Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
META trades against a final fair-value range of $585.59-$1,006.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $586, high $1006, with mid-point at $797.
Stock analysis

META fair value $586–$1,006

By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analizzato: 2026-05-08Prossimo aggiornamento: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.5Review: automatedArchetype: Growth infrastructure
View archive
Prezzo
$616.81
▲ +179.76 (+29.14%)
Valore equo
$797
$586–$1006
Valutazione
Acquisto forte
confidence 88/100
Potenziale rialzo
+29.1%
upside to fair value
Margine di Sicurezza
$677.08
MoS level · 15%
Capitalizzazione
$1.57T
P/E fwd 17.0
Fallback in ingleseIT
Mostrando la fonte in inglese mentre traduciamo
Questo report non è ancora stato tradotto. Aggiorna tra qualche minuto una volta che la coda di traduzione avrà recuperato.

§1 Sintesi

  • Composite fair value $797 with high case $1,006.
  • Implied upside of 29.1% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 88/100 · Growth infrastructure.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$797
Margin of safety
+22.6%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational research only - not investment advice, an offer, or a trade instruction. Confirm current data and do your own due diligence before acting.

$616.81Price
Low $585.59
Mid $796.57
High $1,006.45

META trades against a final fair-value range of $585.59-$1,006.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • Network effects across billions of
    Network effects across billions of daily active users.
  • Unmatched user data enabling superior
    Unmatched user data enabling superior ad targeting.
  • Bull thesis
    The $796 composite successfully isolates the core ad moat from the near-term capex distortion.

§2 Scenario ribassista

A sudden macro advertising recession colliding with peak AI infrastructure commitments forces free cash flowFree cash flowOperating cash flow minus capital expenditures. The cash a business generates after maintaining and growing its asset base — the closest accounting proxy for owner-economics. generation into severe contraction, threatening capital return policies.

Come questa tesi può fallire

AI Capex Failure

Low-Medium· Low

Massive AI infrastructure capex fails to generate commensurate revenue returns, permanently depressing ROIC.

FV impact
Reduces fair value to $585.59 (Bear Case).

TikTok Engagement Erosion

· Medium

Intensifying competition from short-form video erodes core Family of Apps engagement and ad pricing.

FV impact
-20% to base fair value.

Reality Labs Perpetual Sink

Medium-High· Low

Reality Labs fails to reach commercial viability, acting as a permanent and expanding multi-billion dollar capital sink.

FV impact
-15% to base fair value.
Segnali di allerta precoce da monitorare
MetricaAttualeSoglia di attivazione
Capex-to-revenue structurally exceeding 35% without ad yield expansion.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Consecutive quarters of declining daily active users.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Reality Labs operating losses accelerating past $25B annually.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Deteriorating return on ad spend (ROAS) for advertisers.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Failure to maintain leadership in open-source AI foundations.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Storia finanziaria

Conto economico — ultimi sei periodi

Voce2021-12-312022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Ricavi$116.61B$134.90B+15.7%$164.50B+21.9%$200.97B+22.2%+14.6%
Utile lordo$91.36B$108.94B$134.34B$164.79B+15.9%
Reddito operativo$28.94B$46.75B$69.38B$83.28B+30.2%
Utile netto$23.20B$39.10B+68.5%$62.36B+59.5%$60.46B-3.0%+27.1%
EPS (diluito)$13.77$8.59$14.87$23.86+14.7%
EBITDA$37.69B$59.05B$86.88B$105.71B+29.4%
R&S$35.34B$38.48B$43.87B$57.37B+12.9%
SG&A$27.08B$23.71B$21.09B$24.14B-2.8%

Punteggi di qualità

Piotroski F-score
5 / 9
Composito qualità 0–9
Altman Z-score
8.96
Rischio di fallimento (>3 sicuro)
Beneish M-score
-3.01
Rischio di manipolazione degli utili
OCF / Utile netto
1.92×
>1 indica alta qualità degli utili
Soglia di qualità contabile
Pass
Soglia corretta per settore
ROIC
19.9%
Rendimento del capitale investito
Abbonati individuali — da §4 in poi11 sezioni in più

Leggi l'analisi completa — 11 sezioni in più.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Report completo per ogni ticker coperto
24 mesi di archivio rating
Briefing della watchlist + avvisi di variazione del rating
Esportazione PDF + DOCX in qualsiasi lingua
Inizia la prova gratuita
Annulla in qualsiasi momento.
INCOME STATEMENT FAQ

META income statement questions

  1. Our financial-history view of META (META) covers revenue, gross profit, operating income, and net income across the past five fiscal years, with year-over-year growth and margin context for each line.
FAQ

META — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, META looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $617 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $797 (range $586–$1006), which implies roughly 29.1% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of META also follow

Same archetype: growth-infra