Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
HUBS trades against a final fair-value range of $34.65-$61.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $34.6, high $61.5, with mid-point at $47.9.
Stock analysis

HUBS HUBS fair value $35–$62

HUBS
By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analyzed: 2026-05-10Next update: 2026-08-10Methodology v2.5Review: automatedArchetype: Mature compounder
View archive
Last price
$197.34
▼ -149.47 (-75.74%)
Fair value
$48
$35–$62
Rating
Sell
confidence 59/100
Upside
-75.7%
upside to fair value
Margin of Safety
$40.69
MoS level · 15%
Market Cap
$10.1B
P/E fwd 12.7

§1 Executive summary

  • Composite fair value $48 with high case $62.
  • Implied downside of 75.7% to fair value.
  • Moat 6.5/10 · confidence 59/100 · Mature compounder.
  • Currently screens above fair value, so patience matters more than entry speed.
Fair value
$48
Margin of safety
-312.2%
Confidence
59/100
Moat
6.5/10

Educational analysis only — not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence.

$197.34Price
Low $34.65
Mid $47.87
High $61.51

HUBS trades against a final fair-value range of $34.65-$61.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • High switching costs driven by
    High switching costs driven by deep operational integration across marketing, sales, and service hubs.
  • Comprehensive all-in-one ecosystem tailored for
    Comprehensive all-in-one ecosystem tailored for the mid-market and SMB demographic.
  • Bull thesis
    Contrarian reality: The market is severely mispricing structural FCF limits and ignoring real shareholder dilution.

§2 Bear case

A sustained 20% drop in SMB IT spend coupled with stagnant enterprise migration severely pressures the 20% long-term operating marginOperating marginOperating income (EBIT) divided by revenue. Captures profitability after both direct costs and operating expenses but before interest, tax, and non-operating items. target, leading to rapid multiple contraction.

Ways this thesis can break

SMB Macroeconomic Collapse

· Medium

A severe recession drives mass insolvency and seat reductions among core SMB customers, devastating revenue and driving massive structural churn.

FV impact
Severe
Trigger
1-2 years

Enterprise Penetration Failure

· High

Failure to gain sustained traction upmarket caps growth rates while the legacy SMB segment saturates, permanently stalling margin expansion.

FV impact
High
Trigger
2-3 years

SBC Dilution Spirals

· Medium

Stock-based compensation burden grows unchecked without commensurate core free cash flow growth, severely diluting existing shareholders.

FV impact
High
Trigger
3-5 years
Early-warning signals to monitor
MetricCurrentTrigger threshold
Sustained deceleration in total net-new customer logo additions.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Reversal in ARPU trends as seat downgrades and discounting accelerate.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenue exceeding 20%.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Core gross margin compression structurally falling below 80%.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Failure to clear interim 10% GAAP operating margin targets.MonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Financial history

Income statement — last six periods
Line itemT−0T−1T−2T−3CAGR
Period2022-12-312023-12-312024-12-312025-12-31Trend
Revenue$1.73B$2.17B$2.63B$3.13B+21.8%
Gross profit$1.42B$1.83B$2.23B$2.62B+22.6%
Operating income$-102.9M$-104.1M$-63.6M$11.4M
Net income$-107.3M$-164.5M$4.6M$45.9M
EPS (diluted)$-2.35$-3.30$0.09$0.86
EBITDA$-36.5M$-74.1M$129.2M$206.6M
R&D$442.0M$617.7M$778.7M$905.9M+27.0%
SG&A$1.08B$1.32B$1.52B$1.71B+16.3%

Quality scores

Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
0–9 quality composite
Altman Z-score
4.3
Bankruptcy risk (>3 safe)
Beneish M-score
-3.01
Earnings manipulation risk
OCF / Net income
16.57×
>1 indicates high earnings quality
Accounting quality gate
Pass
Sector-adjusted gate
ROIC
2.4%
Return on invested capital
§3

Numbers analysis

Cash flow

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCFOperating cash flowCash generated from the company's core operations after working-capital changes but before capital expenditures. The first line of the cash-flow statement. / net incomeNet IncomeNet Income is an income-statement line item used to reconcile revenue to operating profit, pre-tax income, net income, or per-share earnings. It should be compared across periods and against peer disclosure conventions., accounting-quality, and ROICROICReturn on invested capital. Operating profit (after tax) divided by invested capital. The single best gauge of capital-efficiency. Spread over WACC = economic value created. rows above.

Capital allocation

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Individual subscribers — §4 onwards11 more sections

Read the full analysis — 11 more sections.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Full report for every covered ticker
24 months of rating archive
Watchlist briefings + rating-change alerts
PDF + DOCX export in any language
Start free trial
Cancel anytime.
FAQ

HUBS — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, HUBS looks meaningfully overvalued. The current price is $197 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $47.9 (range $34.6–$61.5), which implies roughly 75.7% downside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of HUBS also follow

Same archetype: mature-compounder