Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
ON trades against a final fair-value range of $17.19-$28.02, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $17.2, high $28.0, with mid-point at $22.4.
Stock analysis

ON ON Semiconductor Corporation fair value $22–$28

ON
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analyzed: 2026-05-10Next update: 2026-08-10Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature compounderNASDAQ · Information Technology
View archive
Last price
$103.20
▼ -80.80 (-78.29%)
Fair value
$22
$22–$28
Rating
Sell
confidence 45/100
Upside
-78.3%
upside to fair value
Margin of Safety
$19.04
buy below · 15%
Market Cap
$40.4B
P/E fwd 24.2

§1 Executive summary

  • Composite fair value $22 with high case $28.
  • Implied downside of 78.3% to fair value.
  • Moat 6.5/10 · confidence 45/100 · Mature compounder.
  • Currently screens above fair value, so patience matters more than entry speed.
Fair value
$22
Margin of safety
-360.7%
Confidence
45/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$103.20Price
FV $22.40
High $28.02

ON trades against a final fair-value range of $17.19-$28.02, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • High switching costs in automotive
    High switching costs in automotive and industrial design wins.
  • Scale advantages and specialized internal
    Scale advantages and specialized internal manufacturing capabilities.
  • Cycle upside
    Accelerating EV adoption and factory automation drive tight power semiconductor supply.

§2 Bear case

A protracted global manufacturing recession coupled with stalled EV adoption permanently impairs revenue growthRevenue growthYear-over-year change in revenue, expressed as a percentage. The starting point for any forward-earnings model and the lens through which scale, mix, and pricing power become visible. to low single digits. Structural capexCapital expendituresCash spent on acquiring or upgrading property, plant, and equipment. Splits into maintenance capex (sustaining current capacity) and growth capex (expanding capacity). requirements for underutilized SiC fabs drag free cash flow conversion below historical averages, compressing the terminal multipleTerminal multipleThe exit P/E or EV/EBITDA we apply to the final year of an explicit forecast. Anchored to the business's long-run quality and the prevailing risk-free rate. to 12x.

Ways this thesis can break

SiC Commoditization

· Medium

Aggressive capacity expansion by competitors commoditizes the SiC power market, driving gross margins permanently below 30%.

FV impact
Severe

Prolonged Auto Downturn

· High

Global auto production volumes decline and EV penetration plateaus, leaving ON with significant stranded fab capacity.

FV impact
High

Structural Capex Escalation

· Medium

Next-generation SiC node migrations require higher-than-expected capital intensity, permanently suppressing FCF generation despite revenue growth.

FV impact
Moderate
Early-warning signals to monitor
MetricCurrentTrigger threshold
Gross margin structurally declining below 35 percent.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Capex-to-revenue ratio exceeding 20 percent for consecutive quarters.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Deteriorating market share in global EV silicon carbide design wins.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Inventory days outstanding rising above 150 days systemically.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Management officially walking back long-term free cash flow margin targets.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Financial history

Income statement — last six periods
Line itemT−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
Period2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Revenue$8.33B$8.25B$7.08B$6.00B-10.4%
Gross profit$4.08B$3.88B$3.22B$1.98B-21.3%
Operating income$2.76B$2.61B$1.90B$751.1M-35.2%
Net income$1.90B$2.18B$1.57B$121.0M-60.1%
EPS (diluted)$4.24$4.89$3.63$0.29-59.1%
EBITDA$3.01B$3.22B$2.54B$888.2M-33.4%
R&D$600.2M$577.3M$612.7M$583.6M-0.9%
SG&A$631.1M$641.5M$649.8M$604.8M-1.4%

Quality scores

OCF / Net income
14.54×
>1 indicates high earnings quality
Accounting quality gate
Fail
Sector-adjusted gate
ROIC
1.5%
Return on invested capital
§3

Numbers analysis

Individual subscribers — §4 onwards11 more sections

Read the full analysis — 11 more sections.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Full report for every covered ticker
24 months of rating archive
Watchlist briefings + rating-change alerts
PDF + DOCX export in any language
Start free trial
Cancel anytime.
FAQ

ON — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, ON looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $103 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $22.4 (range $17.2–$28.0), which implies roughly 78.3% downside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of ON also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder
Same sector: Information Technology