Optional product analytics
With your permission, we use privacy-limited analytics to understand which research journeys work. We do not run advertising trackers or session replay. You can change this choice in Preferences. Read the Privacy Policy.
Bull: Emerson's high-margin software suites command durable pricing power.
Reduce-side internal valuation cross-checks ($164.87) aggressively prices in perfect execution of the M&A synergy playbook and permanent retention of 24.2% outlier margins.
Emerson Electric is a mature compounder pivoting to a pure-play global automation leader. While mission-critical platforms like DeltaV drive high-margin, sticky software revenues, massive M&A goodwill ($18B) distorts ROIC comparability and introduces significant integration risk.
Emerson Electric is a mature compounder pivoting to a pure-play global automation leader. While mission-critical platforms like DeltaV drive high-margin, sticky software revenues, massive M&A goodwill ($18B) distorts ROIC comparability and introduces significant integration risk.
High switching costs associated with mission-critical process automation platforms like DeltaV.
Sticky, high-margin software and service recurring revenue base.
Reduce-side internal valuation cross-checks ($164.87) aggressively prices in perfect execution of the M&A synergy playbook and permanent retention of 24.2% outlier margins.
Reduce. The composite fair value of $122.21 reflects a conservative 20x exit multiple and 21% normalized margin, properly handicapping M&A execution risks that the market currently ignores.
Emerson Electric Co., a technology and software company, provides various solutions in the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. It operates through Final Control, Measurement & Analytical, Discrete Automation, Safety & Productivity, Control Systems & Software, and Test & Measurement segments. The Final Control segment provides control valves, isolation valves, shutoff valves, pressure relief valves, pressure safety valves, actuators, and regulators for process and hybrid industries under Anderson Greenwood, Bettis, Crosby, Fisher, Keystone, KTM, and Vanessa brands. The Measurement & Analytical segment supplies intelligent instrumentation measuring the physical properties of liquids or gases, such as pressure, temperature, level, flow, acoustics, corrosion, pH, conductivity, water quality, toxic gases, and flame under the Flexim, Micro Motion, and Rosemount brands. The Discrete Automation segment includes solenoid valves, pneumatic valves, valve position indicators, pneumatic cylinders and actuators, air preparation equipment, pressure and temperature switches, electric linear motion solutions, programmable automation control systems and software, electrical distribution equipment, and materials joining solutions used primarily in discrete industries under the Afag, Appleton, ASCO, Aventics, Branson, Movicon, PACSystems, SolaHD, TESCOM, and TopWorx brands. The Safety & Productivity segment delivers tools for professionals and homeowners that support infrastructure, promote safety, and enhance productivity under the Greenlee, Klauke, ProTeam, and RIDGID brands. The Control Systems & Software segment provides control systems and software that control plant processes by collecting and analyzing information from measurement devices in the plant under the DeltaV and Ovation brands. The Test & Measurement offers software-connected automated test and measurement systems. The company was incorporated in 1890 and is headquartered in Saint Louis, Missouri.
A synchronized global industrial recession combined with delays in clean energy CAPEX stalls near-term automation spending. The newly acquired software segments fail to offset hardware cyclicality, causing margins to revert to the 16% historical peer average.
High switching costs associated with mission-critical process automation platforms like DeltaV.
Sticky, high-margin software and service recurring revenue base.
Scale advantages over broad-based industrials post-portfolio pivot.
Economic profit is supported when reported returns exceed the company cost-of-capital hurdle.
Unavailable
FCFF DCF remains positive at the base case: base FCFF $3.6B after capex $450.4M, with terminal value at 60.7% of enterprise value. No FCF cliff is projected unless capex/ or materially resets.
Monitor earnings quality, guidance, and valuation-sensitive operating metrics.
Monitor earnings quality, guidance, and valuation-sensitive operating metrics.
Monitor earnings quality, guidance, and valuation-sensitive operating metrics.
Transitioning from heavy hardware manufacturing CAPEX to a capital-light, software-centric model, highlighted by the low 0.28 Capex/DA ratio.
Accelerated global reshoring, grid modernization, and the clean energy transition create a secular super-cycle in process automation CAPEX.
Synchronized global industrial recession and broad delays in conventional energy projects stall automation spending.
Transitioning from heavy hardware manufacturing CAPEX to a capital-light, software-centric model, highlighted by the low 0.28 Capex/DA ratio.
Underweight.
Upside case depends on the report valuation range and named growth catalysts.
Reduce. The valuation does not offer a sufficient margin of safety given the execution risk tied to the $18B goodwill base and the assumption that peak 24% margins are structural.
Downside case: Reduce-side internal valuation cross-checks ($164.87) aggressively prices in perfect execution of the M&A synergy playbook and permanent retention of 24.2% outlier margins.
Capture your own thesis, position size, and follow-up questions. Stays on this device, only you can see it.
Industrial recession stalls spending. Newly acquired software fails to offset hardware cyclicality. The massive goodwill base drags ROIC, compressing multiples back to legacy industrial norms around $88.69.
Failure to extract synergies from recent software acquisitions causes ROIC to stagnate below WACC, driven by the $18B goodwill burden.
Macroeconomic weakness and deferred conventional energy projects significantly halt process automation spending across key markets.
Current 24.2% operating margins prove unsustainable and revert to the 16% historical industry norm amidst competitive pricing pressures.
The five developments that would weaken our investment case.
Sustained revenue contraction indicates that high-margin software acquisitions and automation solutions are failing to counterbalance cyclical industrial weakness, impairing overall top-line expansion and eroding the premium valuation multiple assigned to recurring revenue streams.
Current:3.0% for the period ended 2025-09-30
Alert if<0.0% over two consecutive quarters
Severe margin compression toward legacy industrial levels would demonstrate an inability to sustain pricing power amidst competitive pressure, invalidating the thesis that software portfolio transformation structurally elevates corporate profitability above historical norms.
Current:19.6% for the period ended 2025-09-30
Alert if<16.0% over a trailing 12-month period
Persistent capital return degradation reveals that expensive software acquisitions fail to generate required economic profit above the cost of capital, confirming that balance sheet goodwill accumulation permanently impairs shareholder value creation.
Current:6.91% as of the 2026-05-13 analysis date
Alert if<6.00% over a trailing 12-month period
Earnings contraction beneath prior annual levels signals that operating cost inflation and slowing automation demand are eroding net profitability, undermining internal valuation cross-check growth expectations and prompting multiple contraction across the industrial peer group.
Current:4.04 for the period ended 2025-09-30
Alert if<3.43 over a trailing 12-month period
A breakdown in cash conversion below net earnings highlights working capital absorption or aggressive revenue recognition, jeopardizing free cash generation necessary to fund ongoing shareholder dividends and share buybacks.
Current:1.351 as of the 2026-05-13 analysis date
Alert if<1.000 over a trailing 12-month period
Each lens answers a different valuation question. Only included lenses set Fair value; floors and diagnostics provide context.
Project SBC-adjusted EPS, discount each year's earnings at cost of equity, then add a Gordon-growth terminal value.
Project EPS through the explicit advantage period, fade growth as competition catches up, and discount the full stream at cost of equity.
Apply a terminal P/E to the dated forward EPS path, then discount that future share value back to the analysis date.
Convert the revenue and margin path into after-tax free cash flow, discount the annual per-share amounts and at , then adjust for signed per current share.
Add depreciation to net income, subtract maintenance capex, divide by diluted shares, and apply a normalized valuation multiple.
Multiply the peer median PEG by this stock's forecast growth to derive an implied forward P/E, then apply it to forward EPS.
Solve for the growth rate that makes the model value equal the report-date share price.
Emerson's high-margin software suites command durable pricing power. Accelerated reshoring and grid modernization drive organic revenue growth to high single-digits, pushing fair value to $155.92.
The company effectively executes its pure-play automation pivot. Software and service recurring revenues stabilize cyclicality, but massive M&A goodwill caps ROIC expansion, anchoring value at $122.21.
Monitor earnings quality, guidance, and valuation-sensitive operating metrics.
Warning level: <0.0% over two consecutive quarters. Sustained revenue contraction indicates that high-margin software acquisitions and automation solutions are failing to counterbalance cyclical industrial weakness, impairing overall top-line expansion and eroding the premium valuation multiple assigned to recurring revenue streams.
Warning level: <16.0% over a trailing 12-month period. Severe margin compression toward legacy industrial levels would demonstrate an inability to sustain pricing power amidst competitive pressure, invalidating the thesis that software portfolio transformation structurally elevates corporate profitability above historical norms.
Warning level: <6.00% over a trailing 12-month period. Persistent capital return degradation reveals that expensive software acquisitions fail to generate required economic profit above the cost of capital, confirming that balance sheet goodwill accumulation permanently impairs shareholder value creation.
Warning level: <3.43 over a trailing 12-month period. Earnings contraction beneath prior annual levels signals that operating cost inflation and slowing automation demand are eroding net profitability, undermining internal valuation cross-check growth expectations and prompting multiple contraction across the industrial peer group.
Warning level: <1.000 over a trailing 12-month period. A breakdown in cash conversion below net earnings highlights working capital absorption or aggressive revenue recognition, jeopardizing free cash generation necessary to fund ongoing shareholder dividends and share buybacks.
| $15.17B |
| $17.49B |
| $18.02B |
| +9.3% |
| Gross profit | $6.31B | $7.43B | $8.89B | $9.52B | +14.7% |
| Operating income | $2.66B | $3.16B | $2.34B | $3.32B | +7.7% |
| Net income | $3.23B | $13.22B | $1.97B | $2.29B | -10.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.41 | $22.88 | $3.43 | $4.04 | -9.3% |
| EBITDA | $3.50B | $4.22B | $4.03B | $4.84B | +11.4% |
| R&D | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | $3.61B | $4.19B | $5.14B | $5.10B | +12.2% |
Capital allocation should be evaluated against reinvestment needs, balance-sheet strength, and shareholder returns.
| Revenue | 18,016,000,000 |
|---|---|
| Cost of revenue | 8,497,000,000 |
| Gross profit | 9,519,000,000 |
| Operating expenses | 5,987,000,000 |
| Operating income | 3,532,000,000 |
| Non-operating items and tax | -1,239,000,000 |
| Net income | 2,293,000,000 |
| Total assets | 41,964,000,000 |
|---|---|
| Cash | 1,544,000,000 |
| Current assets | 8,583,000,000 |
| Total liabilities | 21,666,000,000 |
| Current liabilities | 9,797,000,000 |
| Shareholders’ equity | 20,282,000,000 |
Point-in-time financial data used in the 2026-05-13 analysis.
| Period | Revenue | EBITDA | Net income | Operating cash flow | Free cash flow | Capex | Depreciation and amortization | Stock-based compensation | Share repurchases | Dividends paid | Net debt issuance | Investing cash flow | Financing cash flow | Beginning cash | Ending cash | Cash and investments | Total debt | Operating margin | ROIC | WACC | ROIC − WACC spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-30 | 13.8B | 3.5B | 3.2B | 2.9B | 2.6B | 299M | 842M | 125M | 500M | 1.2B | 3.7B | — | — | — | — | 1.8B | 10.7B | 17.1% | — | — | — |
| 2023-09-30 | 15.2B | 4.2B | 13.2B | 637M | 274M | 363M | 1.1B | 250M | 2.2B | 1.2B | -3.2B | — | — | — | — | 8.1B | 8.6B | 18.2% | — | 8.4% | — |
| 2024-09-30 | 17.5B | 4B | 2B | 3.3B | 2.9B | 419M | 1.7B | 260M | 643M | 1.2B | -567M | — | — | — | — | 3.6B | 8.4B | 15.2% | — | 7.5% | — |
| 2025-09-30 | 18B | 4.8B | 2.3B | 3.1B | 2.7B | 431M | 1.5B | 263M | 1.2B | 1.2B | 5.2B | — | — | — | — | 1.5B | 13.8B | 19.6% | — | 8.3% | — |
EMR trades at 19.2x forward earnings against a peer median of 25.6x; EV/EBITDA of 15.2x against a peer median of 21.9x; 6 peers.
| Eaton Corporation plc |
| 25.6x |
| 5.5x |
| 27.9x |
| 20.8% |
| 16.1% |
| PH | Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 25.9x | 5.3x | 21.9x | 24.8% | 21.5% |
| CMI | Cummins Inc. | 21.2x | 2.9x | 20.6x | 22.0% | 9.8% |
| ITW | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 20.7x | 4.5x | 17.1x | 96.8% | 25.7% |
