Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Constellation Energy operates the premier carbon-free nuclear fleet, positioning it for data center demand. However, current market pricing aggressively discounts an AI infrastructure premium that outpaces our disciplined utility reversion models. Fair value range: low $151, high $252, with mid-point at $198.
Stock analysis

CEG fair value $151–$252

By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analysiert: 2026-05-20Nächste Aktualisierung: 2026-08-20Methodology v2.4Data cut-off: Quality gate: passSources: all material sources passed deterministic freshness/provenance gatesReview: automatedArchetype: Mature compounder
View archive
Kurs
$260.67
▼ -63.14 (-24.22%)
Fair Value
$198
$151–$252
Rating
Reduzieren
confidence 77/100
Aufwärtspotenzial
-24.2%
upside to fair value
Sicherheitsmarge
$167.90
MoS level · 15%
Marktkapitalisierung
$94.2B
P/E fwd 19.2

§1 Zusammenfassung

  • Market exuberance prices in sustained tech-infrastructure margins over traditional utility multiples.
  • Strict reversion models signal a 24.2% downside to a $197.53 fair value.
  • Composite valuation is dragged by trailing FCF deficits due to heavy investment cycles.
  • Robust accounting (Piotroski 6, Altman 2.24) secures the operational floor.
  • Extreme spread versus private calibration targets signals heavy reliance on unannounced PPAs.
Fair value
$198
Margin of safety
-32.0%
Confidence
77/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational research only - not investment advice, an offer, or a trade instruction. Confirm current data and do your own due diligence before acting.

$260.67Price
Low $151.3
Mid $197.53
High $251.59

Constellation Energy operates the premier carbon-free nuclear fleet, positioning it for data center demand. However, current market pricing aggressively discounts an AI infrastructure premium that outpaces our disciplined utility reversion models.

  • Cycle upside
    Generative AI and widespread electrification are driving unprecedented baseload capacity demand, fundamentally re-rating nuclear assets.

§2 Bärenszenario

A failure to announce high-margin multi-year data center contracts breaks the structural growth narrative. Applying historical IPP median operating margins (21.3%) and a standard utility 15x multiple craters shares toward the $151.30 low bound.

Wie diese These scheitern kann

PPA Execution Failure

· Medium

Hyperscalers balk at premium nuclear capacity pricing, forcing the company to sell uncontracted power into oversupplied wholesale merchant markets.

FV impact
Severe (reversion to $151 floor)
Trigger
12-18 months

Regulatory Support Reversal

· Low

Changes to IRA Production Tax Credits remove the structural price floor for nuclear generation, compounding margin compression during low-demand cycles.

FV impact
High
Trigger
24-36 months

Capex Escalation

· High

Uprate and maintenance capital expenditures spiral beyond the current 1.52x Capex/DA run rate, further dragging free cash flow profiles and delaying owner earnings realization.

FV impact
Moderate
Trigger
Ongoing
Frühwarnsignale zur Überwachung
KennzahlAktuellAuslöseschwelle
Operating margins falling below 20% on a trailing basis.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Failure to announce definitive data center PPAs by year-end.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Capex to depreciation ratio sustaining above 2.0x.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Hyperscaler shift toward behind-the-meter gas or geothermal.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Adverse legislative action regarding nuclear production tax credits.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Finanzielle Historie

Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung — letzte sechs Perioden

Position2021-12-312022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Umsatz$19.65B$24.44B+24.4%$24.92B+2.0%$23.57B-5.4%$25.53B+8.3%+6.8%
Bruttogewinn$2.93B$2.14B$3.23B$5.99B$4.69B+12.5%
Betriebsergebnis$362.0M$-408.0M$2.39B$4.85B$4.20B+84.5%
Nettogewinn$-205.0M$-160.0M$1.62B$3.75B+131.5%$2.32B-38.1%
EPS (verwässert)$-0.63$-0.49$5.01$11.89$7.40
EBITDA$4.44B$1.56B$4.76B$7.03B$5.96B+7.6%
F&E
VVG$0$-110.0M$-54.0M

Qualitäts-Scores

Piotroski F-Score
6 / 9
0–9 Qualitätskomposit
Altman Z-Score
2.24
Insolvenzrisiko (>3 sicher)
Beneish M-Score
-2.2
Risiko von Ergebnismanipulation
OCF / Nettogewinn
1.83×
>1 weist auf hohe Ergebnisqualität hin
Bilanzqualitätsschwelle
Pass
Sektoradjustierte Schwelle
ROIC
13.5%
Rendite auf eingesetztes Kapital
Einzelabonnenten — ab §411 weitere Abschnitte

Vollständige Analyse lesen — 11 weitere Abschnitte.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Vollständiger Bericht für jeden abgedeckten Ticker
24 Monate Rating-Archiv
Watchlist-Briefings + Rating-Änderungs-Warnungen
PDF + DOCX Export in jeder Sprache
Kostenlose Testversion starten
Jederzeit kündbar.
FAQ

CEG — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, CEG looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $261 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $198 (range $151–$252), which implies roughly 24.2% downside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of CEG also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder