Skip to content
StockMarketAgent
Direct answer
NVDA trades against a final fair-value range of $223.19-$527.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs. Fair value range: low $223, high $528, with mid-point at $377.
Stock analysis

NVDA fair value $223–$528

By StockMarketAgent.AI team· supervised by
Analyzed: 2026-05-22Next update: 2026-08-22Methodology v2.4Data cut-off: Quality gate: passSources: all material sources passed deterministic freshness/provenance gatesReview: automatedArchetype: Hyper-growth
View archive
Last price
$219.51
▲ +157.82 (+71.90%)
Fair value
$377
$223–$528
Rating
Strong Buy
confidence 80/100
Upside
+71.9%
upside to fair value
Margin of Safety
$320.73
MoS level · 15%
Market Cap
$5.32T
P/E fwd 17.4

§1 Executive summary

  • Composite fair value $377 with high case $528.
  • Implied upside of 71.9% to fair value.
  • Moat 9/10 · confidence 80/100 · Hyper-growth.
  • Trades below fair value with a meaningful cushion to the midpoint.
Fair value
$377
Margin of safety
+41.8%
Confidence
80/100
Moat
9/10

Educational research only - not investment advice, an offer, or a trade instruction. Confirm current data and do your own due diligence before acting.

$219.51Price
Low $223.19
Mid $377.33
High $527.51

NVDA trades against a final fair-value range of $223.19-$527.51, with the midpoint set by the accepted valuation synthesis rather than earlier draft model outputs.

  • CUDA ecosystem
    4M+ developer base, deep library stack (cuDNN, TensorRT, NCCL); retraining costs and workflow dependencies create multi-year switching barriers for AI training
  • Architecture roadmap
    Blackwell → Rubin → post-Rubin generational cadence sustains price/performance premium; competitors are consistently one to two architecture generations behind
  • Bull thesis
    Bull perspective: AI supercycle durability + CUDA lock-in + Blackwell/Rubin cadence sustain 73%+ gross margin and support $450–528 fair value over 24 months

§2 Bear case

Combined bear stress — AI capexCapital expendituresCash spent on acquiring or upgrading property, plant, and equipment. Splits into maintenance capex (sustaining current capacity) and growth capex (expanding capacity). digestion (-25% hyperscaler spend in FY2028), 15pp GPU training share loss, and one export control escalation — reduces NVDA FY2028 revenueRevenueRevenue is an income-statement line item used to reconcile revenue to operating profit, pre-tax income, net income, or per-share earnings. It should be compared across periods and against peer disclosure conventions. to ~$270B (vs $508B base). Gross margins compress to 65%, operating marginOperating marginOperating income (EBIT) divided by revenue. Captures profitability after both direct costs and operating expenses but before interest, tax, and non-operating items. to 48%, EPSEarnings per shareNet income divided by weighted-average diluted shares outstanding. The headline accounting earnings figure on a per-share basis. to ~$5.50. Applying 20x mature-semiconductor terminal multipleTerminal multipleThe exit P/E or EV/EBITDA we apply to the final year of an explicit forecast. Anchored to the business's long-run quality and the prevailing risk-free rate. yields a stress fair valueFair valueOur composite estimate of intrinsic per-share value, blended across DCF, exit-multiple, and reverse-DCF methods. Reported as a low/mid/high range to capture model uncertainty. of $110–130. This scenario requires simultaneous occurrence of three adverse catalysts; standalone probability is 5–8%. Near-term balance sheet support (net cash $51.5B, Altman Z 57.3) limits survivability risk.

Ways this thesis can break

AI capex cycle peak and digestion

15%· Low

Hyperscalers cut AI infrastructure spending 20–30% in FY2028 after capacity digestion and disappointing near-term AI ROI. Data center revenue plateaus at $280–300B by FY2028 vs $508B internal valuation cross-check. Revenue growth decelerates to single digits and the stock de-rates to a 20–22x mature semiconductor multiple.

FV impact
~$175–200 (-9% to -20% from current price)
Trigger
FY2028–2029

Custom ASIC displaces GPU in AI training workloads

10%· Low

Hyperscaler proprietary chips (TPU, Trainium, Maia) capture 25–30% of AI training compute within three years, compressing NVIDIA ASP and gross margins toward 65%. Pricing power erodes; operating margin falls 1,000bps from the FY2026 peak. The CUDA ecosystem advantage is circumvented rather than replicated.

FV impact
~$150–180 (-18% to -32%)
Trigger
FY2028–2030

Escalating US export controls eliminate remaining China exposure

10%· Low

Further restrictions beyond H20 ban eliminate all advanced AI chip sales to China, reducing addressable market by 15%+ and removing the incremental downside-cycle revenue floor. Geopolitical escalation accelerates customer dual-sourcing mandates globally.

FV impact
~$200–240 (-9% to +9%)
Trigger
6–18 months

Structural gross margin compression to sub-68%

8%· Low

Competitive pricing from AMD MI-series and hyperscaler custom silicon forces ASP reductions. Simultaneously, Blackwell production ramp yields unfavorable mix. Gross margin falls below 68% for two or more consecutive quarters, triggering multiple compression as internal valuation cross-check downgrades the quality premium.

FV impact
~$210–260 (-4% to +18%)
Trigger
FY2027–2028
Early-warning signals to monitor
MetricCurrentTrigger threshold
Data center revenue growth falls below 20% YoY for two consecutive quarters without management guidance upgradeMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Gross margin declines below 70% for any single quarter without re-acceleration guidanceMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Hyperscaler aggregate capital expenditure guidance cuts exceeding 20% on any quarterly earnings cycleMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Custom ASIC share of documented AI training deployments exceeds 15% based on public cloud provider disclosuresMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
OCF/NI ratio falls below 0.70 or accruals ratio exceeds 0.15 in any trailing-twelve-month periodMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis
Inventory write-down exceeding $2B in any single quarter, confirming demand pull-forward hypothesisMonitorDeterioration versus the report thesis

§3 Financial history

Income statement — last six periods
Line itemT−0T−1T−2T−3T−4T−5T−6T−7T−8T−9CAGR
Period2023-01-292023-01-312023-12-312024-01-282024-01-312024-12-312025-01-312025-12-312026-01-312026-05-22Trend
Revenue$26.97B$26.97B$26.97B$60.92B$60.92B$60.92B$130.50B$130.50B$215.94B$215.94B+26.0%
Gross profit$15.36B$15.36B$44.30B$44.30B$97.86B$153.46B+29.1%
Operating income$4.22B$5.58B$32.97B$32.97B$81.45B$130.39B+46.4%
Net income$4.37B$4.37B$4.37B$29.76B$29.76B$29.76B$72.88B$72.88B$120.07B$120.07B+44.5%
EPS (diluted)$0.17$0.17$1.19$1.19$2.94$4.90+45.3%
EBITDA$5.77B$5.99B$34.48B$35.58B$86.14B$144.55B+43.0%
R&D$7.34B$7.34B$8.68B$8.68B$12.91B$18.50B+10.8%
SG&A$2.44B$2.44B$2.65B$2.65B$3.49B$4.58B+7.2%

Quality scores

Piotroski F-score
4 / 9
0–9 quality composite
Altman Z-score
57.3
Bankruptcy risk (>3 safe)
Beneish M-score
-1.13
Earnings manipulation risk
OCF / Net income
0.86×
>1 indicates high earnings quality
Accounting quality gate
Fail
Sector-adjusted gate
ROIC
66.5%
Return on invested capital
§3

Numbers analysis

Cash flow

Cash-flow quality is reflected in the OCFOperating cash flowCash generated from the company's core operations after working-capital changes but before capital expenditures. The first line of the cash-flow statement. / net incomeNet IncomeNet Income is an income-statement line item used to reconcile revenue to operating profit, pre-tax income, net income, or per-share earnings. It should be compared across periods and against peer disclosure conventions., accounting-quality, and ROICROICReturn on invested capital. Operating profit (after tax) divided by invested capital. The single best gauge of capital-efficiency. Spread over WACC = economic value created. rows above.

Capital allocation

Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.

Individual subscribers — §4 onwards11 more sections

Read the full analysis — 11 more sections.

Competitive moat, industry cycle, peer comparison, intrinsic valuation, sensitivity, scenarios, earnings decision tree, position management, investor perspectives, scorecard, and final recommendation.

Full report for every covered ticker
24 months of rating archive
Watchlist briefings + rating-change alerts
PDF + DOCX export in any language
Start free trial
Cancel anytime.
REVERSE DCF FAQ

NVDA reverse dcf questions

  1. Reverse DCF for NVDA (NVDA) backs out the revenue or earnings growth rate the current share price implies, holding terminal value, margin, and discount-rate assumptions constant.
FAQ

NVDA — frequently asked questions

  1. Based on our latest analysis, NVDA looks meaningfully undervalued. The current price is $220 versus a composite fair-value midpoint of $377 (range $223–$528), which implies roughly 71.9% upside to the midpoint.
Related coverage

Names readers of NVDA also follow

Same archetype: hyper-growth