With your permission, we use privacy-limited analytics to understand which research journeys work. We do not run advertising trackers or session replay. You can change this choice in Preferences. Read the Privacy Policy.
Quote this valuation with its source: Fair value, Potential value and the price at analysis.
FAQ
ADI — frequently asked questions
Is Analog Devices, Inc. overvalued?
In our latest published analysis dated 2026-09-08, ADI looks meaningfully overvalued. The price recorded at analysis is USD 362 versus our fair value of USD 196; the high endpoint is presented separately as potential value of USD 382. That implies roughly 45.8% downside to fair value at that date.
Our latest published report, analyzed 2026-09-08, gives ADI a fair value of USD 196 and a potential value of USD 382. The conclusion is triangulated across multiple valuation models and weighted by reliability for Analog Devices, Inc.'s archetype; it is a dated research output, not a live price.
Should I buy ADI now?
Our latest published rating for ADI, analyzed 2026-09-08, is Sell. Analog Devices, Inc. looks meaningfully overvalued at the analysis-date price of USD 362 versus fair value of USD 196; potential value is USD 382. This is research for educational purposes, not personalized investment advice.
What are the biggest risks for ADI?
The dedicated bear-case section in our report analyzed 2026-09-08 documents Analog Devices, Inc.'s material risks, evidence, thresholds, and thesis-invalidation conditions. Scenario-specific explanations remain in that section so the report does not repeat or decontextualize them elsewhere.
What is ADI's rating?
Our latest published rating for ADI, analyzed 2026-09-08, is Sell, with a published moat assessment of 1/10 (None). It reflects our fair value of USD 196, the potential value of USD 382, and the price recorded at analysis (USD 362).
Upside can persist if higher FY2027 revenue and adjusted-EPS expectations are delivered and positive industrial growth improves cost absorption while free cash flow remains positive.
Main risk
The FY2027 analyst-consensus annual revenue estimate falls below $17.00 billion in two consecutive post-event updates.
Sell. The report-date price exceeds Fair value, so the expected recovery does not offset valuation risk.3
The report was prepared at $362.25 on 2026-09-04. Fair value is $196.19, while the secondary Potential value is $382.12 as of 2026-09-08.3
The main risk is the FY2027 revenue estimate falling below $17.00 billion for two consecutive post-event snapshots. Two such readings would signal weaker expected demand. If realized sales then fall, fixed-cost absorption and free cash flow would weaken.
Higher FY2027 revenue and adjusted-EPS expectations can support upside if positive industrial growth improves cost absorption and free cash flow stays positive. Upside may fade if the revenue estimate breaks its low endpoint across consecutive snapshots or industrial revenue contracts.1,4,6
Cycle upside
The favorable cycle requires continued industrial growth and delivery of the higher FY2026 and FY2027 revenue expectations. That would improve cost absorption and cash generation.1
Evidence-backed thesis
Sell because the report-date price stands materially above Fair value.3
Cycle upside
The favorable cycle requires continued industrial growth and delivery of the higher FY2026 and FY2027 revenue expectations. That would improve cost absorption and cash generation.1
House recommendation
Sell because the report-date price stands materially above Fair value.3
Company overview
The following table summarizes revenue by sales channel. Analog Devices, Inc. sells its products globally through a direct sales force, third-party distributors, independent sales representatives and via its website.
Distributors are customers that buy products with the intention of reselling them. The Company sells its products globally through a direct sales force, third-party distributors, independent sales representatives and via its website.
The cited facts establish a large industrial revenue base and concentrated distributor channels, but not a cost advantage or distribution control. No cited mechanism establishes switching costs, software integration, pricing power, or customer retention. FY2025 cash generation shows resilience, not the source of a moat.
QCOM, TXN, MCHP, and MRVL belong as semiconductor operating comparisons, but each differs in growth, margins, scale, or valuation. They are cross-checks rather than interchangeable businesses.
FY2025 free cash flow of $4.28 billion shows that ADI generated substantial cash in that period. It does not show that customers face switching costs or that ADI controls pricing.4
The highlighted cell is Fair value when every assumption sits at its base level ($196.19). Each row and column shows what Fair value becomes when one assumption moves.
Free cash flow to the firm stays positive in the first projected year at $4.1B after modeled capex of $533.6M, with terminal value at 61.8% of . A sudden drop in free cash flow is not projected unless capital spending relative to , reinvestment, or resets materially.
Trigger: FY2027 revenue and adjusted EPS above the analyst-consensus means, with positive industrial growth as a future confirmation condition.1
A beat can extend upside if industrial growth stays positive, because the largest operating market would support sales and cost absorption. The signal fades if FY2027 estimates weaken across updates or industrial revenue contracts.
In-line
Continue reducing existing exposure.
Trigger: FY2027 revenue and adjusted EPS near the analyst-consensus means; industrial growth remains a future confirmation condition.
Industry capital spending equaled 4.4% of revenue and 1.27 times depreciation as of 2026-09-01, retrieved 2026-09-01.
Bull cycle
The favorable cycle requires continued industrial growth and delivery of the higher FY2026 and FY2027 revenue expectations. That would improve cost absorption and cash generation.
Bear cycle
Industrial contraction would reverse the largest market's contribution to growth. Distributor disruption could amplify the downturn by reducing shipments before costs adjust.
Positioning
Industrial was the largest FY2025 market, while automotive supplied material diversification. This mix increases recovery leverage but does not remove cycle risk.6
§11 Position management
Sizing
No new allocation; reduce existing exposure. The report-date price of $362.25 exceeds the $196.19 Fair value.3
Risk
Keep exposure falling while price exceeds Fair value, and use the stated operating breaches for a full exit.
Entry tranches
Level
Action
Why
Any price above $196.19 Fair value
§12 Investor perspectives
New investor
Avoid
The report-date price of $362.25 stands above the $196.19 Fair value.3
Existing holder
Avoid
Avoid adding and use strength to reduce exposure while valuation remains above Fair value.
Income-focused investor
Avoid
Positive cash flow supports distributions, but debt above cash and the valuation gap limit the case for holding.3,4
§14 Final recommendation
Action
Sell
Sell because the report-date price materially exceeds Fair value.3
Near-term estimates improved, but direct annual support ends at FY2027 and does not justify the report-date valuation.
§15Your notes
Capture your own thesis, position size, and follow-up questions. Stays on this device, only you can see it.
Private notes
Visible only to you. Synced to this device.
0 chars
Sources
The records this analysis drew on, as they stood when it was run.
The dedicated bear-case triggers govern this conditional path.
This path applies if recovery or cash-generation checkpoints fail. Its operating triggers and consequences are set out in the dedicated bear-case section.
Ways this thesis can break
Cash generation fails
Annual free cash flow below zero while debt remains above cash would weaken dividends, repurchases, and debt service.3
FV impact
-39.1%
The analyst's bear scenario path and multiple as the base case
Trigger
Within 12 months
Required returns reset higher
A rise exceeding two percentage points from the 2026-09-08 moderate cost of equity would reduce the present value of unchanged cash forecasts.2
FV impact
-17.7%
Cost of capital 2 points higher
Trigger
Within 12 months
Early-warning signals to monitor
The five developments that would weaken our investment case.
If this hypothetical stress occurred, cash available for dividends, repurchases, and debt service would shrink. Because FY2025 debt exceeded cash, financing pressure could rise.
If this hypothetical reset occurred, investors would demand a higher return from unchanged future cash flows. That would reduce their present value and lower value per share.
Current:9.9218% on 2026-09-08
Alert ifMore than two percentage points higher within 12 months
If this prospective estimate break occurred, it would signal weaker expected demand. Lower sales would absorb less of the operating-cost base, pressuring profit and free cash flow.
Current:$18.18 billion mean as of 2026-09-08
Alert ifBelow $17.00 billion for two consecutive post-event snapshots
If this prospective contraction persisted, the largest operating market would subtract from consolidated growth. Lower sales would reverse fixed-cost absorption and reduce earnings and free cash flow.
Alert ifBelow 0% for two consecutive issuer fiscal years
05
Largest distributor exposure
An adverse channel event could reduce shipments and pricing power before costs resize, compressing operating profit and cash generation across the recovery.
China-attributed revenue is material. Use that figure as regional revenue context only; it does not by itself establish demand, manufacturing, trade, or supply effects.6
Unproven customer-retention mechanisms
high
Beyond FY2027
Treat switching costs, integration, pricing power, and retention benefits as unproven. Reassess only if company disclosure links a structural mechanism to customer retention or lower unit costs.
Convert the revenue and margin path into after-tax free cash flow, discount the annual per-share amounts and at , then adjust for signed per current share.
03
Sum of the Parts
Sets Fair value
$330
Lens value
10%
Influence on Fair value
Applicability
Optional
Role
Supporting
Horizon
Present intrinsic value
Method
Value each distinct segment, subtract corporate overhead and net debt, add probability-weighted optionality, and divide by diluted shares.
Limitation: Terminal value is 71.8% of this model's value, above the 60% level at which the methodology flags concentration; the value leans on the years beyond the explicit forecast.
Positive industrial and communications growth beyond FY2027 would support sales and cost absorption. Their FY2025 revenue bases show importance, not assured durability.6
Upside fades if FY2027 revenue estimates remain below the cited low endpoint across consecutive snapshots, industrial revenue contracts across consecutive fiscal years, or free cash flow turns negative.1
This path needs durable growth after direct annual forecast evidence ends. Industrial contraction or weakening estimates would cause the upside to fade.
FY2025 debt of $8.67 billion exceeded cash of $2.50 billion. If free cash flow weakens, that gap could reduce capital-allocation flexibility; the cited figures alone do not establish a financing shortfall.
Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) trades at 21.5x forward earnings against a peer median of 20.4x. Its EV/EBITDA of 26.3x compares with a peer median of 27.8x. The comparison uses 4 peers: QUALCOMM Incorporated, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Microchip Technology Incorporated and Marvell Technology Inc., as of 2026-09-05 to 2026-09-08.
Below $17.00 billion for two consecutive post-event snapshots
This repeated breach requires a full thesis reassessment and triggers exit of remaining exposure under the stated rule. It weakens expected demand but does not prove that reported operations have already failed.1
If industrial revenue contracts for two consecutive fiscal years, exit remaining exposure because the largest operating market would subtract from consolidated growth and weaken fixed-cost absorption.6
Not every cited input appears here: internal calculations and intermediate model outputs have no external record, and some citations could not be matched to one.
Limitation: Terminal value is 61.8% of this model's value, above the 60% level at which the methodology flags concentration; the value leans on the years beyond the explicit forecast.