Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
META trades against a final fair-value range of $585.59-$1,006.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $586, high $1006, with mid-point at $797.
Stock analysis

META Meta Platforms Inc. fair value $797–$1,006

META
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analyzed: 2026-05-08Next update: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.4Archetype: Growth infrastructureNASDAQ · Communication Services
View archive
Last price
$616.81
▲ +179.76 (+29.14%)
Fair value
$797
$797–$1006
Rating
Strong Buy
confidence 88/100
Upside
+29.1%
upside to fair value
Margin of Safety
$677.08
buy below · 15%
Market Cap
$1.57T
P/E fwd 17.0

§1 Executive summary

  • Composite fair value $797 with high case $1,006.
  • Implied upside of 29.1% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 88/100 · Growth infrastructure.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$797
Margin of safety
+22.6%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$616.81Price
FV $796.57
High $1,006.45

META trades against a final fair-value range of $585.59-$1,006.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • Network effects across billions of
    Network effects across billions of daily active users.
  • Unmatched user data enabling superior
    Unmatched user data enabling superior ad targeting.
  • Bull thesis
    The $796 composite successfully isolates the core ad moat from the near-term capex distortion.

§2 Bear case

A sudden macro advertising recession colliding with peak AI infrastructure commitments forces free cash flow generation into severe contraction, threatening capital return policies.

Ways this thesis can break

AI Capex Failure

Low-Medium· Low

Massive AI infrastructure capex fails to generate commensurate revenue returns, permanently depressing ROIC.

FV impact
Reduces fair value to $585.59 (Bear Case).

TikTok Engagement Erosion

· Medium

Intensifying competition from short-form video erodes core Family of Apps engagement and ad pricing.

FV impact
-20% to base fair value.

Reality Labs Perpetual Sink

Medium-High· Low

Reality Labs fails to reach commercial viability, acting as a permanent and expanding multi-billion dollar capital sink.

FV impact
-15% to base fair value.
Early-warning signals to monitor
MetricCurrentTrigger threshold
Capex-to-revenue structurally exceeding 35% without ad yield expansion.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Consecutive quarters of declining daily active users.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Reality Labs operating losses accelerating past $25B annually.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Deteriorating return on ad spend (ROAS) for advertisers.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Failure to maintain leadership in open-source AI foundations.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Financial history

Income statement — last six periods
Line itemT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4CAGR
Period2021-12-312022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Revenue$116.61B$134.90B$164.50B$200.97B+14.6%
Gross profit$91.36B$108.94B$134.34B$164.79B+15.9%
Operating income$28.94B$46.75B$69.38B$83.28B+30.2%
Net income$23.20B$39.10B$62.36B$60.46B+27.1%
EPS (diluted)$13.77$8.59$14.87$23.86+14.7%
EBITDA$37.69B$59.05B$86.88B$105.71B+29.4%
R&D$35.34B$38.48B$43.87B$57.37B+12.9%
SG&A$27.08B$23.71B$21.09B$24.14B-2.8%

Quality scores

Piotroski F-score
5 / 9
0–9 quality composite
Altman Z-score
8.96
Bankruptcy risk (>3 safe)
Beneish M-score
-3.01
Earnings manipulation risk
OCF / Net income
1.92×
>1 indicates high earnings quality
Accounting quality gate
Pass
Sector-adjusted gate
ROIC
19.9%
Return on invested capital
§3

Numbers analysis

Cash flow

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCF / net income, accounting-quality, and ROIC rows above.

Capital allocation

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Individual subscribers — §4 onwards11 more sections

Read the full analysis — 11 more sections.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Full report for every covered ticker
24 months of rating archive
Watchlist briefings + rating-change alerts
PDF + DOCX export in any language
Start free trial
Cancel anytime.
FAQ

META — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest independent analysis, META looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $617 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $797 (range $586–$1006), which implies roughly 29.1% upside to the midpoint.