Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Atlassian maintains an immense moat in developer and project management tooling (Jira, Confluence). However, extreme reliance on Stock-Based Compensation obscures true profitability, masking negative GAAP margins beneath robust free cash flow. Continued cloud migration and enterprise upmarket penetration drive top-line resilience, but eventual multiple expansion will strictly require GAAP margin improvement and SBC rationalization. Fair value range: low $185, high $400, with mid-point at $282.
Stock analysis

TEAM Atlassian Corporation fair value $282–$400

TEAM
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analysiert: 2026-05-09Nächste Aktualisierung: 2026-08-09Methodology v2.4Archetype: Pre-profitNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
Kurs
$91.60
▲ +189.90 (+207.31%)
Fair Value
$282
$282–$400
Rating
Starker Kauf
confidence 65/100
Aufwärtspotenzial
+207.3%
upside to fair value
Sicherheitsmarge
$239.28
buy below · 15%
Marktkapitalisierung
$23.2B
P/E fwd 14.7
Englische QuelleDE
Englische Quelle wird angezeigt, während wir übersetzen
Dieser Bericht wurde noch nicht übersetzt. Aktualisieren Sie in ein paar Minuten, sobald die Übersetzungswarteschlange aufgeholt hat.

§1 Zusammenfassung

  • Primary $281.50 target driven by immense 84% gross margin leverage and sticky enterprise moat.
  • Extreme divergence from $142 consensus stems from the market extrapolating near-term SBC dilution into perpetuity.
  • FCF remains exceptionally robust ($1.41B) but is offset nearly 1:1 by stock issuance.
  • Valuation explicitly demands GAAP operating margins reaching 22% and securing an 8x EV/Revenue multiple.
Fair value
$282
Margin of safety
+67.5%
Confidence
65/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$91.60Price
FV $281.5
High $399.57

Atlassian maintains an immense moat in developer and project management tooling (Jira, Confluence). However, extreme reliance on Stock-Based Compensation obscures true profitability, masking negative GAAP margins beneath robust free cash flow. Continued cloud migration and enterprise upmarket penetration drive top-line resilience, but eventual multiple expansion will strictly require GAAP margin improvement and SBC rationalization.

  • High switching costs in core
    High switching costs in core Jira/Confluence deployments
  • Network effects in collaborative Jira
    Network effects in collaborative Jira Service Management
  • Cycle upside
    Enterprise cloud migration phase concludes, shifting momentum to high-margin recurring renewals and AI upsells.

§2 Bärenszenario

A severe macroeconomic contraction in software developer hiring halts seat expansion entirely. Combined with investor refusal to back out ~26% SBCStock-based compensationThe fair-value cost of equity awards (options, RSUs, performance shares) granted to employees. A real economic expense even though it is non-cash., multiple compression drives valuation toward PEGPEG ratioForward P/E divided by growth rate as integer percent (e.g. 20 for 20% growth). A PEG of 1.0 is the conventional fair-value reference; below 1.0 is cheap relative to growth.-adjusted peer lows.

Wie diese These scheitern kann

Macro Seat Deceleration

· Medium

Prolonged tech hiring freezes permanently stall organic seat expansion, breaking the core growth assumption.

FV impact
Severe (-50%)
Trigger
12-24 months

Perpetual SBC Dilution

· High

Stock-based compensation remains above 25% of revenue, permanently depressing GAAP operating margins.

FV impact
Severe (-40%)
Trigger
2-3 years

AI Displacement

· Low

AI-driven developer efficiency reduces total enterprise engineering headcount needs, shrinking TEAM's TAM.

FV impact
Moderate (-20%)
Trigger
3-5 years
Frühwarnsignale zur Überwachung
KennzahlAktuellAuslöseschwelle
SBC remains > 25% of total revenueMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Cloud revenue growth structurally falls < 15%MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Enterprise customer churn spikes post-migrationMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
GAAP operating margin materially misses 22% targetMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross margin degrades below 80% baselineMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Finanzielle Historie

Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung — letzte sechs Perioden
PositionT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4CAGR
Periode2021-06-302022-06-302023-06-302024-06-302025-06-30Trend
Umsatz—$2.80B$3.53B$4.36B$5.22B+16.8%
Bruttogewinn—$2.35B$2.90B$3.56B$4.32B+16.4%
Betriebsergebnis—$70.1M$-345.2M$-117.1M$-130.4MNaN%
Nettogewinn—$-519.5M$-486.8M$-300.5M$-256.7M—
EPS (verwässert)$-2.79$-2.42$-1.90$-1.16——
EBITDA—$-377.7M$-220.1M$27.4M$24.0M—
F&E—$1.29B$1.87B$2.18B$2.67B+19.9%
VVG—$978.7M$1.37B$1.48B$1.77B+15.9%

Qualitäts-Scores

OCF / Nettogewinn
-5.69
>1 weist auf hohe Ergebnisqualität hin
Bilanzqualitätsschwelle
Fail
Sektoradjustierte Schwelle
ROIC
-0.0%
Rendite auf eingesetztes Kapital
Abschnitt 3

Numbers analysis

Einzelabonnenten — ab §411 weitere Abschnitte

Vollständige Analyse lesen — 11 weitere Abschnitte.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Vollständiger Bericht für jeden abgedeckten Ticker
24 Monate Rating-Archiv
Watchlist-Briefings + Rating-Änderungs-Warnungen
PDF + DOCX Export in jeder Sprache
Kostenlose Testversion starten
Jederzeit kündbar.
FAQ

TEAM — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, TEAM looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $91.6 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $282 (range $185–$400), which implies roughly 207.3% upside to the midpoint.

Related coverage

Names readers of TEAM also follow

Same archetype: pre-profit
Same sector: Information Technology