Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
PEP trades against a final fair-value range of $142.66-$206.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $143, high $206, with mid-point at $174.
Stock analysis

PEP PepsiCo Inc. fair value $174–$206

PEP
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analyzed: 2026-05-08Next update: 2026-08-08Methodology v2.4Archetype: Mature dividendNASDAQ · Consumer Staples
View archive
Last price
$154.62
▲ +19.79 (+12.80%)
Fair value
$174
$174–$206
Rating
Buy
confidence 88/100
Upside
+12.8%
upside to fair value
Margin of Safety
$148.25
buy below · 15%
Market Cap
$211.4B
P/E fwd 16.9

§1 Executive summary

  • Composite fair value $174 with high case $206.
  • Implied upside of 12.8% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 88/100 · Mature dividend.
  • Trades at a measured discount to fair value with adequate margin of safety.
Fair value
$174
Margin of safety
+11.3%
Confidence
88/100
Moat
9/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$154.62Price
FV $174.41
High $206.45

PEP trades against a final fair-value range of $142.66-$206.45, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • Deep global distribution networks covering
    Deep global distribution networks covering developed and emerging markets.
  • Immense brand equity and pricing
    Immense brand equity and pricing power across both beverage and snack portfolios.
  • Bull thesis
    Valuation synthesis intentionally anchors heavily on Forward Earnings to mitigate terminal value dominance.

§2 Bear case

A sustained macroeconomic downturn coupled with accelerated adoption of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs leads to structural volume declines and an inability to offset cost inflation through pricing, heavily compressing operating margins and driving free cash flow below historical norms.

Ways this thesis can break

GLP-1 Widespread Adoption

· Medium

Mass adoption of appetite-suppressing GLP-1 drugs permanently reduces per-capita consumption of high-calorie snacks and sugary beverages, breaking historical volume baselines.

FV impact
-25%
Trigger
3-5 years

Total Loss of Pricing Power

· Low

Consumer fatigue over successive price hikes forces aggressive discounting and promotional activity to defend market share against private label brands, destroying gross margins.

FV impact
-20%
Trigger
1-2 years

Supply Chain and Input Cost Shock

· Medium

Extreme agricultural commodity inflation and localized supply chain disruptions structurally elevate the cost base beyond what can be passed to consumers, permanently compressing operating margins.

FV impact
-15%
Trigger
1-3 years
Early-warning signals to monitor
MetricCurrentTrigger threshold
Consecutive quarters of negative organic volume growth.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross margin compression exceeding 150 basis points.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Substantial shift in market share to private label brands.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Significant downward revisions in forward consensus earnings.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Unplanned increases in promotional spend to clear inventory.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Financial history

Income statement — last six periods
Line itemT−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
Period2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Revenue$86.39B$91.47B$91.85B$93.93B+2.8%
Gross profit$45.82B$49.59B$50.11B$50.86B+3.5%
Operating income$11.36B$12.91B$12.92B$13.49B+5.9%
Net income$8.91B$9.07B$9.58B$8.24B-2.6%
EPS (diluted)$6.42$6.56$6.95$6.00-2.2%
EBITDA$14.92B$15.75B$16.68B$15.54B+1.4%
R&D
SG&A$34.46B$36.68B$37.19B$37.37B+2.7%

Quality scores

Piotroski F-score
5 / 9
0–9 quality composite
Altman Z-score
3.59
Bankruptcy risk (>3 safe)
Beneish M-score
-2.56
Earnings manipulation risk
OCF / Net income
1.47×
>1 indicates high earnings quality
Accounting quality gate
Pass
Sector-adjusted gate
ROIC
12.8%
Return on invested capital
§3

Numbers analysis

Individual subscribers — §4 onwards11 more sections

Read the full analysis — 11 more sections.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Full report for every covered ticker
24 months of rating archive
Watchlist briefings + rating-change alerts
PDF + DOCX export in any language
Start free trial
Cancel anytime.
FAQ

PEP — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, PEP looks modestly undervalued. The current price is $155 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $174 (range $143–$206), which implies roughly 12.8% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of PEP also follow

Same archetype: mature-dividend
Same sector: Consumer Staples