Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
Illumina remains the dominant player in genomic sequencing but is transitioning into a mature compounder phase. Having resolved recent antitrust distractions and returned to profitability in 2025, the company faces normalized mid-single-digit growth, requiring disciplined capital allocation and margin protection against emerging competitors. Fair value range: low $74.5, high $122, with mid-point at $98.4.
Stock analysis

ILMN ILMN fair value $75–$122

ILMN
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analyzed: 2026-05-13Next update: 2026-08-13Methodology v2.4Review: automatedArchetype: Mature compounder
View archive
Last price
$145.70
▼ -47.31 (-32.47%)
Fair value
$98
$75–$122
Rating
Sell
confidence 74/100
Upside
-32.5%
upside to fair value
Margin of Safety
$83.63
MoS level · 15%
Market Cap
$22.0B
P/E fwd 24.6

§1 Executive summary

  • Current price ($145.70) embeds an unrealistic 10.77% implied growth rate versus grounded 4.85% projections.
  • Valuation models anchor on mid-single-digit mature compounding, yielding a $98.39 fair value midpoint.
  • Severe overvaluation relative to peers (PEG 4.93 vs 1.58 median) restricts any multiple expansion.
  • Primary models (Multi-stage Moat Fade and Discounted Earnings) highlight moat fade and capped pricing power.
  • Rating is Sell due to the massive 32% downside risk against conservative 4-5% revenue growth estimates.
Fair value
$98
Margin of safety
-48.1%
Confidence
74/100
Moat
6/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$145.70Price
Low $74.53
Mid $98.39
High $122.41

Illumina remains the dominant player in genomic sequencing but is transitioning into a mature compounder phase. Having resolved recent antitrust distractions and returned to profitability in 2025, the company faces normalized mid-single-digit growth, requiring disciplined capital allocation and margin protection against emerging competitors.

  • Dominant installed base in short-read
    Dominant installed base in short-read sequencing.
  • High switching costs for integrated
    High switching costs for integrated clinical diagnostics workflows.
  • Cycle upside
    Accelerating elasticity of demand in sequencing and successful expansion into high-margin clinical diagnostics.

§2 Bear case

Intense competition from emerging short-read and long-read sequencing players erodes market share, forcing permanent price reductions that chronically compress operating margins and revenue growthRevenue growthYear-over-year change in revenue, expressed as a percentage. The starting point for any forward-earnings model and the lens through which scale, mix, and pricing power become visible. below the 4% floor.

Ways this thesis can break

Severe Moat Fade & Pricing War

30%· Medium

Emerging competitors force steep price cuts, compressing operating margins below 15% and permanently stalling revenue growth.

FV impact
Down to $74.53 (Low scenario anchor)
Trigger
12-24 months

Elasticity Failure on NovaSeq X

25%· Medium

Lower sequencing costs fail to spur sufficient demand volume to mathematically offset the price per gigabase reduction.

FV impact
Compression toward $79.26 (Discounted Earnings anchor)
Trigger
12-18 months

Capital Allocation Missteps

20%· Medium

Management pursues destructive M&A or fails to manage restructuring maintenance capex, crushing free cash flow conversion.

FV impact
Collapse toward $46.70 (PEG Adjusted Peer level)
Trigger
24-36 months
Early-warning signals to monitor
MetricCurrentTrigger threshold
Operating margin failing to sustain above the critical 15% threshold.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Forward P/E contraction steadily sliding toward the peer median of 18.28x.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Revenue growth consistently printing below 4% on a year-over-year basis.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
NovaSeq X consumable pull-through falling short of historical upgrade cycles.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
R&D step-ups required to defend market share severely compressing free cash flow.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Financial history

Income statement — last six periods
Line itemT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4CAGR
Period2021-12-312022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Revenue$4.58B$4.50B$4.37B$4.34B-1.3%
Gross profit$2.97B$2.74B$2.86B$2.87B-0.9%
Operating income$354.0M$-222.0M$600.0M$817.0M+23.3%
Net income$-4.40B$-1.16B$-1.22B$850.0M
EPS (diluted)$5.04$-28.00$-7.34$-7.69$5.45+2.0%
EBITDA$-3.92B$-608.0M$-725.0M$1.46B
R&D$1.32B$1.35B$1.17B$967.0M-7.5%
SG&A$1.30B$1.61B$1.09B$1.09B-4.3%

Quality scores

OCF / Net income
1.27×
>1 indicates high earnings quality
Accounting quality gate
Fail
Sector-adjusted gate
ROIC
17.8%
Return on invested capital
§3

Numbers analysis

Individual subscribers — §4 onwards11 more sections

Read the full analysis — 11 more sections.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Full report for every covered ticker
24 months of rating archive
Watchlist briefings + rating-change alerts
PDF + DOCX export in any language
Start free trial
Cancel anytime.
FAQ

ILMN — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, ILMN looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $146 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $98.4 (range $74.5–$122), which implies roughly 32.5% downside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of ILMN also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder