Skip to content
StockMarketAgent

Quarterly cadence

Structured stock research. Bear case first.

Versioned, archetype-calibrated reports for every company currently published in our coverage universe. Each edition carries one Fair value, one Potential value, a dedicated bear case, and no issuer-paid rating product.
Read the latest letterRead the methodologyOpen data catalog

Five testable promises

  1. One fair value, with potential value labelled separately

    Every report publishes one house fair value, with potential value labelled separately, rather than presenting several competing answers. The assumptions, sensitivities, and dedicated bear case show where the conclusion can change.
  2. Bear case before bull case

    The risk section runs first, in full, with named kill scenarios and quantified downside targets. Optimistic narrative is allowed only after the thesis has been argued against on its own terms. This ordering is structural, not editorial.
  3. Archetype-aware models

    A hyper-growth software business and a deep cyclical commodity producer should not be valued the same way. Each analyzed ticker is assigned a named archetype, and that classification calibrates discount rates, terminal growth, deceleration curves, terminal multiples, and which valuation models apply.
  4. A scorecard with explicit weights

    Every report carries a quantified investment scorecard whose category weights are published, not hidden. Disagreeing with the verdict is fine; disagreeing without seeing the math is what most retail research forces you into.
  5. Quantified stress tests, every report

    The dedicated bear case puts downside evidence first, while Base and Bull scenarios show the public forecast paths. Sensitivity tables and public model cards make the Fair value conclusion testable without exposing internal calibration data.

What this is not

Not a signal service, not a copy-trading app, not a paywalled-newsletter cult of personality, not a screener with prose laid on top. The output is a reasoned investment thesis you can argue with, not a trade you are told to make.
Frequently asked

On independence

  1. How is this different from traditional research platforms or sell-side research?

    The product uses a versioned, archetype-aware methodology and publishes Fair value, Potential value, public model-card evidence, and risk analysis. The current featured research is free; subscriptions govern archive depth, saved tools, export, and developer capabilities according to the plan manifest.
  2. Is the research really independent?

  3. How accurate are the fair-value estimates?

  4. Is StockMarketAgent.AI a registered investment adviser?

Compared with

How this lens compares to the incumbents