Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Micron is successfully pivoting from a highly cyclical commodity player into a critical AI infrastructure provider. The expansion into High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) provides a structural shift in both margin profile and earnings stability. Fair value range: low $557, high $865, with mid-point at $707.
Stock analysis

MU Micron Technology Inc. fair value $707–$865

MU
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analysé: 2026-05-08Prochaine mise à jour: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature compounderNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
Cours
$646.63
▲ +60.50 (+9.36%)
Juste valeur
$707
$707–$865
Notation
Conserver
confidence 88/100
Potentiel de hausse
+9.4%
upside to fair value
Marge de sécurité
$601.06
buy below · 15%
Capitalisation boursière
$729.2B
P/E fwd 6.4
Repli en anglaisFR
Affichage de la source anglaise pendant la traduction
Ce rapport n'a pas encore été traduit. Actualisez dans quelques minutes une fois que la file d'attente de traduction aura rattrapé son retard.

§1 Résumé

  • Initiating at Hold with a fair value midpoint of $707.13.
  • Transition to HBM alters margin profile and dampens historical cyclicality.
  • Heavy near-term capital intensity ($15.8B Capex) remains a significant free cash flow drag.
Fair value
$707
Margin of safety
+8.6%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$646.63Price
FV $707.13
High $864.53

Micron is successfully pivoting from a highly cyclical commodity player into a critical AI infrastructure provider. The expansion into High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) provides a structural shift in both margin profile and earnings stability.

  • HBM Advanced Packaging Integration
    HBM Advanced Packaging Integration
  • Consolidated Oligopolistic Industry Structure
    Consolidated Oligopolistic Industry Structure
  • Cycle upside
    Unprecedented AI training and inference demands require structurally higher memory density, driving a prolonged upcycle in HBM and starving traditional DRAM supply.

§2 Cas baissier

A simultaneous AI spending pause and hyperscaler inventory digestion cycle would severely impact pricing power, reverting margins to historical cyclical troughs while leaving the firm exposed to high fixed capital expenditure costs.

Comment cette thèse peut échouer

Competitor Capacity Over-Expansion

25%· Medium

SK Hynix and Samsung rapidly expand capacity, returning the HBM market to a state of brutal commodity oversupply and crushing margins.

FV impact
-30%
Trigger
12-18 months

AI Infrastructure Capex Cooling

20%· Medium

Hyperscalers pause compute cluster build-outs, leading to a severe inventory correction and plummeting memory ASPs across the board.

FV impact
-40%
Trigger
18-24 months

Geopolitical Restrictions Escalate

15%· Low

Deepening geopolitical tensions and new export restrictions severely limit remaining operations and revenue exposure in China.

FV impact
-10%
Trigger
6-12 months
Signaux d'alerte précoce à surveiller
MétriqueActuelSeuil de déclenchement
HBM3E yield degradation or failure to qualify for next-generation Nvidia architectures.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Sequential ASP declines in traditional data center and client DRAM.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Competitor capital expenditure guidance significantly exceeding forward demand forecasts.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Free cash flow turning deeply negative despite top-line revenue growth.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Hyperscaler earnings commentary indicating pushed-out AI compute cluster deployments.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Historique financier

Compte de résultat — six derniers exercices
PosteT−0T−1T−2T−3TCAC
Période2022-08-312023-08-312024-08-312025-08-31Trend
Chiffre d'affaires$30.76B$15.54B$25.11B$37.38B+6.7%
Marge brute$13.90B$-1.42B$5.61B$14.87B+2.3%
Résultat d'exploitation$9.71B$-5.41B$1.31B$9.81B+0.3%
Résultat net$8.69B$-5.83B$778.0M$8.54B-0.6%
BPA (dilué)$7.75$-5.34$0.70$7.59-0.7%
EBITDA$16.88B$2.49B$9.58B$18.48B+3.1%
R&D$3.12B$3.11B$3.43B$3.80B+6.8%
SG&A$1.07B$920.0M$1.13B$1.21B+4.2%

Scores de qualité

Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Composite qualité 0–9
Altman Z-score
17.21
Risque de faillite (>3 sûr)
Beneish M-score
-2.73
Risque de manipulation des résultats
OCF / Résultat net
2.05×
>1 indique une qualité élevée des résultats
Seuil de qualité comptable
Pass
Seuil ajusté au secteur
ROIC
6.7%
Rendement du capital investi
§3

Numbers analysis

Flux de trésorerie

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCF / net income, accounting-quality, and ROIC rows above.

Allocation du capital

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Abonnés individuels — à partir de §411 sections supplémentaires

Lire l'analyse complète — 11 sections supplémentaires.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Rapport complet pour chaque action couverte
24 mois d'archives de notations
Briefings de liste de suivi + alertes de changement de notation
Export PDF + DOCX dans n'importe quelle langue
Démarrer l'essai gratuit
Annulable à tout moment.
FAQ

MU — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest independent analysis, MU looks modestly undervalued. The current price is $647 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $707 (range $557–$865), which implies roughly 9.4% upside to the midpoint.