Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
UBER trades against a final fair-value range of $79.84-$160.48, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $79.8, high $160, with mid-point at $120.
Stock analysis

UBER fair value $80–$160

By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
분석일: 2026-05-09다음 업데이트: 2026-08-09Methodology v2.5Review: automatedArchetype: Mature compounder
View archive
주가
$75.45
▲ +44.29 (+58.70%)
공정 가치
$120
$80–$160
등급
적극 매수
confidence 88/100
상승 여력
+58.7%
upside to fair value
안전 마진
$101.78
MoS level · 15%
시가총액
$153.6B
P/E fwd 17.4
영어 원본으로 대체KO
번역하는 동안 영어 원본을 표시 중
이 리포트는 아직 번역되지 않았습니다. 번역 대기열이 따라잡으면 몇 분 후에 새로고침하세요.

§1 개요

  • Composite fair value $120 with high case $160.
  • Implied upside of 58.7% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 88/100 · Mature compounder.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$120
Margin of safety
+37.0%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational research only - not investment advice, an offer, or a trade instruction. Confirm current data and do your own due diligence before acting.

$75.45Price
Low $79.84
Mid $119.74
High $160.48

UBER trades against a final fair-value range of $79.84-$160.48, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • Massive two-sided network liquidity
    Massive two-sided network liquidity
  • Global scale advantages
    Global scale advantages
  • Cycle upside
    Increasing urban density and shift away from personal car ownership drive structural tailwinds.

§2 베어 케이스

A severe macroeconomic contraction coincides with adverse regulatory rulings reclassifying drivers as employees in key jurisdictions, destroying unit economics and forcing aggressive price hikes that crush demand elasticity.

이 논제가 무너지는 경로

Global Driver Reclassification

· Medium

Major markets mandate employee status for drivers, destroying the variable cost structure and forcing fixed-cost absorption.

FV impact
Severe downside to $60
Trigger
12-24 Months

Autonomous Vehicle Disintermediation

· Low

Well-funded competitors scale proprietary autonomous fleets faster than Uber can integrate them, bypassing the driver network moat.

FV impact
Catastrophic downside to $40
Trigger
36-60 Months

Delivery Take-Rate Collapse

· Medium

Regulatory price caps on restaurant commissions become permanent and widespread, eliminating the profitability of the Delivery segment.

FV impact
Moderate downside to $80
Trigger
12-36 Months
모니터링할 조기 경보 신호
지표현재트리거 임계값
Gross bookings growth decelerates below 10% YoY for two consecutive quarters.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
EBITDA margins compress as incentive spend spikes to retain driver supply.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Uber One subscriber growth stalls or churn increases materially.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Take rates decline sequentially in either Mobility or Delivery segments.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Advertising revenue growth fails to outpace underlying delivery volumes.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 재무 이력

손익계산서 — 최근 6기
항목T−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
기간2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
매출$31.88B$37.28B$43.98B$52.02B+17.7%
매출총이익$12.22B$14.82B$17.33B$20.68B+19.2%
영업이익$-1.83B$1.11B$2.80B$5.57B
순이익$-9.14B$1.89B$9.86B$10.05B
EPS (희석)$-4.65$0.87$4.56$4.73
EBITDA$-7.91B$3.78B$5.39B$6.99B
R&D$2.80B$3.16B$3.11B$3.40B+6.7%
판관비$7.89B$7.04B$7.98B$8.14B+1.0%

품질 점수

Piotroski F-스코어
6 / 9
0–9 품질 종합
Altman Z-스코어
3.7
파산 위험 (>3 안전)
Beneish M-스코어
-2.3
이익 조작 위험
OCF / 순이익
1.01×
>1은 이익의 질이 높음을 의미
회계 품질 게이트
Pass
섹터 조정 게이트
ROIC
12.6%
투하자본수익률
섹션 3

Numbers analysis

현금 흐름

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCFOperating cash flowCash generated from the company's core operations after working-capital changes but before capital expenditures. The first line of the cash-flow statement. / net incomeNet IncomeNet Income is an income-statement line item used to reconcile revenue to operating profit, pre-tax income, net income, or per-share earnings. It should be compared across periods and against peer disclosure conventions., accounting-quality, and ROICROICReturn on invested capital. Operating profit (after tax) divided by invested capital. The single best gauge of capital-efficiency. Spread over WACC = economic value created. rows above.

자본 배분

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

개인 구독자 — §4부터11개 섹션 더

전체 분석 읽기 — 11개 섹션 더.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

모든 커버 종목에 대한 전체 보고서
24개월 등급 아카이브
관심 목록 브리핑 + 등급 변경 알림
모든 언어로 PDF + DOCX 내보내기
무료 체험 시작
언제든지 취소 가능.
SCENARIOS FAQ

UBER scenarios questions

  1. Each scenario for UBER (UBER) carries a five-year price target, an explicit set of assumptions (growth, terminal multiple, margin path), and a probability weight calibrated against current visibility.
FAQ

UBER — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, UBER looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $75.5 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $120 (range $79.8–$160), which implies roughly 58.7% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of UBER also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder