Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Gilead Sciences is a highly cash-generative, mature biopharma business anchored by its dominant HIV franchise. While top-line growth is constrained by patent maturities and competition, immense free cash flow generation easily supports a robust dividend and strategic oncology acquisitions. Fair value range: low $103, high $163, with mid-point at $132.
Stock analysis

GILD Gilead Sciences Inc. fair value $132–$163

GILD
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analyzed: 2026-05-08Next update: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature dividendNASDAQ · Health Care
View archive
Last price
$134.06
▼ -1.59 (-1.19%)
Fair value
$132
$132–$163
Rating
Hold
confidence 88/100
Upside
-1.2%
upside to fair value
Margin of Safety
$112.60
buy below · 15%
Market Cap
$166.4B
P/E fwd 13.9

§1 Executive summary

  • Fairly valued with a synthesized target of $132.47 compared to a current price of $134.06.
  • Dominant but mature HIV franchise faces long-term growth constraints and patent expirations.
  • Immense free cash flow easily supports a robust dividend and ongoing strategic oncology investments.
  • Near-term multiple expansion requires significant commercial breakthroughs in the oncology pipeline.
Fair value
$132
Margin of safety
-1.2%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$134.06Price
FV $132.47
High $163

Gilead Sciences is a highly cash-generative, mature biopharma business anchored by its dominant HIV franchise. While top-line growth is constrained by patent maturities and competition, immense free cash flow generation easily supports a robust dividend and strategic oncology acquisitions.

  • Intangible Assets (Patents)
    Intangible Assets (Patents)
  • Scale
    Scale
  • Cycle upside
    Accelerated approval of novel oncology therapies.

§2 Bear case

A stress test scenario combining significant margin compression and revenue stagnation yields a fair value floor around $92-$102, anchored by sustainable dividend yields but penalizing the lack of top-line growth.

Ways this thesis can break

Biktarvy LOE Collapse

· High

Rapid market share loss following the loss of exclusivity for Biktarvy without adequate replacement from the oncology pipeline.

FV impact
Down to ~$102
Trigger
Medium-Term

Oncology Pipeline Failure

· Medium

Late-stage clinical trial failures for key oncology assets fail to offset the impending revenue decay in virology.

FV impact
Down to ~$108
Trigger
Near-Term

Aggressive Pricing Reform

· Medium

Severe regulatory pricing pressures in the core HIV portfolio significantly compress operating margins.

FV impact
Down to ~$115
Trigger
Near-Term
Early-warning signals to monitor
MetricCurrentTrigger threshold
Decelerating revenue growth in the core HIV franchise.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Clinical trial setbacks in the oncology pipeline.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Contraction of operating margins below historical averages.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Increased competitive intensity in the long-acting HIV market.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Failure to efficiently deploy free cash flow into accretive acquisitions.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Financial history

Income statement — last six periods
Line itemT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4CAGR
Period2021-12-312022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Revenue$27.31B$27.28B$27.12B$28.75B$29.44B+1.9%
Gross profit$20.70B$21.62B$20.62B$22.50B$23.21B+2.9%
Operating income$10.86B$10.97B$8.84B$10.60B$11.70B+1.9%
Net income$6.23B$4.59B$5.67B$480.0M$8.51B+8.1%
EPS (diluted)$4.93$3.64$4.50$0.38$6.78+8.3%
EBITDA$11.33B$8.85B$10.50B$4.43B$13.58B+4.6%
R&D$4.60B$4.98B$5.72B$5.91B$5.80B+6.0%
SG&A$5.25B$5.67B$6.06B$6.00B$5.71B+2.1%

Quality scores

Piotroski F-score
8 / 9
0–9 quality composite
Altman Z-score
4.3
Bankruptcy risk (>3 safe)
Beneish M-score
-2.45
Earnings manipulation risk
OCF / Net income
1.18×
>1 indicates high earnings quality
Accounting quality gate
Pass
Sector-adjusted gate
ROIC
2.9%
Return on invested capital
§3

Numbers analysis

Cash flow

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCF / net income, accounting-quality, and ROIC rows above.

Capital allocation

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Individual subscribers — §4 onwards11 more sections

Read the full analysis — 11 more sections.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Full report for every covered ticker
24 months of rating archive
Watchlist briefings + rating-change alerts
PDF + DOCX export in any language
Start free trial
Cancel anytime.
FAQ

GILD — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest independent analysis, GILD trades close to fair value. The current price is $134 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $132 (range $103–$163), which implies roughly 1.2% downside to the midpoint.