Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
CRWD trades against a final fair-value range of $91.54-$123.84, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $91.5, high $124, with mid-point at $108.
Stock analysis

CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. fair value $108–$124

CRWD
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analysé: 2026-05-08Prochaine mise à jour: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.4Archetype: Pre-profitNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
Cours
$468.07
▼ -360.38 (-76.99%)
Juste valeur
$108
$108–$124
Notation
Vendre
confidence 74/100
Potentiel de hausse
-77.0%
upside to fair value
Marge de sécurité
$91.54
buy below · 15%
Capitalisation boursière
$119.1B
P/E fwd 75.9
Repli en anglaisFR
Affichage de la source anglaise pendant la traduction
Ce rapport n'a pas encore été traduit. Actualisez dans quelques minutes une fois que la file d'attente de traduction aura rattrapé son retard.

§1 Résumé

  • Composite fair value $108 with high case $124.
  • Implied downside of 77.0% to fair value.
  • Moat 6.5/10 · confidence 74/100 · Pre-profit.
  • Currently screens above fair value, so patience matters more than entry speed.
Fair value
$108
Margin of safety
-334.6%
Confidence
74/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$468.07Price
FV $107.69
High $123.84

CRWD trades against a final fair-value range of $91.54-$123.84, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • High switching costs associated with
    High switching costs associated with deeply embedded endpoint agents.
  • Network effects from vast threat
    Network effects from vast threat intelligence data lake.
  • Cycle upside
    Vendor consolidation favors integrated platforms like Falcon.

§2 Cas baissier

At current multiples, the stock offers zero margin of safety. A failure to execute flawlessly on top-line growth or margin expansion will trigger a severe multiple contraction.

Comment cette thèse peut échouer

Margin Compression

· High

Fierce competition from Microsoft and PANW forces pricing compression, capping terminal margins below 20%.

FV impact
-30%

SBC Dilution

· Medium

Failure to rein in excessive stock-based compensation (22.7% of revenue) structurally impairs per-share intrinsic value.

FV impact
-20%

Growth Deceleration

· Low

Market saturation in endpoint security causes revenue growth to decelerate sharply below the 20% required by current multiples.

FV impact
-50%
Signaux d'alerte précoce à surveiller
MétriqueActuelSeuil de déclenchement
Net new ARR growth decelerates for two consecutive quarters.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross retention dips below 97%.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
SBC remains above 20% of revenue without a clear path to the 7.8% industry median.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Operating margins fail to scale towards the 30% terminal target.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Increased discounting observed in enterprise renewals.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Historique financier

Compte de résultat — six derniers exercices
PosteT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4TCAC
Période2022-01-312023-01-312024-01-312025-01-312026-01-31Trend
Chiffre d'affaires$1.45B$2.24B$3.06B$3.95B$4.81B+34.9%
Marge brute$1.07B$1.64B$2.30B$2.96B$3.59B+35.4%
Résultat d'exploitation$-142.5M$-190.1M$-2.0M$-120.4M$-293.3M
Résultat net$-234.8M$-183.2M$89.3M$-19.3M$-162.5M
BPA (dilué)$-1.03$-0.79$0.37$-0.08
EBITDA$-66.0M$-40.8M$293.8M$294.8M$182.5M
R&D$371.3M$608.4M$768.5M$1.08B$1.38B+39.0%
SG&A$839.6M$1.22B$1.53B$2.01B$2.50B+31.4%

Scores de qualité

Piotroski F-score
4 / 9
Composite qualité 0–9
Altman Z-score
11.4
Risque de faillite (>3 sûr)
Beneish M-score
-2.95
Risque de manipulation des résultats
OCF / Résultat net
-9.92
>1 indique une qualité élevée des résultats
Seuil de qualité comptable
Fail
Seuil ajusté au secteur
ROIC
34.9%
Rendement du capital investi
§3

Numbers analysis

Flux de trésorerie

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCF / net income, accounting-quality, and ROIC rows above.

Allocation du capital

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Abonnés individuels — à partir de §411 sections supplémentaires

Lire l'analyse complète — 11 sections supplémentaires.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Rapport complet pour chaque action couverte
24 mois d'archives de notations
Briefings de liste de suivi + alertes de changement de notation
Export PDF + DOCX dans n'importe quelle langue
Démarrer l'essai gratuit
Annulable à tout moment.
FAQ

CRWD — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest independent analysis, CRWD looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $468 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $108 (range $91.5–$124), which implies roughly 77.0% downside to the midpoint.