Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
META trades against a final fair-value range of $585.59-$1,006.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $586, high $1006, with mid-point at $797.
Stock analysis

META fair value $586–$1,006

By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Przeanalizowano: 2026-05-08Następna aktualizacja: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.5Review: automatedArchetype: Growth infrastructure
View archive
Cena
$616.81
▲ +179.76 (+29.14%)
Wartość godziwa
$797
$586–$1006
Rekomendacja
Zdecydowanie kupuj
confidence 88/100
Potencjał wzrostu
+29.1%
upside to fair value
Margines Bezpieczeństwa
$677.08
MoS level · 15%
Kapitalizacja
$1.57T
P/E fwd 17.0
Awaryjny angielskiPL
Pokazujemy źródło angielskie podczas tłumaczenia
Ten raport nie został jeszcze przetłumaczony. Odśwież za kilka minut, gdy kolejka tłumaczeń go przetworzy.

§1 Podsumowanie wykonawcze

  • Composite fair value $797 with high case $1,006.
  • Implied upside of 29.1% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 88/100 · Growth infrastructure.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$797
Margin of safety
+22.6%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational research only - not investment advice, an offer, or a trade instruction. Confirm current data and do your own due diligence before acting.

$616.81Price
Low $585.59
Mid $796.57
High $1,006.45

META trades against a final fair-value range of $585.59-$1,006.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • Network effects across billions of
    Network effects across billions of daily active users.
  • Unmatched user data enabling superior
    Unmatched user data enabling superior ad targeting.
  • Bull thesis
    The $796 composite successfully isolates the core ad moat from the near-term capex distortion.

§2 Scenariusz negatywny

A sudden macro advertising recession colliding with peak AI infrastructure commitments forces free cash flowFree cash flowOperating cash flow minus capital expenditures. The cash a business generates after maintaining and growing its asset base — the closest accounting proxy for owner-economics. generation into severe contraction, threatening capital return policies.

Jak ta teza może się załamać

AI Capex Failure

Low-Medium· Low

Massive AI infrastructure capex fails to generate commensurate revenue returns, permanently depressing ROIC.

FV impact
Reduces fair value to $585.59 (Bear Case).

TikTok Engagement Erosion

· Medium

Intensifying competition from short-form video erodes core Family of Apps engagement and ad pricing.

FV impact
-20% to base fair value.

Reality Labs Perpetual Sink

Medium-High· Low

Reality Labs fails to reach commercial viability, acting as a permanent and expanding multi-billion dollar capital sink.

FV impact
-15% to base fair value.
Sygnały wczesnego ostrzegania do monitorowania
WskaźnikBieżącyPróg wyzwalania
Capex-to-revenue structurally exceeding 35% without ad yield expansion.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Consecutive quarters of declining daily active users.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Reality Labs operating losses accelerating past $25B annually.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Deteriorating return on ad spend (ROAS) for advertisers.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Failure to maintain leadership in open-source AI foundations.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Historia finansowa

Rachunek zysków i strat — ostatnich sześć okresów

Pozycja2021-12-312022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Przychody$116.61B$134.90B+15.7%$164.50B+21.9%$200.97B+22.2%+14.6%
Zysk brutto$91.36B$108.94B$134.34B$164.79B+15.9%
Zysk operacyjny$28.94B$46.75B$69.38B$83.28B+30.2%
Zysk netto$23.20B$39.10B+68.5%$62.36B+59.5%$60.46B-3.0%+27.1%
EPS (rozwodniony)$13.77$8.59$14.87$23.86+14.7%
EBITDA$37.69B$59.05B$86.88B$105.71B+29.4%
R&D$35.34B$38.48B$43.87B$57.37B+12.9%
SG&A$27.08B$23.71B$21.09B$24.14B-2.8%

Wyniki jakości

Wskaźnik Piotroski F
5 / 9
Złożony wynik jakości 0–9
Wskaźnik Altman Z
8.96
Ryzyko upadłości (>3 bezpieczne)
Wskaźnik Beneish M
-3.01
Ryzyko manipulacji wynikami
OCF / Zysk netto
1.92×
>1 wskazuje wysoką jakość wyników
Bramka jakości księgowej
Pass
Bramka skorygowana o sektor
ROIC
19.9%
Zwrot z zainwestowanego kapitału
Subskrybenci indywidualni — od §411 kolejnych sekcji

Przeczytaj pełną analizę — 11 kolejnych sekcji.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Pełny raport dla każdego pokrytego tickera
24 miesiące archiwum rekomendacji
Briefingi watchlisty + alerty zmian rekomendacji
Eksport PDF + DOCX w dowolnym języku
Rozpocznij darmowy okres próbny
Anuluj w dowolnym momencie.
SCENARIOS FAQ

META scenarios questions

  1. Each scenario for META (META) carries a five-year price target, an explicit set of assumptions (growth, terminal multiple, margin path), and a probability weight calibrated against current visibility.
FAQ

META — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, META looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $617 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $797 (range $586–$1006), which implies roughly 29.1% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of META also follow

Same archetype: growth-infra