Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Atlassian maintains an immense moat in developer and project management tooling (Jira, Confluence). However, extreme reliance on Stock-Based Compensation obscures true profitability, masking negative GAAP margins beneath robust free cash flow. Continued cloud migration and enterprise upmarket penetration drive top-line resilience, but eventual multiple expansion will strictly require GAAP margin improvement and SBC rationalization. Fair value range: low $185, high $400, with mid-point at $282.
Stock analysis

TEAM Atlassian Corporation fair value $282–$400

TEAM
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analysé: 2026-05-09Prochaine mise à jour: 2026-08-09Methodology v2.4Archetype: Pre-profitNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
Cours
$91.60
▲ +189.90 (+207.31%)
Juste valeur
$282
$282–$400
Notation
Achat fort
confidence 65/100
Potentiel de hausse
+207.3%
upside to fair value
Marge de sécurité
$239.28
buy below · 15%
Capitalisation boursière
$23.2B
P/E fwd 14.7
Repli en anglaisFR
Affichage de la source anglaise pendant la traduction
Ce rapport n'a pas encore été traduit. Actualisez dans quelques minutes une fois que la file d'attente de traduction aura rattrapé son retard.

§1 Résumé

  • Primary $281.50 target driven by immense 84% gross margin leverage and sticky enterprise moat.
  • Extreme divergence from $142 consensus stems from the market extrapolating near-term SBC dilution into perpetuity.
  • FCF remains exceptionally robust ($1.41B) but is offset nearly 1:1 by stock issuance.
  • Valuation explicitly demands GAAP operating margins reaching 22% and securing an 8x EV/Revenue multiple.
Fair value
$282
Margin of safety
+67.5%
Confidence
65/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$91.60Price
FV $281.5
High $399.57

Atlassian maintains an immense moat in developer and project management tooling (Jira, Confluence). However, extreme reliance on Stock-Based Compensation obscures true profitability, masking negative GAAP margins beneath robust free cash flow. Continued cloud migration and enterprise upmarket penetration drive top-line resilience, but eventual multiple expansion will strictly require GAAP margin improvement and SBC rationalization.

  • High switching costs in core
    High switching costs in core Jira/Confluence deployments
  • Network effects in collaborative Jira
    Network effects in collaborative Jira Service Management
  • Cycle upside
    Enterprise cloud migration phase concludes, shifting momentum to high-margin recurring renewals and AI upsells.

§2 Cas baissier

A severe macroeconomic contraction in software developer hiring halts seat expansion entirely. Combined with investor refusal to back out ~26% SBCStock-based compensationThe fair-value cost of equity awards (options, RSUs, performance shares) granted to employees. A real economic expense even though it is non-cash., multiple compression drives valuation toward PEGPEG ratioForward P/E divided by growth rate as integer percent (e.g. 20 for 20% growth). A PEG of 1.0 is the conventional fair-value reference; below 1.0 is cheap relative to growth.-adjusted peer lows.

Comment cette thèse peut échouer

Macro Seat Deceleration

· Medium

Prolonged tech hiring freezes permanently stall organic seat expansion, breaking the core growth assumption.

FV impact
Severe (-50%)
Trigger
12-24 months

Perpetual SBC Dilution

· High

Stock-based compensation remains above 25% of revenue, permanently depressing GAAP operating margins.

FV impact
Severe (-40%)
Trigger
2-3 years

AI Displacement

· Low

AI-driven developer efficiency reduces total enterprise engineering headcount needs, shrinking TEAM's TAM.

FV impact
Moderate (-20%)
Trigger
3-5 years
Signaux d'alerte précoce à surveiller
MétriqueActuelSeuil de déclenchement
SBC remains > 25% of total revenueMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Cloud revenue growth structurally falls < 15%MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Enterprise customer churn spikes post-migrationMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
GAAP operating margin materially misses 22% targetMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross margin degrades below 80% baselineMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Historique financier

Compte de résultat — six derniers exercices
PosteT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4TCAC
Période2021-06-302022-06-302023-06-302024-06-302025-06-30Trend
Chiffre d'affaires—$2.80B$3.53B$4.36B$5.22B+16.8%
Marge brute—$2.35B$2.90B$3.56B$4.32B+16.4%
Résultat d'exploitation—$70.1M$-345.2M$-117.1M$-130.4MNaN%
Résultat net—$-519.5M$-486.8M$-300.5M$-256.7M—
BPA (dilué)$-2.79$-2.42$-1.90$-1.16——
EBITDA—$-377.7M$-220.1M$27.4M$24.0M—
R&D—$1.29B$1.87B$2.18B$2.67B+19.9%
SG&A—$978.7M$1.37B$1.48B$1.77B+15.9%

Scores de qualité

OCF / Résultat net
-5.69
>1 indique une qualité élevée des résultats
Seuil de qualité comptable
Fail
Seuil ajusté au secteur
ROIC
-0.0%
Rendement du capital investi
§3

Numbers analysis

Allocation du capital

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Abonnés individuels — à partir de §411 sections supplémentaires

Lire l'analyse complète — 11 sections supplémentaires.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Rapport complet pour chaque action couverte
24 mois d'archives de notations
Briefings de liste de suivi + alertes de changement de notation
Export PDF + DOCX dans n'importe quelle langue
Démarrer l'essai gratuit
Annulable à tout moment.
FAQ

TEAM — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, TEAM looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $91.6 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $282 (range $185–$400), which implies roughly 207.3% upside to the midpoint.

Related coverage

Names readers of TEAM also follow

Same archetype: pre-profit
Same sector: Information Technology