With your permission, we use privacy-limited analytics to understand which research journeys work. We do not run advertising trackers or session replay. You can change this choice in Preferences. Read the Privacy Policy.
Quote this valuation with its source: Fair value, Potential value and the price at analysis.
FAQ
NOC — frequently asked questions
Is Northrop Grumman Corporation overvalued?
In our latest published analysis dated 2026-05-13, NOC looks meaningfully undervalued. The price recorded at analysis is USD 558 versus our fair value of USD 726; the high endpoint is presented separately as potential value of USD 966. That implies roughly 30.0% upside to fair value at that date.
Our latest published report, analyzed 2026-05-13, gives NOC a fair value of USD 726 and a potential value of USD 966. The conclusion is triangulated across multiple valuation models and weighted by reliability for Northrop Grumman Corporation's archetype; it is a dated research output, not a live price.
Should I buy NOC now?
Our latest published rating for NOC, analyzed 2026-05-13, is Buy. Northrop Grumman Corporation looks meaningfully undervalued at the analysis-date price of USD 558 versus fair value of USD 726; potential value is USD 966. This is research for educational purposes, not personalized investment advice.
What are the biggest risks for NOC?
The dedicated bear-case section in our report analyzed 2026-05-13 documents Northrop Grumman Corporation's material risks, evidence, thresholds, and thesis-invalidation conditions. Scenario-specific explanations remain in that section so the report does not repeat or decontextualize them elsewhere.
What is NOC's rating?
Our latest published rating for NOC, analyzed 2026-05-13, is Buy, with a published moat assessment of 9/10 (Wide). It reflects our fair value of USD 726, the potential value of USD 966, and the price recorded at analysis (USD 558).
Bull: Global threat environment drives sustained defense spending increases.
Main risk
Severe Budget Sequestration: A deeply divided Congress enforces strict defense budget caps, halting modernization of the nuclear triad and capping space spending.
Northrop Grumman is a high-quality, mature compounder operating within a highly concentrated defense oligopoly. Its entrenched position in critical, long-cycle U.S. strategic deterrent programs (space, advanced aeronautics, nuclear triad modernization) provides exceptional revenue visibility and high barriers to entry.
Northrop Grumman is a high-quality, mature compounder operating within a highly concentrated defense oligopoly. Its entrenched position in critical, long-cycle U.S. strategic deterrent programs (space, advanced aeronautics, nuclear triad modernization) provides exceptional revenue visibility and high barriers to entry.
Switching Costs (Long product life cycles, high integration)
Cycle upside
Accelerating global defense spending and space commercialization.
House recommendation
Buy. The valuation is fundamentally supported by normalized cash flow generation, respects the capex cycle, and matches internal valuation cross-checks perfectly.
Company overview
Northrop Grumman Corporation operates as an aerospace and defense technology company in the United States, Asia/Pacific, Europe, and internationally. It operates through four segments: Aeronautics Systems, Defense Systems, Mission Systems and Space Systems. The Aeronautics Systems segment designs, develops, produces, integrates, sustains, and modernizes aircraft systems. This segment also offers unmanned autonomous aircraft systems, including high-altitude long-endurance strategic, surveillance and reconnaissance systems; and strategic long-range strike aircraft, tactical fighter and air dominance aircraft, and airborne battle management and command and control systems. Its Defense Systems segment designs, develops, integrates, and produces strategic deterrent systems, tactical weapons, and missile defense solutions; and provides sustainment, modernization, and training services for manned and unmanned aircraft and electronics systems. This segment also offers strategic missiles; integrated all-domain command and control systems; precision strike weapons; tactical solid rocket motors, and high-speed air-breathing and hypersonic systems; high-performance gun systems, ammunition, precision munitions, and advanced fuzes; and sustainment, operation, and modernization. The Mission Systems segment provides command, control, communication and computer, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems; radar, electro-optical/infrared, and acoustic sensors; electronic warfare systems; advanced communications and network systems; microelectronics; navigation and positioning sensors; maritime power, propulsion, and payload launch systems; cyber solutions; and intelligence processing systems. Its Space Systems segment offers satellites, spacecraft systems, subsystems, sensors, and payloads; ground systems; missile defense systems and interceptors; and launch vehicles and related propulsion systems. The company was founded in 1939 and is based in Falls Church, Virginia.
Operating profitability sinking past this boundary would highlight severe execution friction across major programs or inability to absorb production cost inflation, eroding baseline net income and forcing multiple de-ratings across defense peer comparisons.
Current:10.2% for the period ended 2025-12-31
Alert ifFalls below 10.0% over any trailing twelve-month period
Persistent manufacturing headwinds or reach-forward losses on fixed-price aerospace development lots would erode product gross profitability, undermining production scale economics and limiting cash generation necessary to fund ongoing defense development commitments.
Current:19.8% for the period ended 2025-12-31
Alert ifCompresses below 18.0% over any fiscal year
Contraction in top-line growth driven by legislative funding friction or delays in prime contract awards would jeopardize multi-year revenue expansion, restricting overall scale advantages and reducing long-term cash flow predictability across core defense franchises.
Current:2.2% for the period ended 2025-12-31
Alert ifDrops below 0.0% YoY over two consecutive quarters
A persistent decline in conversion efficiency signals unfavorable working capital build, milestone billing delays, or elevated capital requirements that restrict discretionary capital deployment, reducing funds available for shareholder returns and debt reduction.
Current:1.137 as of the 2026-05-13 analysis date
Alert ifDips below 1.00x over any trailing twelve-month period
Diminishing capital productivity suggests that heavy ongoing investments in major defense franchises are failing to generate sufficient operating returns, eroding economic moat strength and destroying shareholder value relative to the company cost of capital.
Convert the revenue and margin path into after-tax free cash flow, discount the annual per-share amounts and at , then adjust for signed per current share.
Warning level: Falls below 10.0% over any trailing twelve-month period. Operating profitability sinking past this boundary would highlight severe execution friction across major programs or inability to absorb production cost inflation, eroding baseline net income and forcing multiple de-ratings across defense peer comparisons.
Warning level: Compresses below 18.0% over any fiscal year. Persistent manufacturing headwinds or reach-forward losses on fixed-price aerospace development lots would erode product gross profitability, undermining production scale economics and limiting cash generation necessary to fund ongoing defense development commitments.
Warning level: Drops below 0.0% YoY over two consecutive quarters. Contraction in top-line growth driven by legislative funding friction or delays in prime contract awards would jeopardize multi-year revenue expansion, restricting overall scale advantages and reducing long-term cash flow predictability across core defense franchises.
Warning level: Dips below 1.00x over any trailing twelve-month period. A persistent decline in conversion efficiency signals unfavorable working capital build, milestone billing delays, or elevated capital requirements that restrict discretionary capital deployment, reducing funds available for shareholder returns and debt reduction.
Warning level: Declines below 11.0% over any fiscal year. Diminishing capital productivity suggests that heavy ongoing investments in major defense franchises are failing to generate sufficient operating returns, eroding economic moat strength and destroying shareholder value relative to the company cost of capital.