With your permission, we use privacy-limited analytics to understand which research journeys work. We do not run advertising trackers or session replay. You can change this choice in Preferences. Read the Privacy Policy.
Quote this valuation with its source: Fair value, Potential value and the price at analysis.
FAQ
ZS — frequently asked questions
Is Zscaler Inc. overvalued?
In our latest published analysis dated 2026-05-09, ZS looks modestly undervalued. The price recorded at analysis is USD 152 versus our fair value of USD 165; the high endpoint is presented separately as potential value of USD 227. That implies roughly 8.3% upside to fair value at that date.
Our latest published report, analyzed 2026-05-09, gives ZS a fair value of USD 165 and a potential value of USD 227. The conclusion is triangulated across multiple valuation models and weighted by reliability for Zscaler Inc.'s archetype; it is a dated research output, not a live price.
Should I buy ZS now?
Our latest published rating for ZS, analyzed 2026-05-09, is Hold. Zscaler Inc. looks modestly undervalued at the analysis-date price of USD 152 versus fair value of USD 165; potential value is USD 227. This is research for educational purposes, not personalized investment advice.
What are the biggest risks for ZS?
The dedicated bear-case section in our report analyzed 2026-05-09 documents Zscaler Inc.'s material risks, evidence, thresholds, and thesis-invalidation conditions. Scenario-specific explanations remain in that section so the report does not repeat or decontextualize them elsewhere.
What is ZS's rating?
Our latest published rating for ZS, analyzed 2026-05-09, is Hold, with a published moat assessment of 6.5/10 (Narrow). It reflects our fair value of USD 165, the potential value of USD 227, and the price recorded at analysis (USD 152).
Bull: Zero Trust adoption accelerates, keeping revenue growth >20% for longer.
Main risk
Platform Bundling Accelerates: Mega-cap competitors successfully bundle Zero Trust solutions, driving severe pricing compression and halting new customer acquisition.
Zscaler is a pure-play cloud security leader benefiting from the secular shift to Zero Trust architecture. While free cash flow is strong, GAAP profitability is suppressed by elevated stock-based compensation and SG&A spending. The thesis hinges on the company's ability to sustain mid-to-high teens revenue growth while gaining significant operating leverage over time.
Zscaler is a pure-play cloud security leader benefiting from the secular shift to Zero Trust architecture. While free cash flow is strong, GAAP profitability is suppressed by elevated stock-based compensation and SG&A spending. The thesis hinges on the company's ability to sustain mid-to-high teens revenue growth while gaining significant operating leverage over time.
Cycle upside
Accelerating enterprise cloud migrations, perimeterless networks, and remote work permanence drive unabated best-of-breed Zero Trust adoption.
House recommendation
Maintain Hold. The current valuation broadly reflects near-term growth, with multiples fully pricing the required transition to mature GAAP profitability.
Company overview
Zscaler, Inc. operates as a cloud security company worldwide. The company offers cyberthreat protection products, including Zscaler Internet Access, which provides threat protection, cloud sandbox, and cloud browser isolation; Zscaler Private Access solution that includes cyberthreat and data protection, application discovery, secure application access, application segmentation, application protection, reduced attack surface, and browser isolation; Zero Trust Firewall; Cloud Sandbox; and Zero Trust Browser. It also provides data security products, such as web and email DLP, endpoint DLP, BYOD security, multi-mode CASB, unified SaaS security, DSPM, AI-SPM, public gen AI security, and Microsoft Copilot data protection; Zero Trust Cloud solution. In addition, the company offers Zero Trust Branch comprising Zero Trust SD-WAN; IoT/OT segmentation; privileged remote access; Zscaler Cellular; and Zscaler Digital Experience that measures end-to-end user experience across business applications, as well as provides an easy-to-understand digital experience score for each user, application, and location within an enterprise. Further, it provides security operations products, including data fabric for security; asset exposure management; Risk360; unified vulnerability management; deception; managed detection and response; and managed threat hunting. Additionally, the company offers Zero Trust Gateway, a fully managed Zscaler service. It serves the automotive, airlines and transportation, conglomerates, consumer goods and retail, energy, financial services, healthcare, insurance, manufacturing, media and communications, public sector and education, technology, and telecommunications services industries. The company was formerly known as SafeChannel, Inc., and changed its name to Zscaler, Inc. in August 2008. Zscaler, Inc. was incorporated in 2007 and is headquartered in San Jose, California.
A prolonged macroeconomic downturn compressing enterprise IT budgets would severely test the premium valuation. If renewals stall and growth drops, the EV/Revenue multiple could collapse, exposing the lack of GAAP earnings support and heavy SBCdilution.
Economic profit is supported when reported returns exceed the company cost-of-capital hurdle.
6.5/ 10
Narrow
Sources of advantage
01High switching costs associated with enterprise network security infrastructure — High switching costs associated with enterprise network security infrastructure and network effects derived from global threat intelligence.Moderate
While internal valuation cross-checks models aggressive targets ($224), our $164.73 base case strictly penalizes SBC and caps long-term margins at the industry median.
§14 Final recommendation
Action
Hold
Hold.
Reassess the thesis against the named valuation, risk, and quarterly checkpoint evidence in this report.
§15Your notes
Capture your own thesis, position size, and follow-up questions. Stays on this device, only you can see it.
Competition from integrated platforms like Microsoft and Palo Alto Networks compresses margins and slows growth. Persistent high SBC continues to heavily dilute equity, eroding per-share value despite continued top-line growth.
Ways this thesis can break
Platform Bundling Accelerates
Medium
Mega-cap competitors successfully bundle Zero Trust solutions, driving severe pricing compression and halting new customer acquisition.
Macroeconomic headwinds and market saturation cause top-line growth to abruptly decelerate below 15% earlier than modeled.
FV impact
Downside to $110.00
Trigger
6-12 months
Early-warning signals to monitor
The five developments that would weaken our investment case.
01
Calculated Billings Growth Rate
Billings lagging revenue indicates shorter contract durations or slowing forward bookings, serving as an early indicator of impending revenue deceleration and multiple compression.
Current:Revenue growth was 23.3% for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Alert ifCalculated billings growth decelerates more than 5 percentage points below revenue growth over two consecutive quarters.
02
Net Expansion Retention Rate
Decelerating net retention reflects enterprise seat downsizing or reduced cross-selling of additional security modules, undermining high organic recurring revenue expansion assumptions.
Current:Revenue was $2.67B for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Alert ifDollar-based net retention rate drops below 115.0% over any quarterly reporting period.
Expanding equity dilution suppresses GAAP profitability and demonstrates a lack of operating leverage, creating friction with institutional investors demanding disciplined unit economics.
Current:Operating margin was -4.8% for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Customer defection and discounting driven by bundled competitive offerings erode unit economics and pricing power, impeding long-term market share gains across core cloud security segments.
Current:Gross margin was 76.9% for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Alert ifGross margin compresses below 72.0% over any two consecutive quarters.
Zero Trust adoption accelerates, keeping revenue growth >20% for longer. Operating leverage kicks in as sales and marketing efficiencies improve, driving operating margins toward the 30% industry benchmark and supporting a premium multiple.
The company sustains mid-to-high teens revenue growth over the medium term. Operating leverage materializes gradually, though persistent SBC limits immediate GAAP profitability. Fair value assumes strict normalization to industry average margins.
If revenue growth exceeds 20% alongside tangible GAAP margin expansion, accumulate. If billings decelerate while SBC remains elevated, trim exposure.
Metrics to watch into the print
01
Metric:
Calculated Billings Growth Rate
CurrentRevenue growth was 23.3% for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Why it matters
Warning level: Calculated billings growth decelerates more than 5 percentage points below revenue growth over two consecutive quarters. Billings lagging revenue indicates shorter contract durations or slowing forward bookings, serving as an early indicator of impending revenue deceleration and multiple compression.
02
Metric:
Net Expansion Retention Rate
CurrentRevenue was $2.67B for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Why it matters
Warning level: Dollar-based net retention rate drops below 115.0% over any quarterly reporting period. Decelerating net retention reflects enterprise seat downsizing or reduced cross-selling of additional security modules, undermining high organic recurring revenue expansion assumptions.
CurrentOperating margin was -4.8% for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Why it matters
Warning level: Stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenue increases by more than 200 basis points year-over-year. Expanding equity dilution suppresses GAAP profitability and demonstrates a lack of operating leverage, creating friction with institutional investors demanding disciplined unit economics.
CurrentGross margin was 76.9% for the period ended 2025-07-31.
Why it matters
Warning level: Gross margin compresses below 72.0% over any two consecutive quarters. Customer defection and discounting driven by bundled competitive offerings erode unit economics and pricing power, impeding long-term market share gains across core cloud security segments.