exploitation
1 414 015 000 $US
Éléments hors exploitation et impôts
211 018 000 $US
Résultat net
1 625 033 000 $US
Aperçu du bilanComment les actifs publiés sont détenus et financés pour la période sélectionnée.
StockMarketAgent.AI
Composition des actifsFinancé par
Total de l’actif8,9 Md $USTrésorerie1,4 Md $USActifs courants8,4 Md $USTotal du passif1,4 Md $USPassifs courants1,2 Md $USCapitaux propres7,5 Md $US
Données de ventilation du bilan
Total de l’actif
8 900 392 000 $US
Trésorerie
1 423 796 000 $US
Actifs courants
8 358 174 000 $US
Total du passif
1 412 381 000 $US
Passifs courants
1 175 581 000 $US
Capitaux propres
7 488 011 000 $US
Passerelle des flux de trésorerieComment le flux de trésorerie d’exploitation est devenu du flux de trésorerie disponible en FY2025.
StockMarketAgent.AI
Rapprochement des flux d’exploitation
Résultat net1,6 Md $USDotations aux amortissements+26,1 M $USRémunération en actions+684 M $USAutres ajustements opérationnels−200,7 M $USFlux de trésorerie d'exploitation2,1 Md $US
Rapprochement de la trésorerie d’ouverture à la clôture
Trésorerie d’ouverture2,1 Md $USFlux de trésorerie d'exploitation+2,1 Md $USFlux d’investissement−2,8 Md $USFlux de financement−26,9 M $USEffet de change+7,5 M $USTrésorerie de clôture1,5 Md $US
2,1 Md $US − 33,9 M $USFlux de trésorerie disponible 2,1 Md $US
Données de la passerelle des flux de trésorerie
Résultat net
1 625 033 000 $US
Entrées d’exploitation
2 335 211 000 $US
Dotations aux amortissements
26 145 000 $US
Rémunération en actions
684 033 000 $US
Flux de trésorerie d'exploitation
2 134 473 000 $US
Sorties d’exploitation
200 738 000 $US
Trésorerie disponible
4 261 886 000 $US
Trésorerie d’ouverture
2 119 936 000 $US
Effet de change
7 477 000 $US
Sorties d’investissement
2 783 551 000 $US
Capex
33 882 000 $US
Autres activités d’investissement
2 749 669 000 $US
Sorties de financement
26 910 000 $US
Trésorerie de clôture
1 451 425 000 $US
Flux d’investissement
-2 783 551 000 $US
Flux de financement
-26 910 000 $US
Chiffre d’affaires par secteur opérationnelPart du chiffre d’affaires total pour 2025-12-31.
4,5 Md $USChiffre d’affaires total
Chiffre d’affaires par secteur opérationnelPart
Government Operating2,4 Md $US53,7 %+53,1 % sur un an
Commercial2,1 Md $US46,3 %+60 % sur un an
Source: SEC EDGAR · Déposé le 2026-02-17 · SEC EDGAR
Données de répartition du chiffre d’affaires: Chiffre d’affaires par secteur opérationnel
Chiffre d’affaires par secteur opérationnel
Chiffre d'affaires
Part
sur un an
Government Operating
2,4 Md $US
53,7 %
53,1 %
Commercial
2,1 Md $US
46,3 %
60 %
Chiffre d’affaires et résultatsComment la taille de l’activité se traduit en bénéfice publié.
Trésorerie et detteLiquidités disponibles face à l’endettement total.
Génération de trésorerieFlux de trésorerie d’exploitation comparé au flux de trésorerie disponible.
RentabilitéÉvolution des marges brute, opérationnelle et nette.
Données financières ponctuelles utilisées dans l’analyse du 2026-09-08.
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) trades at 81.3x forward earnings against a peer median of 52.8x. Its EV/EBITDA of 153.9x compares with a peer median of 49.8x. The comparison uses 4 peers: Palo Alto Networks Inc., Arista Networks Inc., CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. and Oracle Corporation, as of 2026-09-05 to 2026-09-07.
§10 Secteur et cycleEN
Phase du cycle
Expansion
Industry capital spending was 17.8% of revenue and 2.45 times depreciation as of 2026-09-01.
Cycle haussier
Industry capital spending equalled 17.8% of revenue, while capital spending was 2.45 times depreciation as of 2026-09-01. That supports an expansion setting for technology investment.
Cycle baissier
The cycle view remains demand-led and evidence-limited. If enterprise and government budgets weaken together, both operating groups could slow and fixed costs would absorb more revenue.
Tendances séculaires
Tendance
Impact
Note
Commercial software adoption
positive
Faster Commercial growth would broaden revenue and improve fixed-cost absorption.
Government technology demand
positive
Government Operating provides a large starting revenue base, reducing reliance on Commercial alone.
Positionnement
Government Operating contributed $2.40 billion and Commercial $2.07 billion in FY2025. The outlook assumes both groups contribute; a government slowdown would increase the Commercial growth needed to reach the FY2027 revenue estimate.1,6
§11 Gestion de positionEN
Taille de position
No new allocation. The report-date price of $174.33 stands above the $76.62 Fair value and $99.26 Potential value.3
Risque
Do not increase exposure solely because estimates rise. Require reported revenue, margin stability, and slower dilution before reconsidering the Sell stance.
Tranches d'entrée
Niveau
Action
Pourquoi
At or above $76.62 Fair value
Avoid initiating exposure.
The valuation does not provide a supported entry margin, even if estimate revisions remain positive.
Exit remaining exposure if FY2027 revenue falls below $10.84 billion. That breach breaks the final explicit annual revenue anchor and forces the later sales path to reset.
Not every cited input appears here: internal calculations and intermediate model outputs have no external record, and some citations could not be matched to one.
Normalized operating margin below 31% for two consecutive fiscal years would show that expenses are absorbing growth rather than creating greater profit.5
Annual diluted-share growth above 8% for two consecutive fiscal years would cause business gains to translate into materially weaker earnings per share.5
FV impact
-9.4%
The analyst's bear scenario path and multiple as the base case
Trigger
Within 24 months
Equity risk reprices higher
A cost of equity above 11.4776% would reduce the present worth of distant earnings even if operating forecasts remain unchanged.2
FV impact
-4.9%
Cost of capital 1 point higher
Trigger
Within 12 months
Mature valuation support disappears
A terminal P/E below 31.88 times would mean investors pay less for each dollar of mature earnings, reducing long-term value.
Persistent margin weakness would mean revenue growth is not producing expected operating leverage. Lower operating profit would then reduce projected earnings and cash flow.
Alerte siBelow 31% for two consecutive fiscal years.
03
Annual diluted-share growth
Excess share issuance would divide company earnings among more shares, reducing earnings per share even if enterprise revenue grows and weakening value captured by existing holders.
Actuel :Diluted average shares rose from 2.298 billion in FY2023 to 2.565 billion in FY2025.
Alerte siAbove 8% annually for two consecutive fiscal years.
Limitation: Terminal value is 62.7% of this model's value, above the 60% level at which the methodology flags concentration; the value leans on the years beyond the explicit forecast.
Exit remaining exposure because sales are no longer producing the expected operating leverage.5
Annual diluted-share growth
Above 8% for two fiscal years
Exit remaining exposure if annual diluted-share growth exceeds 8% for two consecutive fiscal years. That breach would make business growth translate into weaker per-share earnings beyond the dilution already assumed.