Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
NVDA trades against a final fair-value range of $223.19-$527.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $223, high $528, with mid-point at $377.
Stock analysis

NVDA fair value $223–$528

By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
已分析: 2026-05-22下次更新: 2026-08-22Methodology v2.4Data cut-off: Quality gate: passSources: all material sources passed deterministic freshness/provenance gatesReview: automatedArchetype: Hyper-growth
View archive
股价
$219.51
▲ +157.82 (+71.90%)
公允价值
$377
$223–$528
评级
强力买入
confidence 80/100
上行空间
+71.9%
upside to fair value
安全边际
$320.73
MoS level · 15%
市值
$5.32T
P/E fwd 17.4
英文原文ZH
翻译期间显示英文原文
此报告尚未翻译。翻译队列赶上后请在几分钟内刷新。

§1 执行摘要

  • Composite fair value $377 with high case $528.
  • Implied upside of 71.9% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 80/100 · Hyper-growth.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$377
Margin of safety
+41.8%
Confidence
80/100
Moat
9/10

Educational research only - not investment advice, an offer, or a trade instruction. Confirm current data and do your own due diligence before acting.

$219.51Price
Low $223.19
Mid $377.33
High $527.51

NVDA trades against a final fair-value range of $223.19-$527.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • CUDA ecosystem
    4M+ developer base, deep library stack (cuDNN, TensorRT, NCCL); retraining costs and workflow dependencies create multi-year switching barriers for AI training
  • Architecture roadmap
    Blackwell → Rubin → post-Rubin generational cadence sustains price/performance premium; competitors are consistently one to two architecture generations behind
  • Bull thesis
    Bull perspective: AI supercycle durability + CUDA lock-in + Blackwell/Rubin cadence sustain 73%+ gross margin and support $450–528 fair value over 24 months

§2 看空情景

Combined bear stress — AI capexCapital expendituresCash spent on acquiring or upgrading property, plant, and equipment. Splits into maintenance capex (sustaining current capacity) and growth capex (expanding capacity). digestion (-25% hyperscaler spend in FY2028), 15pp GPU training share loss, and one export control escalation — reduces NVDA FY2028 revenueRevenueRevenue is an income-statement line item used to reconcile revenue to operating profit, pre-tax income, net income, or per-share earnings. It should be compared across periods and against peer disclosure conventions. to ~$270B (vs $508B base). Gross margins compress to 65%, operating marginOperating marginOperating income (EBIT) divided by revenue. Captures profitability after both direct costs and operating expenses but before interest, tax, and non-operating items. to 48%, EPSEarnings per shareNet income divided by weighted-average diluted shares outstanding. The headline accounting earnings figure on a per-share basis. to ~$5.50. Applying 20x mature-semiconductor terminal multipleTerminal multipleThe exit P/E or EV/EBITDA we apply to the final year of an explicit forecast. Anchored to the business's long-run quality and the prevailing risk-free rate. yields a stress fair valueFair valueOur composite estimate of intrinsic per-share value, blended across DCF, exit-multiple, and reverse-DCF methods. Reported as a low/mid/high range to capture model uncertainty. of $110–130. This scenario requires simultaneous occurrence of three adverse catalysts; standalone probability is 5–8%. Near-term balance sheet support (net cash $51.5B, Altman Z 57.3) limits survivability risk.

该论点可能失败的方式

AI capex cycle peak and digestion

15%· Low

Hyperscalers cut AI infrastructure spending 20–30% in FY2028 after capacity digestion and disappointing near-term AI ROI. Data center revenue plateaus at $280–300B by FY2028 vs $508B internal valuation cross-check. Revenue growth decelerates to single digits and the stock de-rates to a 20–22x mature semiconductor multiple.

FV impact
~$175–200 (-9% to -20% from current price)
Trigger
FY2028–2029

Custom ASIC displaces GPU in AI training workloads

10%· Low

Hyperscaler proprietary chips (TPU, Trainium, Maia) capture 25–30% of AI training compute within three years, compressing NVIDIA ASP and gross margins toward 65%. Pricing power erodes; operating margin falls 1,000bps from the FY2026 peak. The CUDA ecosystem advantage is circumvented rather than replicated.

FV impact
~$150–180 (-18% to -32%)
Trigger
FY2028–2030

Escalating US export controls eliminate remaining China exposure

10%· Low

Further restrictions beyond H20 ban eliminate all advanced AI chip sales to China, reducing addressable market by 15%+ and removing the incremental downside-cycle revenue floor. Geopolitical escalation accelerates customer dual-sourcing mandates globally.

FV impact
~$200–240 (-9% to +9%)
Trigger
6–18 months

Structural gross margin compression to sub-68%

8%· Low

Competitive pricing from AMD MI-series and hyperscaler custom silicon forces ASP reductions. Simultaneously, Blackwell production ramp yields unfavorable mix. Gross margin falls below 68% for two or more consecutive quarters, triggering multiple compression as internal valuation cross-check downgrades the quality premium.

FV impact
~$210–260 (-4% to +18%)
Trigger
FY2027–2028
需关注的早期预警信号
指标当前触发阈值
Data center revenue growth falls below 20% YoY for two consecutive quarters without management guidance upgradeMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross margin declines below 70% for any single quarter without re-acceleration guidanceMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Hyperscaler aggregate capital expenditure guidance cuts exceeding 20% on any quarterly earnings cycleMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Custom ASIC share of documented AI training deployments exceeds 15% based on public cloud provider disclosuresMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
OCF/NI ratio falls below 0.70 or accruals ratio exceeds 0.15 in any trailing-twelve-month periodMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Inventory write-down exceeding $2B in any single quarter, confirming demand pull-forward hypothesisMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 财务历史

损益表 — 最近六期
项目T−0T−1T−2T−3T−4T−5T−6T−7T−8T−9CAGR
期间2023-01-292023-01-312023-12-312024-01-282024-01-312024-12-312025-01-312025-12-312026-01-312026-05-22Trend
营业收入$26.97B$26.97B$26.97B$60.92B$60.92B$60.92B$130.50B$130.50B$215.94B$215.94B+26.0%
毛利$15.36B$15.36B$44.30B$44.30B$97.86B$153.46B+29.1%
营业利润$4.22B$5.58B$32.97B$32.97B$81.45B$130.39B+46.4%
净利润$4.37B$4.37B$4.37B$29.76B$29.76B$29.76B$72.88B$72.88B$120.07B$120.07B+44.5%
每股收益(摊薄)$0.17$0.17$1.19$1.19$2.94$4.90+45.3%
EBITDA$5.77B$5.99B$34.48B$35.58B$86.14B$144.55B+43.0%
研发$7.34B$7.34B$8.68B$8.68B$12.91B$18.50B+10.8%
销售管理费用$2.44B$2.44B$2.65B$2.65B$3.49B$4.58B+7.2%

质量评分

Piotroski F 评分
4 / 9
0–9 质量综合
Altman Z 评分
57.3
破产风险 (>3 安全)
Beneish M 评分
-1.13
盈利操纵风险
OCF / 净利润
0.86×
>1 表示盈利质量高
会计质量门槛
Fail
经行业调整门槛
ROIC
66.5%
投入资本回报率
第 3 节

Numbers analysis

现金流

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCFOperating cash flowCash generated from the company's core operations after working-capital changes but before capital expenditures. The first line of the cash-flow statement. / net incomeNet IncomeNet Income is an income-statement line item used to reconcile revenue to operating profit, pre-tax income, net income, or per-share earnings. It should be compared across periods and against peer disclosure conventions., accounting-quality, and ROICROICReturn on invested capital. Operating profit (after tax) divided by invested capital. The single best gauge of capital-efficiency. Spread over WACC = economic value created. rows above.

资本配置

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

个人订阅用户 — §4 及之后还有 11 个章节

阅读完整分析 — 还有 11 个章节。

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

涵盖每个股票的完整报告
24 个月的评级存档
关注列表简报 + 评级变更提醒
以任意语言导出 PDF + DOCX
开始免费试用
可随时取消。
SCENARIOS FAQ

NVDA scenarios questions

  1. Each scenario for NVDA (NVDA) carries a five-year price target, an explicit set of assumptions (growth, terminal multiple, margin path), and a probability weight calibrated against current visibility.
FAQ

NVDA — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, NVDA looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $220 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $377 (range $223–$528), which implies roughly 71.9% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of NVDA also follow

Same archetype: hyper-growth