Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Atlassian maintains an immense moat in developer and project management tooling (Jira, Confluence). However, extreme reliance on Stock-Based Compensation obscures true profitability, masking negative GAAP margins beneath robust free cash flow. Continued cloud migration and enterprise upmarket penetration drive top-line resilience, but eventual multiple expansion will strictly require GAAP margin improvement and SBC rationalization. Fair value range: low $185, high $400, with mid-point at $282.
Stock analysis

TEAM fair value $185–$400

By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
已分析: 2026-05-09下次更新: 2026-08-09Methodology v2.5Review: automatedArchetype: Pre-profit
View archive
股价
$91.60
▲ +189.90 (+207.31%)
公允价值
$282
$185–$400
评级
强力买入
confidence 65/100
上行空间
+207.3%
upside to fair value
安全边际
$239.28
MoS level · 15%
市值
$23.2B
P/E fwd 14.7
英文原文ZH
翻译期间显示英文原文
此报告尚未翻译。翻译队列赶上后请在几分钟内刷新。

§1 执行摘要

  • Primary $281.50 target driven by immense 84% gross margin leverage and sticky enterprise moat.
  • Extreme divergence from $142 internal valuation cross-checks stems from the market extrapolating near-term SBC dilution into perpetuity.
  • FCF remains exceptionally robust ($1.41B) but is offset nearly 1:1 by stock issuance.
  • Valuation explicitly demands GAAP operating margins reaching 22% and securing an 8x EV/Revenue multiple.
Fair value
$282
Margin of safety
+67.5%
Confidence
65/100
Moat
9/10

Educational research only - not investment advice, an offer, or a trade instruction. Confirm current data and do your own due diligence before acting.

$91.60Price
Low $185.46
Mid $281.5
High $399.57

Atlassian maintains an immense moat in developer and project management tooling (Jira, Confluence). However, extreme reliance on Stock-Based Compensation obscures true profitability, masking negative GAAP margins beneath robust free cash flow. Continued cloud migration and enterprise upmarket penetration drive top-line resilience, but eventual multiple expansion will strictly require GAAP margin improvement and SBC rationalization.

  • High switching costs in core
    High switching costs in core Jira/Confluence deployments
  • Network effects in collaborative Jira
    Network effects in collaborative Jira Service Management
  • Cycle upside
    Enterprise cloud migration phase concludes, shifting momentum to high-margin recurring renewals and AI upsells.

§2 看空情景

A severe macroeconomic contraction in software developer hiring halts seat expansion entirely. Combined with investor refusal to back out ~26% SBCStock-based compensationThe fair-value cost of equity awards (options, RSUs, performance shares) granted to employees. A real economic expense even though it is non-cash., multiple compression drives valuation toward PEGPEG ratioForward P/E divided by growth rate as integer percent (e.g. 20 for 20% growth). A PEG of 1.0 is the conventional fair-value reference; below 1.0 is cheap relative to growth.-adjusted peer lows.

该论点可能失败的方式

Macro Seat Deceleration

· Medium

Prolonged tech hiring freezes permanently stall organic seat expansion, breaking the core growth assumption.

FV impact
Severe (-50%)
Trigger
12-24 months

Perpetual SBC Dilution

· High

Stock-based compensation remains above 25% of revenue, permanently depressing GAAP operating margins.

FV impact
Severe (-40%)
Trigger
2-3 years

AI Displacement

· Low

AI-driven developer efficiency reduces total enterprise engineering headcount needs, shrinking TEAM's TAM.

FV impact
Moderate (-20%)
Trigger
3-5 years
需关注的早期预警信号
指标当前触发阈值
SBC remains > 25% of total revenueMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Cloud revenue growth structurally falls < 15%MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Enterprise customer churn spikes post-migrationMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
GAAP operating margin materially misses 22% targetMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross margin degrades below 80% baselineMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 财务历史

损益表 — 最近六期

项目2021-06-302022-06-302023-06-302024-06-302025-06-30Trend
营业收入$2.80B$3.53B+26.1%$4.36B+23.5%$5.22B+19.7%+16.8%
毛利$2.35B$2.90B$3.56B$4.32B+16.4%
营业利润$70.1M$-345.2M$-117.1M$-130.4MNaN%
净利润$-519.5M$-486.8M$-300.5M$-256.7M
每股收益(摊薄)$-2.79$-2.42$-1.90$-1.16
EBITDA$-377.7M$-220.1M$27.4M$24.0M
研发$1.29B$1.87B$2.18B$2.67B+19.9%
销售管理费用$978.7M$1.37B$1.48B$1.77B+15.9%

质量评分

OCF / 净利润
-5.69
>1 表示盈利质量高
会计质量门槛
Fail
经行业调整门槛
ROIC
-0.0%
投入资本回报率
个人订阅用户 — §4 及之后还有 11 个章节

阅读完整分析 — 还有 11 个章节。

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

涵盖每个股票的完整报告
24 个月的评级存档
关注列表简报 + 评级变更提醒
以任意语言导出 PDF + DOCX
开始免费试用
可随时取消。
CASH FLOW FAQ

TEAM cash flow questions

  1. Free cash flow for TEAM (TEAM) is computed as operating cash flow minus capital expenditure. We report both the absolute level and the FCF margin against revenue, with five years of trajectory.
FAQ

TEAM — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, TEAM looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $91.6 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $282 (range $185–$400), which implies roughly 207.3% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of TEAM also follow

Same archetype: pre-profit